Formulare e utilizzare le storie: un esempio di ricerca qualitativa

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Alice Spada, Fabio Gaspani
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/127
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 18 P. 18-98 Dimensione file 211 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2022-127005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

;

  1. R. Hughes (2008), Vignettes, in L.M. Given (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Rese- arch Methods, London, Sage.
  2. R. Hughes, M. Huby (2004), «The Construction and Interpretation of Vignettes in Social Re- search», Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11, 1, pp. 36-51,
  3. M. Jackson, P. Harrison, B. Swinburn, M. Lawrence (2015), «Using a Qualitative Vignette to Explore a Complex Public Health Issue», Qualitative Health Research, 25, 10, pp. 1395- 409, DOI: 10.1177/1049732315570119
  4. N. Jenkins, M. Bloor, J. Fischer, L. Berney, J. Neale (2010), «Putting it in Context: The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Interviewing», Qualitative Research, 10, 20, pp. 175-98, DOI: 10.1177/1468794109356737
  5. H.N. Kopnina (2014), «Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Exploring Children’s Moral Reasoning about Sustainable Development and Environment through Vignettes», Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, pp. 124-32,
  6. D. Leonardi (2021), «How to Use the Vignette Technique to Uncover Judgments, Values, Relationships with Norms. Methodological Reflections from a Research Project on Pro- fessional Discretion», Sociologia Italiana – AIS Journal of Sociology, 18, pp. 53-68, DOI: 10.1485/2281-2652-202118-3
  7. L. Leung (2015), «Validity, Reliability, and Generalizability in Qualitative Research», Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4, 3, pp. 324-7, DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.161306
  8. A. Marradi (2005), Raccontar storie. Un nuovo metodo per indagare sui valori, Roma, Carocci. Miur – Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (2012), Regolamento recante indicazioni nazionali per il curricolo della scuola dell’infanzia e del primo ciclo d’istruzione, a norma dell’articolo 1, comma 4, del decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 20 marzo 2009, n. 89, DM n. 254/2012.
  9. L. O’Dell, S. Crafter, G. de Abreu, T. Cline (2012), «The Problem of Interpretation in Vignette Methodology in Research with Young People», Qualitative Research, 12, 6, pp. 702-71, DOI: 10.1177/1468794112439003
  10. Parlamento Europeo (2006), Raccomandazione del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 18 dicembre 2006, sulle competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente, 2006/962/CE.
  11. M. Pellerey (2010), Competenze. Conoscenze, abilità, atteggiamenti, Napoli, Tecnodid.
  12. M. Poulou M. (2001), «The Role of Vignettes in the Research of Emotional and Beha- vioural Difficulties», Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 6, 1, pp. 50-62, DOI: 10.1080/13632750100507655
  13. J. Przeperski, B. Taylor (2020), «Cooperation in Child Welfare Decision Making: Qualitative Vignette Study», Child Care in Practice, pp. 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/13575279.2019.1701412
  14. A. Reisel (2017), «Practitioners’ Perceptions and Decision‐Making Regarding Child Sexual Exploitation – a Qualitative Vignette Study», Child & Family Social Work, 22, 3, pp. 1292- 301,
  15. H. Sampson, I.A. Johannessen (2019), «Turning on the Tap: the Benefits of Using ‘Real-Life’ Vignettes in Qualitative Research Interviews», Qualitative Research, 20, 1, pp. 56-72, DOI: 10.1177/1468794118816618
  16. C. Seale (1999), The Quality of Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  17. D. Silverman (2014), Interpreting Qualitative Data, London, Sage.
  18. R.A.Jr Singleton, B.C. Straits (2012), Survey Interviewing, in J.F. Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, A.B. Marvasti, K.D. McKinney (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Interview Research: The Comple- xity of the Craft, London, Sage.
  19. K. Skilling, G.J. Stylianides (2020), «Using Vignettes in Educational Research: a Framework for Vignette Construction», International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43, 5, pp. 541-556, DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2019.1704243
  20. A. Spada (2022), Understanding the Effects of the Standardisation of Social Competences in the Italian Educational System: Teachers’ Conceptions in a Context of Normative Inde- terminacy, in H. Riese, L.T. Hilt, G.E. Søreide (eds.), Educational Standardisation in a Complex World, Bingley, Emerald Publishing Limited.
  21. N. Spalding, T. Phillips (2007), «Exploring the Use of Vignettes: from Validity to Trustworthi- ness», Qualitative Health Research, 17, 7, pp. 954-62, DOI: 10.1177/1049732307306187
  22. B.H. Spitzberg, G. Changnon (2009), Conceptualizing Intercultural Competence, in D.K. Dear-
  23. dorff (ed.), The Sage Handbook of Intercultural Competence, London, Sage.
  24. B.H. Spitzberg, W.R. Cupach (1988), Handbook of Interpersonal Competence Research, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag.
  25. B.H. Spitzberg, W.R. Cupach (2012), Interpersonal Skills, in M.L. Knapp, J.A. Daly (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, London, Sage.
  26. G. Ten Dam, M. Volman (2003), «A Life Jacket or an Art of Living: Inequality in Social Compe- tence Education», Curriculum Inquiry, 33, 2, pp. 117-37, DOI: 10.1111/1467-873X.00254
  27. J. Törrönen (2002), «Semiotic Theory on Qualitative Interviewing using Stimulus Texts», Qua- litative Research, 2, 3, pp. 343-62, DOI: 10.1177/146879410200200304
  28. Unicef – United Nations International Children’s Fund (2012), Global Evaluation of Life Skills Education Programmes, New York.
  29. W.R. Veal (2002), «Content Specific Vignettes as Tools for Research and Teaching», The Elec- tronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 6, 4, pp. 1-37.
  30. K.D. Wason, M.J. Polonsky, M.R. Hyman (2002), «Designing Vignette Studies in Marketing», Australasian Marketing Journal, 10, 3, pp. 41-58, DOI: 10.1016/S1441-3582(02)70157-2
  31. P. West (1982), Reproducing Naturally Occurring Stories: Vignettes in Survey Research, Mrc Medical Sociology Unit.
  32. A. Zwaans, I. van der Veen, M. Volman, G. Ten Dam (2008), «Social Competence as an Educa- tional Goal: the Role of the Ethnic Composition and the Urban Environment of the School», Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 8, pp. 2118-131,
  33. K. Howard, M. Swanson, P.S. Campbell (2014), «The Diversification of Music Teacher Edu- cation: Six Vignettes from a Movement in Progress», Journal of Music Teacher Education, 24, 1, pp. 26-37, DOI: 10.1177/1057083713494011
  34. A.W.M. Hoogveld, F. Paas, W.M.G. Jochems (2005), «Training Higher Education Teachers for Instructional Design of Competency-Based Education: Product-Oriented versus Process- Oriented Worked Examples», Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 3, pp. 287-97,
  35. M. Hammersley (1987), «Some Notes on the Terms “Validity” and “Reliability”», British Edu- cational Research Journal, 13, 1, pp. 73-82, DOI: 10.1080/0141192870130107
  36. J. Hainmueller, D. Hangartner, T. Yamamoto (2015), «Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments against Real-World Behavior», Proceedings of the National Academy of Scien- ces of the United States of America, 112, 8, pp. 2395-2400,
  37. N. Golafshani (2003), «Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research», The Qualitative Report, 8, 4, pp. 597-607.
  38. U. Flick (2008), Managing Quality in Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  39. R.E. Fish (2017), «The Racialized Construction of Exceptionality: Experimental Evidence of Race/Ethnicity Effects on Teachers’ Interventions», Social Science Research, 62, pp. 317- 334,
  40. G. Desautels, S. Jacob (2012), «The Ethical Sensitivity of Evaluators: A Qualitative Study Using a Vignette Design», Evaluation, 18, 4, pp. 437-50, DOI: 10.1177/1356389012461192
  41. S.A. Denham, K.A. Blair, E. DeMulder, J. Levitas, K. Sawyer, S. Auerbach-Major, P. Queenan (2003), «Preschool Emotional Competence: Pathway to Social Competence?», Child De- velopment, 74, 1, pp. 238-56, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00533
  42. D.K. Crawford, R.J. Bodine (2001), «Conflict Resolution Education: Preparing Youth for the Future», Juvenile Justice, 8, pp. 21-29, -- https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ juvejstc8&i=21.
  43. P. Corbetta (1999), Metodologia e tecniche della ricerca sociale, Bologna, il Mulino.
  44. M. Cardano (2011), La ricerca qualitativa, Bologna, il Mulino.
  45. S. Brinkmann (2014), Unstructured and Semi-Structured Interviewing, in P. Leavy (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  46. G.J. Botvin (1996), Through Life Skills Training, in R.D. Peters, R.J. McMahon (eds.), Preventing Childhood Disorders, Substance Abuse and Delinquency, London, Sage.
  47. M. Bloor, F. Wood (2006), Keywords in Qualitative Methods. A Vocabulary of Research Con- cepts, London, Sage.
  48. R. Bichi (2000b), «La tecnica di intervista nelle storie di vita: il rimando neutro, forme e mo- dalità di riconoscimento tra aree di significato», Studi di Sociologia, 38, 2, pp. 175-188, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23004851.
  49. R. Bichi (2000a), «Il trattamento del testo parlato: questioni aperte nell’analisi del materiale non- standard», Studi di Sociologia, 38, 4, pp. 387-399, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23004972.
  50. K.C. Barton (2015), «Elicitation Techniques: Getting People to Talk About Ideas They Don’t Usually Talk About», Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 2, pp. 179-205, DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2015.1034392
  51. C. Barter, E. Renold (1999), «The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research», Social Research Update, 25, 9, pp. 1-6.
  52. W. Aujla (2020), «Using a Vignette in Qualitative Research to Explore Police Perspectives of a Sensitive Topic: “Honor”-Based Crimes and Forced Marriages», International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, pp. 1-10, DOI: 10.1177/1609406919898352
  53. C. Atzmüller, P.M. Steiner (2010), «Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research», Me- thodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6, 3, pp. 128-138,
  54. C. Anast Seguin, A.L. Ambrosio (2002), «Multicultural Vignettes for Teacher Preparation», Multicultural Perspectives, 4, 4, pp. 10-6, DOI: 10.1207/S15327892MCP0404_3
  55. C.S. Alexander, H.J. Becker (1978), «The Use of Vignettes in Survey Research», Public Opi- nion Quarterly, 42, 1, pp. 93-104, DOI: 10.1086/268432
  56. F.H. Al Sadi, T.N. Basit (2017), «“I have Just Understood it from the Story…”: Using Vignettes in Educational Research to Investigate Cultural Tolerance», Research Papers in Education, 32, 2, pp. 183-196, DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1158858

Alice Spada, Fabio Gaspani, Formulare e utilizzare le storie: un esempio di ricerca qualitativa in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 127/2022, pp 18-98, DOI: 10.3280/SR2022-127005