Il diritto alla città, cinquant’anni dopo: il ruolo della sociologia urbana

Fifty years after the publication of the first edition of Lefebvre Le droit à la ville, does it still make sense to speak of "right to the city"? Which city should we refer to nowadays? What categories of people are excluded from this right? And also, in what terms does urban sociology pose these questions? In this essay we try, at least partially, to answer these questions, starting with the main core of Lefebvre’s arguments, and then focusing on the most recent debate, by limiting it especially to some important scholars who have recently dealt with the topic, such as Don Mitchell e Peter Marcuse.

Parole chiave:The right to the city; Henri Lefebvre, urban change, urban sociology, new protagonists, city.

• Città, immigrati e forme dello spazio relazionale Carlo Colloca, in SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 133/2024 pp.14
  DOI: 10.3280/SUR2024-133002
• Sperimentare i limiti del possibile, Lefebvre e l'utopia Cassandra Fontana, in SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 118/2019 pp.46
  DOI: 10.3280/SUR2019-118005
• The Role of Relationships in Meaningfully Engaging Youth at Risk in Recreation and Leisure Contexts Tristan D. Hopper, Yoshitaka Iwasaki, Gordon J. Walker, Tara-Leigh F. McHugh, in Child & Youth Services /2019 pp.245
  DOI: 10.1080/0145935X.2019.1568235

Antonietta Mazzette, Il diritto alla città, cinquant’anni dopo: il ruolo della sociologia urbana in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 115/2018, pp 38-56, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2018-115005