Annual general meeting (AGM) in the digital era: Where do Italian companies stand?

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Sonia Vitali, Michele Guidi, Marco Giuliani
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 23 P. 149-171 Dimensione file 421 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Digital transformation has emerged as a crucial driver for businesses to thrive in today’s dynamic landscape. This process has accelerated due to the widespread impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, compelling companies to reshape their corpo-rate governance structures and mechanisms, including the format of annual gen-eral meetings (AGMs). In light of these developments, this study aims to explore how technological, organizational, and environmental factors influence the adop-tion and implementation of virtual AGMs among companies, using the theoretical lens of the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. To achieve this, the study adopts a qualitative approach to examine the factors underlying the digital transformation of shareholder meetings in Italy. Specifically, the research conducts an inductive content analysis of AGM minutes from Italian companies listed on the FTSE-MIB, covering the years 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022. The evidence indicates that virtual AGMs among Italian listed companies are not widespread. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Italian firms avoided conducting virtual AGMs due to technological, organizational, and environmental factors, and most have no immediate plans to implement online meetings. Consequently, the pandemic has not driven AGM innovation in the Italian context. This evidence contributes to the literature on virtual shareholder meetings and provides insights for future research into companies’ perspectives on this theme.

Keywords:Annual General Meeting, Virtual Shareholder Meeting, Digital Trans-formation, Corporate Governance, TOE Framework, Content Analysis.

  1. Abdennadher S., Cheffi W. (2020), The effectiveness of e-corporate governance: an exploratory study of internet voting at shareholders’ annual meetings in France, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(4), pp. 673-702. DOI: 10.1108/CG-04-2019-0116
  2. Akter M., Kummer T.F., Yigitbasioglu O. (2024), Looking beyond the hype: The challenges of blockchain adoption in accounting, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53.
  3. Amin M.E.K., Nørgaard L.S., Cavaco A.M., Witry M.J., Hillman L., Cernasev A., Desselle S.P. (2020), Establishing trustworthiness and authenticity in qualitative pharmacy research, Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 16(10), pp. 1472-1482.
  4. Anney V.N. (2014), Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: Looking at trustworthiness criteria, Journal of emerging trends in educational research and policy studies, 5(2), pp. 272-281.
  5. Aoun C., Vatanasakdakul S., Chen Y. (2011), IT governance framework adoption: Establishing success factors. In Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems. Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of IT: IFIP WG 8.6 International Working Conference, Hamburg, Germany, September 22-24, 2011. Proceedings (pp. 239-248), Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  6. Apostolides N. (2010), Exercising corporate governance at the annual general meeting, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(2), pp. 140-149. DOI: 10.1108/14720701011035666
  7. Baker J. (2012), The Technology – Organization – Environment Framework. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_12
  8. Baiod W., Hussain M.M. (2024), The impact and adoption of emerging technologies on accounting: perceptions of Canadian companies, International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.
  9. Bany Mohammad A., Al-Okaily M., Al-Majali M., Masa’deh R.E. (2022), Business intelligence and analytics (BIA) usage in the banking industry sector: an application of the TOE framework, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 189.
  10. Barko T., Cremers M., Renneboog L. (2022), Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), pp. 777-812.
  11. Belyeu K., Lloyd C., Ramming A., Riggs S. (2021), 2021 Global Benchmark Policy Survey, Institutional Shareholder Services.
  12. Borgman H. P., Bahli B., Heier H., Schewski F. (2013), Cloudrise: Exploring cloud computing adoption and governance with the TOE framework, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.132
  13. Boros E. (2003), Virtual shareholder meetings, Duke L. & Tech. Rev., 3, 1.
  14. Brochet F., Chychyla R., Ferri F. (2021), Virtual shareholder meetings, University of Miami Legal Studies Research Paper, 3743064.
  15. Bryan J.D., & Zuva T. (2021), A review on TAM and TOE framework progression and how these models integrate, Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 6(3), 137-145.
  16. Culasso F., Giacosa E., Giordino D., Crocco E. (2022), Digital transformation: Is COVID-19 a catalyst for micro and small enterprises first steps toward innovation?, Management Control, 2, pp. 71-94.
  17. Dehghani M., William Kennedy R., Mashatan A., Rese A., & Karavidas D. (2022), High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology, Journal of Business Research, 149.
  18. Elo S., Kyngäs H. (2008), The qualitative content analysis process, Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), pp. 107-115.
  19. Eryılmaz Ö. (2022), Are dissertations trustworthy enough? The case of Turkish ph. d. dissertations on social studies education, Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), pp. 344-361.
  20. Fairfax L.M. (2010), Virtual shareholder meetings reconsidered. Seton Hall L. Rev., 40, 1367.
  21. Fontenot L.A. (2017), Public company virtual-only annual meetings, Business Lawyer, 73, 35.
  22. Freeburn L., Ramsay I. (2021), Virtual Shareholder Meetings in Australia. International Company and Commercial Law Review, 32(2), pp. 53-79. Available at SSRN.
  23. Gao H., Huang J., Zhang T. (2020), Can online annual general meetings increase shareholders’ participation in corporate governance?, Financial Management, 49(4), pp. 1029-1050.
  24. Ghobakhloo M., Arias-Aranda D., Benitez-Amado J. (2011), Adoption of e-commerce applications in SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(8). DOI: 10.1108/02635571111170785
  25. Guba E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Ectj, 29(2), pp. 75-91.
  26. Guba E.G., Lincoln Y.S. (1982), Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry,. Ectj, 30(4), pp. 233-252.
  27. Ianniello G., Stefanoni A. (2022), Redditività aziendale e partecipazione all’assemblea annuale degli azionisti nelle società italiane quotate in borsa, RIREA, 2, pp. 176-196. DOI: 10.17408/RIREAGIAS050607082022
  28. Iwasaki M. (2020), Are in-person shareholder meetings outdated? The value of implicit communication, Asian Journal of Law and Economics, 11(3).
  29. Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  30. Kastiel K., Nili Y. (2016), In Search of the Absent Shareholders: A New Solution to Retail Investors’ Apathy. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 41, 55.
  31. Kiu C.T.T., Chan J.H. (2024), Firm characteristics and the adoption of data analytics in performance management: a critical analysis of EU enterprises, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 124(2). DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-07-2023-0430
  32. Kraus S., Durst S., Ferreira J.J., Veiga P., Kailer N., Weinmann, A. (2022), Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo, International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102466.
  33. Krieger F., Drews P., Velte P. (2021), Explaining the (non-) adoption of advanced data analytics in auditing: A process theory, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 41.
  34. Lafarre A., Van der Elst C. (2018), Blockchain technology for corporate governance and shareholder activism, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)-Law Working Paper (390).
  35. Lattemann C. (2005), The use of ICT in annual shareholder meetings and investor relations: An examination of the German stock market, Corporate Reputation Review, 8(2), 110-120.
  36. Maneesriwongul W., Dixon J.K. (2004), Instrument translation process: a methods review, Journal of advanced nursing, 48(2), pp. 175-186.
  37. Matarazzo M., Penco L., Profumo G., Quaglia R. (2021), Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective, Journal of Business Research, 123, pp. 642-656.
  38. Moro Visconti R. (2020), Corporate governance, digital platforms, and network theory: information and risk-return sharing of connected stakeholders, Management Control, 2, pp. 179-204, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-002009
  39. Morrow Sodali (2020), The 2020 European AGM season. Taking stock of the shareholder sentiment and looking forward to 2021. Morrow Sodali.
  40. Nili Y., Shaner M. W. (2022), Virtual Annual Meetings: A Path Toward Shareholder Democracy and Stakeholder Engagement. Boston College Law Review, 63, 123.
  41. Obialor C., Ayileka A. (2020), COVID-19: Virtual AGM and the Need for Business Continuity, SSRN Electronic Journa.
  42. Oliveira T., Martins M. F., & Lisboa U. N. de (2011), Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level, Review of Economics Studies, 14(1).
  43. Olutoyin O., & Flowerday S. (2016), Successful IT governance in SMES: an application of the Technology-Organisation-Environment theory, South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1), pp. 1-8.
  44. Paoloni P., Manzo M., Procacci V. (2023), The impact of the pandemic crisis on the digital transition process of Italian SMEs, Suppl. 2, Management Control. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2023-002-S1005
  45. Patton M. Q. (2002), Qualitative research & evaluation methods, Sage.
  46. Puklavec B., Oliveira T., Popovič A. (2018), Understanding the determinants of business intelligence system adoption stages an empirical study of SMEs, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 118(1). DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-05-2017-0170
  47. Rose J., Johnson C.W. (2020), Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: Toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research, Journal of leisure research, 51(4), pp. 432-451.
  48. Rosli K., HP Yeow P., & Eu-Gene S. (2013), Adoption of audit technology in audit firms.
  49. Schwandt T. A., Lincoln Y. S., & Guba E. G. (2007), Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation, New directions for evaluation, (114), pp. 11-25.
  50. Schwartz-Ziv M. (2021), How shifting from in-person to virtual-only shareholder meetings affects shareholders’ voice, European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper (748).
  51. Seshadrinathan S., Chandra S. (2021), Exploring factors influencing adoption of blockchain in accounting applications using technology-organization-environment framework, Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 30(1), pp. 30-68.
  52. Siew E.G., Rosli K., Yeow P.H.P. (2020), Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36.
  53. So I. G., Haron H., Gui A., Princes E., & Sari S. A. (2021), Sustainability reporting disclosure in Islamic corporates: do human governance, corporate governance, and IT usage matter?, Sustainability, 13(23), 13023.
  54. Stjepić A. M., Pejić Bach M., & Bosilj Vukšić V. (2021), Exploring risks in the adoption of business intelligence in SMEs using the TOE framework, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 58.
  55. Strätling R. (2003), General meetings: a dispensable tool for corporate governance of listed companies?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(1), pp. 74-82. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00303
  56. Subramaniam R., Singh S.P., Padmanabhan P., Gulyás B., Palakkeel P., Sreedharan R. (2021), Positive and Negative Impacts of COVID-19 in Digital Transformation, Sustainability, 13(16), 9470.
  57. Tornatzky L.G., Fleischer M., Chakrabarti .K. (1990), The processes of technological innovation. (No Title).
  58. Ullah F., Qayyum S., Thaheem M. J., Al-Turjman F., Sepasgozar S.M.E. (2021), Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167.
  59. Van der Krans A. (2007), The virtual shareholders meeting: How to make it work, Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology, 2, 32.
  60. Wang Q, Wang K. (2021), Does high-speed rail stimulate shareholder activism by small investors in China?, China Journal of Accounting Studies, 9(3), pp. 408-431. DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2021.2009178
  61. Widuri R., Handoko B. L., Prabowo I. C. (2019, May), Adoption of information technology in public accounting firm, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Computing (pp. 198-202).
  62. Yao S., Pan Y., Wang L., Sensoy A., Cheng F. (2022), Building Eco-friendly Corporations: The Role of Minority Shareholders, Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 1-34.
  63. Zhang F., Yang J., Xu Z., & Zhu G. (2018), Large shareholder participation behaviors, managers’ risk-taking and firm innovation performance: A shareholder activism perspective, Nankai Business Review International, 9(1), pp. 99-115.

Sonia Vitali, Michele Guidi, Marco Giuliani, Annual general meeting (AGM) in the digital era: Where do Italian companies stand? in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2 Suppl./2024, pp 149-171, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1008