Ambidextrous Intellectual Capital in the scientific research: An empirical analysis on university spin-offs

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Fabio Nappo, Federico Schimperna, Maria Schimperna
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 199-222 Dimensione file 410 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This work aims at analyzing the level of awareness on the topic of planning and control by people with an apical role in research spin-offs, suggesting a framework to increase the survivability of spin-offs. The universities take a strategic role as “knowledge incubators” to ensure competi-tive advantage through the use of their knowledge stock. In this scenario, research spin-offs contribute to the valorisation of intellectual capital in universities. How-ever, Consorzio Netval’s data highlighted that the percentage of spin-offs liquidat-ed from 2000 to 2019 is approximately 72%. The analysis of the literature shows many issues that spin-offs face; however, there is little research on another possible critical issue that this study aims to fill: the difficulties during the phases of research spin-offs’ planning and control, espe-cially in adequately balancing their short and long-term goals. Thus, we submitted a questionnaire to a panel of experts to investigate their view of the management, planning and control systems. Results show a lack of atten-tion to the application of these systems in spin-offs, while acknowledging aware-ness of their importance. On the basis of these findings, we propose a framework to increase the survivabil-ity of research spin-offs, overcoming their main issues. Our framework relies on the application of ambidextrous intellectual capital to spin-offs, considered a valuable solution, given that it combines the attention to the future, typical of spin-offs and start-ups, with the attention to the present, necessary to go beyond the pre-seed phase.

Keywords:spin-off, intellectual capital, ambidexterity, innovation, planning and control; university

  1. Zhang S. K., Tang T. Y., & Wu F. (2021), The ambidextrous patterns for managing technological and marketing innovation, Industrial Marketing Management, 92, pp. 34-44.
  2. Ahamad S., Al-Jaifi H. A. A., & Ehigiamusoe K. U. (2022), Impact of intellectual capital on microfinance institutions’ efficiency: The moderating role of external governance, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, pp. 1-27.
  3. Alänge S., Steiber A. (2018), Three operational models for ambidexterity in large corporations, Triple Helix, 5(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1186/S40604-018-0053-9
  4. Armenia S., Barile S., Iandolo F., Pompei A., & Sicca L. M. (2024), Organisational ambidexterity and knowledge management: A systems perspective towards Smart Model‐based Governance, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 41(3), pp. 439-452.
  5. Asiaei K., Jusoh R., Bontis N. (2018), Intellectual capital and performance measurement systems in Iran, Journal of Intellectual Capital. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0125
  6. Baldini N. (2010), Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy, Technovation, 30(2), pp. 109-116.
  7. Baškarada S., Watson J., Cromarty J. (2016), Leadership and organizational ambidexterity, Journal of Management Development, 35(6), pp. 778-788. DOI: 10.1108/JMD-01-2016-0004
  8. Bathelt H., Kogler D. F., Munro A. K. (2010), A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development. Technovation, 30(9-10), pp. 519-532.
  9. Becker G. S. (1964), Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Bell E., Bryman A., & Harley B. (2022), Business research methods, Oxford university press.
  11. Benner M. J., Tushman M. L. (2003), Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of management review, 28(2), pp. 238-256.
  12. Birkinshaw J., & Gupta K. (2013), Clarifying the distinctive contribution of ambidexterity to the field of organization studies, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp. 287-298.
  13. Bontis N. (1998), Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models, Management decision, 36(2), pp. 63-76. DOI: 10.1108/00251749810204142
  14. Breznitz S. M., O’Shea R. P., Allen T. J. (2008), University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters, Journal of product innovation management, 25(2), pp. 129-142.
  15. Chen Y. (2017), Dynamic ambidexterity: How innovators manage exploration and exploitation, Business Horizons, 60(3), pp. 385-394
  16. Conti G., Granieri M., Piccaluga A. (2011), La gestione del trsferimento tecnologico. Strategie, Modelli e Strumenti, Springer, Milano. DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1902-7
  17. Davila A., Foster G., & Jia N. (2015), The valuation of management control systems in start-up companies: International field-based evidence, European Accounting Review, 24(2), pp. 207-239.
  18. Dezi L., Ferraris A., Papa A., & Vrontis D. (2019), The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(2), pp. 360-369. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2916378
  19. Di Berardino D. (2013), Intangible assets and project management in academic spin offs, In Electronic International Interdisciplinary Conference (pp. 26-38). EDIS PUBLISHING INSTITUTION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ZILINA.
  20. Dortega P. F, Costa R. V., Fernandez C. F. J. (2013), Product innovation and relational capital: Evidence from Portugal, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), pp. 295-308.
  21. Duncan R. B. (1976), The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation, The management of organization, 1(1), pp. 167-188.
  22. Elia G., Lerro A., Passiante G., & Schiuma G. (2017), An Intellectual Capital perspective for Business Model Innovation in technology-intensive industries: empirical evidences from Italian spin-offs, Knowledge management research & practice, 15, pp. 155-168.
  23. Etzkowitz H. (2003), Research groups as quasi-firms: the invention of the entrepreneurial university, Research Policy, 32(1), pp. 109-121. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
  24. Feldman J.M., & Klofsten M. (2000), Medium-sized firms and the limits to growth: A case study in the evolution of a spin-off firm, European Planning Studies, 8(5), pp. 631-650.
  25. Giakoumelou A., Salvi A., Kvasova O., & Rizomyliotis I. (2023), The start-up’s roadmap to private equity financing: substituting discounts with a premium in valuation for growth, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
  26. Gell-Mann M. (1994), The Quark and the Jaguar Adventures in the Simple and the Complex, New York, W. H. Freeman.
  27. Güttel W.H. and Konlechner S.W. (2009), Continuously hanging by a thread: managing contextually ambidextrous organizations’, Schmalenbach Business Review, 61, pp. 149-171.
  28. Guerrero M., Urbano D. (2012), The development of an entrepreneurial university, Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(1), pp. 43-74. Doi 10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x.
  29. Habersam M., & Piber M. (2003), Exploring intellectual capital in hospitals: two qualitative case studies in Italy and Austria, European Accounting Review, 12(4), pp. 753-779.
  30. Hall B. H., Rosenberg N. (Eds.) (2010), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1). Elsevier.
  31. Harris L. (2000), A theory of intellectual capital, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2(1), pp. 22-37. DOI: 10.1177/152342230000200104
  32. Hair Jr J.F., Celsi W., Money A.H., Samouel P., Page M.J. (2003), Essentials of Business Research Methods, Wiley.
  33. Hayaeian S., Hesarzadeh R., & Abbaszadeh M. R. (2021), The impact of knowledge management strategies on the relationship between intellectual capital and innovation: Evidence from SMEs, Journal of Intellectual Capital. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-07-2020-0240
  34. Helm R., and Mauroner O. (2007), Success of research-based spin-offs. State-of-the-art and guidelines for further research, Review of Managerial Science, 1, pp. 237-270.
  35. Herremans I. M., & Isaac R. G. (2005), Management planning and control: Supporting knowledge‐intensive organizations, The learning organization, 12(4), pp. 313-329.
  36. Hormiga E., Batista-Canino R.M., and Sanchez-Medina A. (2011), The role of intellectual capital in the success of new ventures, International entrepreneurship and management journal, 7(1), pp.71-92.
  37. Huang S., Battisti M., & Pickernell D. (2021), CEO regulatory focus as the microfoundation of organizational ambidexterity: A configurational approach, Journal of Business Research, 125, pp. 26-38.
  38. Iacobucci D., Iacopini A., Micozzi A., Orsini S. (2010), Fostering Entrepreneurship in Academic Spin-offs, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. DOI: 10.1504/IJESB.2011.039689
  39. Jansen J. J., Simsek Z., Cao Q. (2012), Ambidexterity and performance in multiunit contexts: Cross‐level moderating effects of structural and resource attributes, Strategic management journal, 33(11), pp. 1286-1303.
  40. Jia N. (2018), Corporate innovation strategy and stock price crash risk, Journal of Corporate Finance, 53, pp. 155-173.
  41. Joensuu-Salo S., and Viljamaa A. (2024), The relationship between digital orientation, organizational ambidexterity, and growth strategies of rural SMEs in time of crisis, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 25(2), pp. 128-141.
  42. Junni P., Sarala R. M., Taras V. A. S., Tarba S. Y. (2013), Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis, Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp. 299-312.
  43. Jurksiene L., Pundziene A. (2016). The relationship between dynamic capabilities and firm competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity, European Business Review, 28(4), pp. 431-448. DOI: 10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0088
  44. Kang S.C., Morris S.S. and Snell S.A. (2007), Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: extending the human resource architecture, Academy of Management Review, 32, pp. 236-56.
  45. Kang S. C., & Snell S. A. (2009), Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: a framework for human resource management, Journal of management studies, 46(1), pp. 65-92.
  46. Kamukama N. (2013), Intellectual capital: company’s invisible source of competitive advantage, Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 23(3), pp. 260-283.
  47. Karasneh A. A. F. (2022), Revitalizing the BSC through knowledge management: The mediating role of intellectual capital, Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), 2359.
  48. Lazzeri F., Piccaluga A. (2012), Le imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica: convinzioni, realtà e prospettive future, Economia e società regionale, (1). DOI: 10.3280/ES2012-001003
  49. Kauffman S.A. (1993), Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Kearns G. S. (2007), How the internal environment impacts information systems project success: An investigation of exploitative and explorative firms, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48(1), pp. 63-75.
  51. Lam A. (2011), What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization:‘Gold’,‘ribbon’or ‘puzzle’?, Research policy, 40(10), pp. 1354-1368.
  52. Leitner K, H., Curaj A., Elena-Perez, Fazlagic J., Kalemis K., Martinaitis Z., Secundo G., Sicilia M., (2014), A strategic approach for intellectual capital management in European universities. Guidelines for implementation, Bucharest: UEFISCDI Blueprint Series No. 1. Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.
  53. Leitner K. H., Warden C. (2004), Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organizations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 15(1), pp. 33-51.
  54. Lev B., Schwartz A. (1971), On the use of the economic concept of human capital in financial statements, The accounting review, 46(1), pp. 103-112.
  55. Levinthal D.A. and March J.G. (1993), The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp. 95-112.
  56. Liang L., Chen S., Wu D., & Wu X. (2024), How established firms build digital capabilities for business model innovation: An exploratory case study, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 72, 101819.
  57. Likert R. (1932), A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
  58. Lin C., and Chang C. C. (2015), A patent-based study of the relationships among technological portfolio, ambidextrous innovation, and firm performance, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(10), pp. 1193-1211.
  59. Lin C. J., and Chen C. C. (2015), The responsive-integrative framework, outside-in and inside-out mechanisms and ambidextrous innovations, International Journal of Technology Management, 67(2-4), pp. 148-173.
  60. Lombardi R., Schimperna F. (2021), An introduction to network analysis in intellectual capital research, Research Handbook on Intellectual Capital and Business, pp. 274-289.
  61. Lombardi R., Cano-Rubio M., Schimperna F., & Trequattrini R. (2021a), The impact of smart technologies on the management and strategic control: a structured literature review, Management Control, suppl. 1, pp. 11-30. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2021-001-S1002
  62. Lombardi R., Schimperna F., & Marcello R. (2021b), Human capital and smart tourism’s development: primary evidence, International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism, 3(3-4), pp. 294-309. DOI: 10.1504/IJDCET.2021.116492
  63. Mahmood T., Mubarik M. S. (2020), Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacity, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160,
  64. Mahmood T., Mubarik M. S., Islam T., Naghavi N. (2021), Ambidextrous intellectual capital (AIC): a measuring framework, In The Dynamics of Intellectual Capital in Current Era (pp. 1-30). Singapore: Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-1692-1_1
  65. Marasca S., Marchi L., Riccaboni A. (2013), Controllo di gestione: metodologie e strumenti.
  66. Amministrazione, finanza e controllo, Knowita.
  67. March J.G. (1991), Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2, pp. 71-87.
  68. Mariani G., Carlesi A., & Scarfò A. A. (2018), Academic spinoffs as a value driver for intellectual capital: The case of the University of Pisa. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(1), pp. 202-226.
  69. Mok K.H. (2015), The quest for global competitiveness: promotion of innovation and entrepreneurial universities in Singapore, Higher Education Policy, 28(1), pp. 91-106.
  70. Mubarik M. S., Naghavi N., Mahmood R. T. (2019), Intellectual capital, competitive advantage and the ambidexterity liaison, Human Systems Management, 38(3), pp. 267-277. DOI: 10.3233/HSM-180409
  71. Muchmore S., Ragsdell G., Colechin M., & Story V. (2018), Knowledge exploitation and value creation: Lessons from the energy sector, ICICKM 2018, 207.
  72. Nappo F., Lardo A., Bianchi M. T., & Schimperna F. (2023), The impact of digitalisation on professional football clubs, Management Control, (2), pp. 117-136. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2023-002006
  73. Nonaka I. (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation, Organization Science, 5(4), pp. 14-37.
  74. Oakey R. P., Hare P. G., Balazs K. (1996), Strategies for the exploitation of intelligence capital: evidence from Hungarian research institutes, R&D Management, 26(1), pp. 67-82.
  75. O’Reilly C. A., & Tushman M. L. (2004), The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), pp. 74-83.
  76. O’Reilly C. A., III., & Tushman M. L. (2013), Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), pp. 324-338.
  77. Park O., Bae J., & Hong W. (2019), High-commitment HRM system, HR capability, and ambidextrous technological innovation, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(9), pp. 1526-1548. DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1296880
  78. Pasamar S., Lopez-Cabrales A., Valle-Cabrales R. (2015), Ambidexterity and intellectual capital architectures for developing dynamic capabilities: Towards a research agenda, European Journal of International Management, 9(1), pp. 74-87.
  79. Pennings J. M., Lee K., & Witteloostuijn A. V. (1998). Human capital, social capital, and firm dissolution, Academy of management Journal, 41(4), pp. 425-440.
  80. Petty R., Guthrie J. (2000), Intellectual capital literature review: measurement, reporting and management, Journal of intellectual capital, 1(2), pp. 155-176. DOI: 10.1108/14691930010348731
  81. Pradana M., Pérez-Luño A., & Fuentes-Blasco M. (2020), Innovation as the key to gain performance from absorptive capacity and human capital, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), pp. 822-834. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2020.1714578
  82. Prahalad C. K., Ramaswamy V. (2000), Co-opting customer competence, Harvard business review, 78(1), pp. 79-90. DOI: 10.1108/14691930110385900
  83. Presenza A., and Petruzzelli A. M. (2019), Investigating business model innovation in Haute Cuisine. Role and behavior of chef-entrepreneurs, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 82, pp. 101-111.
  84. Raisch S., Birkinshaw J. (2008), Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators, Journal of management, 34(3), pp. 375-409. DOI: 10.1177/0149206308316058
  85. Raisch S. and Tushman M.L. (2016), Growing new corporate businesses. From initiation to graduation, Organization Science, 27(5), pp. 1237-1257.
  86. Ramírez Córcoles Y., Santos Peñalver J. F., & Tejada Ponce Á. (2011), Intellectual capital in Spanish public universities: stakeholders’ information needs, Journal of Intellectual capital, 12(3), pp. 356-376.
  87. Rasmussen E., Mosey S., Wright M. (2011), The evolution of entrepreneurial competencies: A longitudinal study of university spin‐off venture emergence, Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), pp. 1314-1345.
  88. Rehman S. U., Elrehail H., Alsaad A., & Bhatti A. (2021), Intellectual capital and innovative performance: A mediation-moderation perspective, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(3), pp .998-1024. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-04-2020-0109
  89. Rothaermel F. T., Agung S. D., & Jiang L. (2007), University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature, Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), pp. 691-791.
  90. Russo S., Schimperna F., Lombardi R., & Ruggiero P. (2022), Sustainability performance and social media: An explorative analysis, Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), pp. 1118-1140. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2021-1227
  91. Sánchez M. P, Elena S., Castrillo R. (2009), Intellectual capital dynamics in universities: a reporting model, Journal of intellectual capital, 10(2), pp. 307-324. DOI: 10.1108/14691930910952687
  92. Sanchez M. P., Elena S. (2006), Intellectual capital in universities: Improving transparency and internal management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(4), pp. 529-548. DOI: 10.1108/14691930610709158
  93. Schimperna F., Nappo F., & Marsigalia B. (2021a), Student entrepreneurship in universities: The state-of-the-art, Administrative Sciences, 12(1), p. 5.
  94. Schimperna F., Lombardi R., & Belyaeva Z. (2021b), Technological transformation, culinary tourism and stakeholder engagement: Emerging trends from a systematic literature review, Journal of Place Management and Development, 14(1), pp. 66-80. DOI: 10.1108/JPMD-03-2020-0028
  95. Secundo G., Dumay J., Schiuma G., & Passiante G, (2016), Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: An integrated framework for universities, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), pp. 298-319. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-05-2015-0046
  96. Secundo G., Margherita A., Elia G., & Passiante G. (2010), Intangible assets in higher education and research: mission, performance or both?, Journal of intellectual capital, 11(2), pp. 140-157.
  97. Shah S.K., Pahnke E.C. (2014), Parting the ivory curtain: understanding how universities support a diverse set of start-ups, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(5), pp. 780-792.
  98. Simsek Z. (2009), Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding, Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), pp. 597-624.
  99. Stewart T.A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organisations, Doubleday-Currency, London.
  100. Stewart T., & Ruckdeschel C. (1998), Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations, Performance Improvement, 37(7), pp. 56-59.
  101. Stoneman P. (1995), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell.
  102. Subramaniam M., and Youndt M.A. (2005), The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities, The Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), pp. 450-63.
  103. Swart J., and Kinnie N. (2010), Organisational learning, knowledge assets and HR practices in professional service firms, Human Resource Management Journal, 20(1), pp. 64-79.
  104. Todericiu R., Şerban A. (2015), Intellectual Capital and its relationship with universities, Procedia Economics and Finance, 27, pp. 713-717. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01052-7
  105. Trequattrini R. (2008), Conoscenza ed economia aziendale. Elementi di teoria, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane SpA, Napoli.
  106. Trequattrini R., Nappo F., Lardo A., & Cuozzo B. (2018 a), Intellectual capital and gender capital: The case of Italian universities, In Gender Issues in Business and Economics: Selections from the 2017 Ipazia Workshop on Gender (pp. 159-173). Springer International Publishing.
  107. Trequattrini R., Lombardi R., Lardo A., Cuozzo B. (2018 b), The impact of entrepreneurial universities on regional growth: a local intellectual capital perspective, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9, pp. 199-211.
  108. Trequattrini R., Russo G., Nappo F. (2008), Le fonti di finanziamento delle università tra vincoli normativi e nuove opportunità. IMPRESA AMBIENTE MANAGEMENT, (3), pp. 255-287.
  109. Turner N., Maylor H., and Swart J. (2015), Ambidexterity in projects: An intellectual capital perspective, International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), pp. 177-188.
  110. Tushman M. L., O’Reilly III C. A. (1996), Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, California management review, 38(4), pp. 8-29. DOI: 10.2307/41165852
  111. Tushman M., O’Reilly III C., Harreld B. (2015), Leading proactive punctuated change, In Leading sustainable change: An organizational perspective, pp.250-270.
  112. Veltri S., Mastroleo G., Schaffhauser-Linzatti M. (2014), Measuring intellectual capital in the university sector using a fuzzy logic expert system, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12, pp. 175-192.
  113. Wennberg K., Wiklund J., & Wright M. (2011), The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spin-offs and corporate spin-offs, Research Policy, 40, pp. 1128-1143.
  114. Weqar F., Khan A. M., Raushan M., & Haque S. M. (2021), Measuring the impact of intellectual capital on the financial performance of the finance sector of India, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(3), pp. 1134-1151.
  115. Yaseen S. G., Dajani D., and Hasan Y. (2016), The impact of intellectual capital on the competitive advantage: Applied study in Jordanian telecommunication companies, Computers in human behavior, 62, pp. 168-175.

Fabio Nappo, Federico Schimperna, Maria Schimperna, Ambidextrous Intellectual Capital in the scientific research: An empirical analysis on university spin-offs in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2 Suppl./2024, pp 199-222, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1010