La qualità dell’abitare nel PNRR italiano: analisi delle metodologie di valutazione e progettazione del PINQuA

Titolo Rivista ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Autori/Curatori Annunziata Palermo, Lucia Chieffallo, Maria Francesca Viapiana
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/137
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 24 P. 133-156 Dimensione file 204 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2023-137007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’Italia ha posto la sua attenzione alla questione abitativa attraverso specifici strumenti tra i quali il Programma Innovativo Nazionale per la Qualità dell’Abitare (PINQuA) confluito come specifica misura del PNRR. Il saggio fornisce una visione generale del Programma rendendo esplicite le metodologie di valuta- zione e progettazione adottate per facilitare la circolazione di informazioni utili ad incrementare le performance relative alla qualità dell’abitare anche in altri contesti.;

Keywords:PINQuA; PNRR; DNSH; qualità dell’abitare; rigenerazione urbana.

  1. Acolin A. and Green R.K. (2017). Measuring housing affordability in São Paulo metropolitan region: Incorporating location. Cities, 62: 41-49.
  2. Flamant G., Bustamante W., Schmitt C., Bunster V. and Osorio C. (2022). Thermal and environmental evaluation of mid-rise social housing retrofit under different climate conditions. Journal of Building Engineering, 46: 103724.
  3. Giuliani F., De Falco A. and Cutini V. (2021). Unpacking seismic risk in Italian historic centres: A critical overview for disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59: 102260.
  4. Grossmann K. (2019). Using conflicts to uncover injustices in energy transitions: The case of social impacts of energy efficiency policies in the housing sector in Germany. Global Transitions, 1: 148-156.
  5. Henriksson M., Berg J., Lindkvist C. and Lucas K. (2021). Questioning mobility ideals – the value of proximity for residents in socially deprived urban areas in Sweden. Mobilities, 16(5): 792-808.
  6. Jiang Y., Zhao D., Sanderford A. and Du J. (2018). Effects of bank lending on urban housing prices for sustainable development: A Panel Analysis of Chinese Cities. Sustainability, 10(3): 642.
  7. Jiménez-Pacheco J., Quezada R., Calderón-Brito J., Ortega-Guamán E. and García H. (2022). Characterisation of the built heritage of historic centres oriented to the assessment of its seismic vulnerability: The case of Cuenca, Ecuador. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction: 102784.
  8. Karji A., Woldesenbet A., Khanzadi M. and Tafazzoli M. (2019). Assessment of social sustainability indicators in mass housing construction: a case study of Mehr housing project. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50: 101697.
  9. Lane M., van der Horst D., Tingey M., Smith C. and Webb J. (2020). Social innovation in the shadow of policy failure: Energy efficiency in self-build housing. Global Transitions, 2: 180-189.
  10. Laprise M., Lufkin S. and Rey E. (2015). An indicator system for the assessment of sustainability integrated into the project dynamics of regeneration of disused urban areas. Building and Environment, 86: 29-38.
  11. Liu L., Zhao Z., Zhang M. and Zhou D. (2022). Green investment efficiency in the Chinese energy sector: Overinvestment or underinvestment?. Energy Policy, 160: 112694.
  12. Liu Z. and Ma L. (2021). Residential experiences and satisfaction of public housing renters in Beijing, China: A before-after relocation assessment. Cities, 113: 103148.
  13. Ferretti V. and Grosso R. (2019). Designing successful urban regeneration strategies through a behavioral decision aiding approach. Cities, 95: 102386.
  14. Fastofski D.C., González M.A.S. and Kern A.P. (2017). Sustainability analysis of housing developments through the Brazilian environmental rating system Selo Casa Azul. Habitat International, 67: 44-53.
  15. Eldiasty A., Hegazi Y.S. and El-Khouly T. (2021). Using space syntax and TOPSIS to evaluate the conservation of urban heritage sites for possible UNESCO listing the case study of the historic centre of Rosetta, Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(4): 4233-4245.
  16. Domenici G. (2021). Next Generation EU e rinascita dell’Europa. Il Piano Nazionale italiano di Ripresa e Resilienza: verso un nuovo Rinascimento?. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 23: 11-24.
  17. Di Fazio S. e Modica G. (2020). Trasformazione del paesaggio, sistemi insediativi e borghi rurali. ArcHistoR, 7: 504-517. DOI: 10.14633/AHR232
  18. Desvallées L. (2022). Low-carbon retrofits in social housing: Energy efficiency, multidimensional energy poverty, and domestic comfort strategies in southern Europe. Energy Research & Social Science, 85: 102413.
  19. Delgado M.G., Ramos J.S., Amores T.R.P., Medina D.C. and Domínguez S.Á. (2022). Improving habitability in social housing through passive cooling: a case study in Mengíbar (Jaén, Spain). Sustainable Cities and Society, 78: 103642.
  20. Delera A. (2012). Housing Sociale per una nuova morfologia della città. Techne. Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 4: 74-78.
  21. De Feo G., De Gisi S., De Vita S. and Notarnicola M. (2018). Sustainability assessment of alternative end-uses for disused areas based on multi-criteria decision-making method. Science of the Total Environment, 631: 142-152.
  22. D’Onofrio R. and Trusiani E. (2022). The Future of the City in the Name of Proximity: A New Perspective for the Urban Regeneration of Council Housing Suburbs in Italy after the Pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3): 1252.
  23. D’Adamo I., Gastaldi M., Imbriani C. and Morone P. (2021). Assessing regional performance for the Sustainable Development Goals in Italy. Scientific reports, 11(1): 1-10.
  24. Costarelli I. (2020). La gestione dell’housing sociale. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, LI(127): 5-22. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2020-12700
  25. Cilona T. (2021). Cultural and Landscapes Heritages: Mobility, Fruition and Accessibility for all. In: Gambardella C., a cura di, Le Vie dei Mercanti. World Heritage and Design for Health. Roma: Gangemi.
  26. Cerutti P. (2021). Italian National Plan for Recovery and Resilience, water resources, groundwater, hydrogeology. Acque Sotterranee. Italian Journal of Groundwater, 10(2): 84-85.
  27. Cellamare C. (2022). PNRR: rigenerazione urbana e housing. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, LIII(135): 183-201. DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2022-13500
  28. Cellamare C. (2018). Nuove forme dell’urbano e processi di riappropriazione delle città. In: Bertoni A. e Piccioni L., a cura di, Raccontare, leggere e immaginare la città contemporanea. Firenze: Casa Editrice Olschki.
  29. Buti M. e Messori M. (2020). Come finalizzare il Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza dell’Italia. Rivista di politica economica, 2: 161-183.
  30. Broers W., Kemp R., Vasseur V., Abujidi N. and Vroon Z. (2022). Justice in social housing: Towards a people-centred energy renovation process. Energy Research & Social Science, 88: 102527.
  31. Boisseuil C. (2019). Governing ambiguity and implementing cross-sectoral programmes: urban regeneration for social mix in Paris. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34(2): 425-440.
  32. Battis-Schinker E., Al-Alawi S., Knippschild R., Gmur K., Książek S., Kukuła M. and Belof M. (2021). Towards quality of life indicators for historic urban landscapes – Insight into a German-Polish research project. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10: 100094.
  33. Avanzini M., Pinheiro M.D., Gomes R. and Rolim C. (2022). Energy retrofit as an answer to public health costs of fuel poverty in Lisbon social housing. Energy Policy, 160: 112658.
  34. Ascoli U. e Campedelli M. (2021). Insostituibilità, riconoscenza, integrazione funzionale: la parabola del Terzo Settore nella pandemia. Social Policies, 8(2): 369-388. DOI: 10.7389/10168
  35. Allegra M. and Maggor E. (2022). The metropolitanization of Israel’s settlement policy: The colonization of the West Bank as a strategy of spatial restructuring. Political Geography, 92: 102513.
  36. Adabre M.A., Chan A.P., Edwards D.J. and Osei-Kyei R. (2022). To build or not to build, that is the uncertainty: Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of risks for sustainable housing in developing economies. Cities, 125: 103644.
  37. McNee G. and Pojani D. (2021). NIMBYism as a barrier to housing and social mix in San Francisco. Journal of housing and the built environment, 37: 553-573.
  38. Martínez C.F., Hodgson F., Mullen C. and Timms P. (2018). Creating inequality in accessibility: The relationships between public transport and social housing policy in deprived areas of Santiago de Chile. Journal of Transport Geography, 67: 102-109.
  39. Medrano-Gómez L.E. and Izquierdo A.E. (2017). Social housing retrofit: Improving energy efficiency and thermal comfort for the housing stock recovery in Mexico. Energy Procedia, 121: 41-48.
  40. Mendell A.Y., Mahdavi A. and Siegel J.A. (2022). Particulate matter concentrations in social housing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 76: 103503.
  41. Menegus G. (2021). The Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP) and the role of regions and local entities. Revista “Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad”, 22: 21-27.
  42. Mete S. and Xue J. (2021). Integrating environmental sustainability and social justice in housing development: two contrasting scenarios. Progress in Planning, 151: 100504.
  43. Moschella M. e Verzichelli L. (2021). Il sistema politico italiano alla prova del Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 16(3): 333-352. DOI: 10.1483/10215
  44. Muczyński A., Zwirowicz-Rutkowska A. and da Costa J.N. (2022). Supporting tenant relocation in social housing management: development of the dedicated geoinformation system in Poland. Cities, 120: 103431.
  45. Obianyo I.I., Ihekweme G.O., Mahamat A.A., Onyelowe K.C., Onwualu A.P. andSoboyejo A.B. (2021). Overcoming the obstacles to sustainable housing and urban development in Nigeria: The role of research and innovation. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4: 100226.
  46. Perriccioli M. (2014). Re-cycling social housing. Strumenti, metodi, strategie progettuali per l’innovazione dell’Edilizia Residenziale Sociale. TECHNE: Journal of Technology for Architecture & Environment, 7: 33-40.
  47. Piaggio M. (2021). The value of public urban green spaces: Measuring the effects of proximity to and size of urban green spaces on housing market values in San José, Costa Rica. Land Use Policy, 109: 105656.
  48. Pianta M. e Lucchese M. (2021). Il Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza in una prospettiva di politica industriale. Moneta e Credito, 74(294): 177-190. DOI: 10.13133/2037-3651/1760
  49. Preciado-Pérez O.A. and Fotios S. (2017). Comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of energy efficiency in social housing. Case study: Northwest Mexico. Energy and Buildings, 152: 279-289.
  50. Preval N., Randal E., Chapman R., Moores J. and Howden-Chapman P. (2016). Streamlining urban housing development: Are there environmental sustainability impacts?. Cities, 55: 101-112.
  51. Profeti S. e Baldi B. (2021). Le regioni italiane e il PNRR: la (vana) ricerca di canali d’accesso all’agenda. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 16(3): 432-457. DOI: 10.1483/10215
  52. Raynor K., Panza L., Ordóñez C., Adamovic M. and Wheeler M.A. (2020). Does social mix reduce stigma in public housing? A comparative analysis of two housing estates in Melbourne. Cities, 96: 102458.
  53. Romão X. and Bertolin C. (2022). Risk protection for cultural heritage and historic centres: Current knowledge and further research needs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 67: 102652.
  54. Seo B.K. (2022). Co-creation of knowledge in the urban planning context: The case of participatory planning for transitional social housing in Hong Kong. Cities, 122: 103518.
  55. Serikawa M., Satoh M., Umishio W., Kawakubo S., Nakano J., Akimoto T., Ikaga
  56. Triana M.A., Lamberts R. and Sassi P. (2018). Should we consider climate change for Brazilian social housing? Assessment of energy efficiency adaptation measures. Energy and Buildings, 158: 1379-1392.
  57. Viesti G. (2023). Riuscirà il Pnrr a rilanciare l’Italia?. Roma: Donzelli.
  58. Winston N. (2009). Urban regeneration for sustainable development: the role of sustainable housing?. European Planning Studies, 17(12): 1781-1796. DOI: 10.1080/0965431090332230
  59. Winston N. and Pareja Eastaway M. (2008). Sustainable housing in the urban context: international sustainable development indicator sets and housing. Social Indicators Research, 87(2): 211-221.
  60. Won J. and Lee J.S. (2020). Impact of residential environments on social capital and health outcomes among public rental housing residents in Seoul, South Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203: 103882.
  61. Zambon I. and Salvati L. (2019). Metropolitan growth, urban cycles and housing in a Mediterranean country, 1910s-2010s. Cities, 95: 102412.
  62. T. and Murakami S. (2022). Quantitative Evaluation of the Contributions of Improved Housing Performances toward Delivering Sustainable Development Goals by a Building Energy Simulation Tool. Sustainable Cities and Society, 103701.
  63. Sgobbo A. (2021). Politiche insediative e sostenibilità urbana. BDC. Bollettino Del Centro Calza Bini, 21(1): 19-44. DOI: 10.6092/2284-4732/798
  64. Sharafeddin A. and Arocho I. (2022). Toward sustainable public housing: A comparison of social aspects in public housing in the United State and Libya. Habitat International, 122: 102513.
  65. Sosa M.B., Correa E.N. and Cantón M.A. (2018). Neighborhood designs for low-density social housing energy efficiency: Case study of an arid city in Argentina. Energy and Buildings, 168: 137-146.
  66. Soyinka O. and Siu K.W.M. (2018). Urban informality, housing insecurity, and social exclusion; concept and case study assessment for sustainable urban development. City, culture and society, 15: 23-36.
  67. Thadani H.L. and Go Y.I. (2021). Integration of solar energy into low-cost housing for sustainable development: case study in developing countries. Heliyon, 7(12): e08513.

Annunziata Palermo, Lucia Chieffallo, Maria Francesca Viapiana, La qualità dell’abitare nel PNRR italiano: analisi delle metodologie di valutazione e progettazione del PINQuA in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 137/2023, pp 133-156, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2023-137007