DE IUSTITIA ET IURE

The Journal “De Iustitia et Iure. Legal Journal of Foundations and Discussions”, which can be placed in area 12 of the legal sciences, is named after the first Title of Book 1 of Justinian’s Digest. The title makes it clear that the context of inspiration is the Roman legal system. Also faithful to this context is the subtitle of the journal, “Legal Journal of Foundations and Discussions”, where the English language helps to show its international dimension. The reference to law, its foundations and (scientific) discussions highlight the adherence to traditional schemes in constant innovation, according to the principles that animate the Civil (Roman) Law system: leges, iura and ius controversum.
In fact, the aims of the Review are inspired by the aforementioned principles, aiming to involve jurists, practitioners in various capacities in the vast world of law as well as scholars from various disciplines, in comparisons on topics of legal relevance. The aim is to invite various professionals to discussions that will be ‘provoked’ from time to time on specific topics, in order to offer readers a multiplicity of viewpoints. The topics will be inspired by the constituent elements of our legal system; in fact, it will be a matter of identifying rules or judicial pronouncements (not only Italian) on which the authors will be called upon to discuss.
The Journal will be organised annually in two ‘fascicles’ with a six-monthly cadence. Each issue will be composed of contributions of limited length, in order to give the discussion a fast pace, similar to a debate organised around a ‘round table’. In each issue, the contributions will be collected within thematic sections devoted to specific topics, identified by the scientific direction with the help of the scientific committee, according to the above-mentioned intentions and modalities.
Each contribution will be submitted for evaluation by two experts, especially from universities and research institutions, according to the scheme of mutual lack of knowledge between evaluators and evaluated. Contributions may be written in one of the Latin languages (among Italian, Spanish, French, Portuguese) or in English and must be provided with an abstract in English and also in the language used in the article as well as the indication of at least six key words.
The journal, with these characteristics, aims to be part of the debates that give life to legal science, offering a variety of food for thought and points of view, useful – it is hoped – at least in the search for solutions to the problems of our daily lives.

Scientific Directors
Franco Vallocchia, Pietro Mazzei

Scientific Board (in alfabetical order)
Antonio Attianese (Roma); Antonio Angelosanto (Roma); Massimo Bianca (Trieste); Federico Carrai (Roma); Angelo Castaldo (Roma); Giuseppe Chiné (Palermo); Emanuele Cimiotta (Perugia); Giovanni D’Alessandro (Roma); Marko Di Vincenzo (Roma); Sebastiano Faro (Firenze); Doris Forster (Ginevra); Felice Giuffré (Catania); Carmen Lázaro Guillamón (Valencia); Umberto La Commara (Roma); Andrea Lippi (Milano); Massimo Luciani (Roma); Giovanni Neri (Roma); Andrea Orestano (Perugia); Laurent Reverso (Tolone)

Editorial Board
Chiara Iovacchini, Francesco Maria Lucci, Martina Fabrizi, Riccardo Feliziani, Marta Fattorini, Francesca Bonanni

Editorial secretariat
De Iustitia et Iure (c/o Humanitas)
Via della Conciliazione, 22
00193 Roma (Italy)

E-mail
dipartimentogiuridico@consorziohumanitas.com

The writings submitted for publication are subject to a revision procedure which complies with the standards in use for scientific publications at international level. The Director makes a preliminary assessment of the manuscript’s potential for publication. The work passed through for assessment is sent anonymously to two scientific reviewers with recognized expertise in the topic, and they will express their overall assessment and an analytical opinion, both of which will be communicated to the author confidentially, to be revealed only to the Director and to the Editorial Board of the Journal. The author will also receive suggestions as to the piece’s suitability for publication in line with one of the following four designations: a) acceptable for publication in its current version. b) acceptable with minor revisions. c) potentially acceptable after substantial revision. d) not acceptable for publication in the journal. The decision regarding the manuscript’s suitability for publication is sent to the author along with the comments of the reviewers

- Catalogo italiano dei periodici/Acnp

- EBSCO Knowledge Base

- Google Scholar

- Sherpa-Romeo

- Torrossa - Casalini Full Text Platform

Editorial Guidelines
Licence agreement

Article Processing Charges & Fees

Articles concerning individuals or containing personal information that makes a human subject identifiable must comply with the international standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki, developed by the World Medical Association (WMA) and revised in 2013.

For further information about the ethical conduct of the journal, please refer to the Publication Ethics linked in this section:
Ethics

Francoangeli is aware of the importance of ensuring the preservation of digital content in order to increase the visibility and impact of its publications. For this purpose, we are members of Clockss and Portico. They are international associations of publishers and libraries, created to ensure the preservation of electronic academic publications and future access whenever the conditions for accessing the content through other forms fail.
They are certified repositories offering also authors and libraries the guarantee of technological updating, and formats to allow them to enjoy full text in perpetuity and in the most complete way possible.

For more information: Home - CLOCKSS ; Publishers – Portico.