Il ruolo delle matrici di "Materialità" e di "Performance" per il controllo della sostenibilità

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Cristiana Buscarini, Fabio Cerroni, Livia Scarnecchia
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 20 P. 87-106 Dimensione file 411 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2021-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Purpose: This study aims at highlighting the role of two useful tools for organiza-tions when it comes to sustainability-oriented governance: the materiality matrix proposed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), and the sustainability perfor-mance matrix that the authors developed. Methodology: We have verified the matrices' benefits by applying it to the Italian Swimming Federation (FIN). For the construction of the matrices, the authors col-lected data using an online questionnaire. The research team presented the ques-tionnaire to all subjects who communicated with the FIN in 2019. Results: The matrices used for our study have proved to be very useful tools to support organizations in the implementation of sustainability-led strategic process-es and control systems. Moreover, the above-mentioned matrices proved particu-larly useful for cultural control, planning and cybernetic control. In the specific case of the materiality matrix, we have observed that sustainability aspects scored very highly and that those aspects drove the FIN’s strategic direction. Moreover, the sustainability performance matrix’s results confirmed the chosen path's validity since all internal and external stakeholders had evaluated the al-ready implemented actions very positively to achieve greater sustainability. Implications: The method described in this study enables companies to be guided in choosing aspects of sustainability and in controlling corporate performance concerning sustainable development.

Parole chiave:Sustainability disclosure, Corporate strategy, Corporate governance, Strategic control, Stakeholder engagement, Materiality matrix, Sustainability per-formance matrix.

  1. AccountAbility (2018), AA1000 AccountAbility Principles Standard.
  2. Ahrens T., Chapman C. S. (2005), Management control systems and the crafting of strategy: a practice-based view, Controlling strategy, 106.
  3. Albertini E. (2018), ‘The Contribution of Management Control Systems to Environmental Capabilities’, Journal of Business Ethics.
  4. Anthony R. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Boston, Harvard Business Press.
  5. Arjaliès D.L., Mundy J. (2013), The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective, Management Accounting Research, 24(4), pp. 284-300.
  6. Ball A., Milne M. J. (2005), Sustainability and management control. In A. J. Berry, J. Broadbent, D. T. Otley (Eds.), Management control. Theories, issues, and performance (2nd ed., pp. 314e337). Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Bansal P. (2005), Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development, Strategic management journal, 26(3), pp. 197-218.
  8. Baumgartner R.J., Ebner D. (2010), Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels, Sustainable Development, 18(2), pp. 76-89.
  9. Battaglia M., Passetti E., Bianchi L., Frey M. (2016), Managing for integration: a longitudinal analysis of management control for sustainability, Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 213-225.
  10. Bellantuono N., Pontrandolfo P., Scozzi, B. (2016), Capturing the stakeholders’ view in sustainability reporting: a novel approach, Sustainability, 8(4), 379.
  11. Berry A.J., Coad A.F., Harris E. P., Otley D.T., Stringer C. (2009), Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature, The British Accounting Review, 41(1), pp. 2-20.
  12. Beske F., Haustein E., Lorson P.C. (2019), Materiality analysis in sustainability and integrated reports, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal.
  13. Bocken N.M.P., Short S., Rana P., Evans S. (2013), A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling, Corporate Governance, 13, 5, pp.482-497.
  14. Buscarini C., Masia R. (2016), Strategia di sostenibilità e nuovi strumenti per il management, Roma, Società Editrice Dante Alighieri.
  15. Buscarini C., Mura R. (2013), Italian Sport Federations. Communicating CSR through the Social Report, in Paramio-Salcines J.L, Babiak K., Walters G., a cura di, The Handbook of Sport and Corporate Social Responsibility, Londra, Routledge.
  16. Buscarini C. (2006), Il ruolo della rendicontazione sociale nelle Federazioni Sportive Nazionali. Proposta di Linee Guida per la redazione del Bilancio Sociale, in Buscarini C., Manni F., Marano M., a cura di, La responsabilità sociale e il bilancio sociale delle organizzazioni dello sport, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  17. Calabrese A., Costa R., Rosati F. (2015), A feedback-based model for CSR assessment and materiality analysis. Accounting Forum, 39(4), pp. 312-327.
  18. Calabrese A., Costa R., Levialdi N., Menichini T. (2016), A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production, 121, pp. 248-264.
  19. Calabrese A., Costa R., Levialdi Ghiron N., Menichini T. (2019), Materiality analysis in sustainability reporting: a tool for directing corporate sustainability towards emerging economic, environmental and social opportunities.
  20. Cao J., Zeng H. (2019), The Link between Management Control Systems and Sustainability Reporting, 24(1).
  21. Coller G., Collini P., Frigotto M.L. (2012), Strategia e design del sistema di controllo, Management Control, 2, pp. 15-41. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2012-002002
  22. Crutzen N., Zvezdov D., Schaltegger S. (2016), Sustainability and management control. Exploring and theorizing control patterns in large European firms, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd.
  23. Ditillo A., Lisi I.E. (2014), Towards a more comprehensive framework for sustainability control systems research, Accounting for the environment: More talk and little progress, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  24. Ditillo A., Lisi I.E. (2016), Exploring sustainability control systems' integration: The relevance of sustainability orientation, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), pp. 125-148.
  25. Engert S., Rauter R., Baumgartner R.J. (2016), Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: a literature review, Journal of cleaner production, 112, pp. 2833-2850.
  26. Ferreira A., Otley D. (2009), The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis, Management accounting research, 20(4), pp. 263-282.
  27. Font X., Guix M., Bonilla-Priego M.J. (2016), Corporate social responsibility in cruising: Using materiality analysis to create shared value, Tourism Management, 53, pp. 175-186.
  28. Global Reporting Initiative (2013), GRI G4, Amsterdam, Implementation Manual.
  29. Global Reporting Initiative (2016), GRI Standards, Amsterdam.
  30. Gond J.P., Grubnic S., Herzig C., Moon J. (2012), Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, Management Accounting Research, Elsevier Ltd, 23(3), pp. 205-223.
  31. Greco G., D’Onza G., Dal controllo alla creazione del valore (2020), Management Control, 2, pp. 5-9. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-002001
  32. Greenwood M. (2007), Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), pp. 315-327
  33. Hart S.L., Milstein M.B. (2003), Creating sustainable value, Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), pp. 56-67.
  34. Ingham M., Havard C. (2017), CSR as strategic and organizational change at “Groupe la poste”, Journal of Business Ethics, 146(3), pp. 563-589.
  35. Kaplan R.S., D. P. Norton (1992), The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review 70(1), pp. 7 179.
  36. Lo S.F. (2010), Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework, Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 17(6), pp. 311-319.
  37. Kujala J., Korhonen A. (2017), Value-creating stakeholder relationships in the context of CSR. In Stakeholder engagement, Clinical research cases (pp. 63-85). Springer, Cham.
  38. Lövstål E., Jontoft A. (2017), Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature review, Journal of Management Control, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 28(1), pp. 41-79.
  39. Lueg R, Radlach R. (2016), Managing sustainable development with management control systems: A literature review, European Management Journal, 34, pp.158-71.
  40. Malmi T., Brown D.A. (2008), Management control systems as a package – Opportunities, challenges and research directions, Management accounting research, 19(4), pp. 287-300.
  41. Maraghini M.P. (2018), Management Control: il “gattopardo” per il governo aziendale. Management Control.
  42. Marchi L. (2020), Dalla crisi allo sviluppo sostenibile. Il ruolo dei sistemi di misurazione e controllo, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-003001
  43. Marchi L. (2019), Governo delle aziende e creazione di valore: da una prospettiva finanziaria ad una prospettiva economico-sociale, Management Control, 1, pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-001001
  44. Merchant K.A., Otley D.T., (2007), A review of the literature on control and accountability. In: Chapman, C.S., Hopwood, A., Shields, M.D. (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Oxford, Elsevier, pp. 785–803.
  45. Miraglia R.A. (2012), Nuove tendenze nei sistemi di controllo e di misurazione delle performance, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  46. Morsing M., Schultz M. (2006), Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: a European review, 15(4), pp. 323-338.
  47. Noland J., Phillips R. (2010), Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), pp. 39-49.
  48. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R. (2006), The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard business review, 84(12), pp. 78-92.
  49. Porter, M. E., Kramer, MR (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
  50. Raworth K. (2017), L’economia della ciambella. Sette mosse per pensare come un economista del XXI secolo, Edizioni Ambiente.
  51. Marasca S., Marchi L., Riccaboni A. (2013), Controllo di gestione: metodologie e strumenti. Amministrazione, finanza e controllo, Knowita.
  52. Signori S., Rusconi G. (2009), Ethical thinking in traditional Italian Economia Aziendale and the stakeholder management theory: The search for possible interactions, Journal of Business Ethics.
  53. Simons R. (1994), Levers of Control, Harvard Business School Press.
  54. Spetic W., Marquez P., Kozak R. (2012), Critical areas and entry points for sustainability‐related strategies in the sugarcane‐based ethanol industry of Brazil, Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(6), pp. 370-386.
  55. Sustainability Development Goals Fund (2018), The contribution of sports to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals: A toolkit for action.
  56. Torelli R., Balluchi F., Furlotti K. (2020), The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), pp. 470-484.
  57. Van Marrewijk M. (2003), Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion, Journal of business ethics, 44(2-3), pp. 95-105.
  58. Wijethilake C. (2017) ‘Proactive sustainability strategy and corporate sustainability performance: The mediating effect of sustainability control systems’, Journal of Environmental Management, 196, pp. 569-582.
  59. Wijethilake C., Ekanayake A. (2018), Proactive Strategic Responses to Corporate Sustainability Pressures: A Sustainability Control System Framework.
  60. Wijethilake C., Munir R. Appuhami R. (2017), ‘Strategic responses to institutional pressures for sustainability: the role of management control systems’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.

  • Integrated Reporting come sistema manageriale per raggiungere obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile: una verifica empirica Riccardo Santoni, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 1/2023 pp.43
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2023-001003
  • Shaping Tomorrow Alberto Dello Strologo, Edoardo D’Andrassi, Francesca Ventimiglia, pp.69 (ISBN:978-3-031-78998-4)
  • La pianificazione della sostenibilità nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers Ivo Hristov, Antonio Chirico, Francesco Ranalli, Riccardo Camilli, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 3/2022 pp.109
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-003006

Cristiana Buscarini, Fabio Cerroni, Livia Scarnecchia, Il ruolo delle matrici di "Materialità" e di "Performance" per il controllo della sostenibilità in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2/2021, pp 87-106, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2021-002005