The ambiguity of norms. Steps towards a new pragmatic anthropology

Titolo Rivista PARADIGMI
Autori/Curatori Rosa M. Calcaterra
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2016/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 87-102 Dimensione file 177 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2016-003006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The paper aims at indicating the relevance of the issue of normativity for the construction of a "new" philosophical anthropology focused on the pragmatic criteria embedded with classical pragmatism, late Wittgenstein’s philosophy, and neo-pragmatism alike. In particular, their common project of putting aside the traditional foundationalism will be considered in order to checking whether and how is it possible to picture an image of the human being that eludes the narrow path of traditional metaphysics without however falling prey of a theoretical outlook fostering epistemic and ethical skepticism. Accordingly, the paper concentrates on R. Rorty’s "linguistic pragmatism" since it allows to tackle some pivotal questions about the philosophical-anthropological pragmatist and Wittgenstein’s orientation. In particular, the following two intertwined questions will be addressed: (1) what is the anthropologically relevant point in Rorty’s attempt to shift the very focus of pragmatist philosophy from the concept of experience to that of language? (2) Which kind of anthropological contribution should we grant to his defense of contingentism as against transcendentalism/metaphysics, and specifically to the theme of the change in vocabularies?

L’articolo intende mostrare la rilevanza della questione della normatività rispetto alla costruzione di una "nuova" antropologia pragmatica che possa attingere ad elementi condivisi dal pragmatismo classico, dalla filosofia di Wittgenstein e dal neo-pragmatismo. In particolare, si discute la possibilità e le eventuali modalità in cui il loro comune progetto di accantonare il fondazionalismo moderno consenta di delineare un’immagine dell’essere umano che eviti le strettoie della metafisica tradizionale senza tuttavia cedere ad una visuale scettica delle norme epistemiche e valoriali. Pertanto verrà data specifica attenzione al "pragmatismo linguistico" di Rorty, proprio in quanto esso consente di affrontare alcune questioni cruciali per un’antropologia filosofica di orientamento pragmatista e wittgensteiniano

Keywords:Normatività, Antropologia pragmatica, Rorty, Wittgenstein, Contingentismo.

  1. Baggio G. (2015). La mente bio-sociale. Filosofia e psicologia in G. H. Mead, Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
  2. Bernstein R.J. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
  3. Brandom R.B. (2011). Perspectives on pragmatism. Classical, recent & contemporary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Calcaterra R.M. (2003). Pragmatismo: i valori dell’esperienza. Letture di Peirce, James, Mead. Roma: Carocci.
  5. Calcaterra R.M. (2014). The linguistic world. Rorty’s aesthetic meliorism. In: Koczanowicz L., ed. Beauty, responsibility, and politics. Ethical and political consequences of pragmatist aesthetics. New York-Amsterdam: Rodopi: 93-109.
  6. Calcaterra R.M. (2015a). Reality in practice. Esercizi filosofici, 10, 1: 36-153.
  7. Calcaterra R.M. (2015b). Constructing on contingency: William James from biology to ethics and politics. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 16, 2: 219-232.
  8. Dewey J. (1925). Experience and nature. In The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, ed. by Jo Ann Boydston, Vol. 1. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1981.
  9. Dewey J. (1938). Logic: the theory of inquiry. In: The later works of John Dewey, 1925-1953, ed. by Jo Ann Boydston, vol. 12. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986 (LW).
  10. Dreon R. (2014). Dewey on language. Elements for a non-dualistic approach. In: Hildebrand D., ed. Language or experience. Charting pragmatism’s course for the 21st century. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 6, 2: 109-124.
  11. Frega R. (2015). The normative structure of the ordinary. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VII, 1:54-76.
  12. Hildebrand D. (2011). Could experience be more than a method? Dewey’s practical starting point. In: Frega R., ed. Pragmatist epistemologies. Lanham: Lexington: 41-60.
  13. Hildebrand D., ed. (2014). Language or experience. Charting pragmatism’s course for the 21st century. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 6, 2.
  14. James W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Volume I. In: Burkhardt F. H., Bowers F., Skrupskelis I. K., eds. The works of William James, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1981.
  15. James W. (1907). Pragmatism, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1975 (trad. it.: Pragmatismo, a cura di S. Franzese. Milano: Nino Aragno Editore, 2007).
  16. James W. (1909). The meaning of truth, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 1975 (trad. it.: Il significato della verità. Una prosecuzione di pragmatismo. Torino: Nino Aragno Editore, 2010).
  17. Koopman C. (2011). Rorty’s linguistic turn. Why (more than) language matters to philosophy. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8, 1: 61-84.
  18. Marchetti G. (2013). Fatti e valori della conoscenza. Fine di una dicotomia. In: Marchetti G. (a cura di). La contingenza dei fatti e l’oggettività dei valori. Milano-Udine: Mimesis: 11-38.
  19. Marchetti S. (2016). Brandom and pragmatism. Remarks on a still open question. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 24, 1: 29-139, DOI: 10.1080/09672559.2015.1129738
  20. Margolis J. (2014). Richard Rorty contra Rorty and John Dewey. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, VI, 2: 91-108.
  21. Peirce Ch. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In: Hartshorne C. and Weiss P., eds. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume 5: Pragmatism and pragmaticism, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1934 (CP).
  22. Peirce Ch. S. (1934). A survey of pragmaticism. In: Hartshorne C. and Weiss P., eds. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume 5: Pragmatism and pragmaticism, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (CP).
  23. Pippin R. (1999). Modernism as a philosophical problem. On the dissatisfactions of European high culture, Oxford: Blackwell.
  24. Rorty R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (trad. it.: Conseguenze del pragmatismo. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1986).
  25. Rorty R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Rorty R. (1996). Anti-authoritarianism in epistemology and ethics. Ferrater Mora Lectures at the University of Girona (Spain).
  27. Rorty R. (1999). Education as socialization and as individualization. Philosophy and Social Hope, London: Penguin.
  28. Rorty R. (2000). Response to Bjorn Ramberg. In: Brandom R., ed. Rorty and his critics. Malden: Blackwell.
  29. Shusterman R. (20002). Pragmatist aesthetics. Living beauty, rethinking art. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
  30. Wittgenstein L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Philosophical investigations, ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, Oxford: Blackwell (trad. it.: R. Piovesan, M. Trinchero, a cura di. Ricerche filosofiche, Torino: Einaudi, 1999).
  31. Wittgenstein L. (1974). On certainty, ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.

Rosa M. Calcaterra, The ambiguity of norms. Steps towards a new pragmatic anthropology in "PARADIGMI" 3/2016, pp 87-102, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2016-003006