The evolution of person-centred care to personalised care, personal budgets and direct payments in england: some implications for older users of social care services

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI
Autori/Curatori John Woolham, Guy Daly, Nicole Steils, Katrina Ritters
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 18 P. 145-162 Dimensione file 102 KB
DOI 10.3280/SP2015-001008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The Westminster Government in the UK has implemented a series of significant changes to the way social care is organised and provided in England, including the use of personal budgets and direct payments. Advocates of this approach claim it will deliver more personalised care to budget holders. This paper examines key English policies underpinning these changes, reviewing social policy analysis and research evidence of their impact to consider implications for older social care users. It suggests that personal budgets and direct payments have partly been a response to demands for greater control over care from younger adults with disabilities and that policies and guidance often reflect the interests of this constituency rather than older people. Current research evidence tends to suggest that older people achieve less satisfactory outcomes from personal budgets than younger people. The paper argues for the re-discovery of person-centred care, rather than personalisation, as a way of addressing this important policy issue.;

Keywords:Direct Payments; Older People; Person-centred Care; Personal Budgets; Personalisation

  1. ADASS (Association of Directors of Adult Social Services). 2009. Press release.
  2. — 2011. Personal Budgets Survey March 2011: The results.
  3. Arksey, H. and P. Kemp 2008. Dimensions of Choice. York: Social Policy Research Unit.
  4. Audit Commission 2006 Choosing Well, London, Audit Commission.
  5. — 2010. Financial Management of Personal Budgets: Challenges and Opportunities for Local Councils. London: The Audit Commission.
  6. Barnes, M. 2011. Abandoning Care? A Critical Perspective on Personalisation from an Ethic of Care. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, pp. 153-167., DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2010.48426
  7. Beresford, P. 2008. Time to Get Real about Personalisation. Journal of Integrated Care, 16, 2: 2-4., DOI: 10.1108/1476901820080001
  8. — 2009a. Social Care, personalisation and service users: addressing the ambiguities. Research, Policy and Planning, 27, 2: 73-84.
  9. — 2009b. Whose Personalisation? Compass: Direction for the Democratic Left Think Pieces, 47, pp. 1-5.
  10. — 2012. Are Personal Budgets necessarily empowering for service users? If not, what’s it all about? Research, Policy and Planning, 29, 1, pp. 37-45.
  11. Boyle, D. 2013. The Barriers to Choice Review. How are people using choice in public services? London: Ipsos MORI.
  12. Brechin, A. and J. Swain 1987. Changing Relationships: Shared Action Planning with People with a Mental Handicap. London: Harper Row.
  13. Brindle, D. 2011. Are direct payments for social care still living up to their name? Society Guardian, June 22, p. 4.
  14. Carr, S. 2007. Choice, Control and Individual Budgets: emerging themes. Research Briefing 20, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  15. Carr, S. and D. Robbins 2009. The implementation of individual budget schemes in adult social care. SCIE Research Briefing 20. London: The Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  16. Carr, S. and R. Dittrich 2008. Personalisation: A Rough Guide. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  17. Challis, D. and B. Davies 1980. A new approach to Community Care for the Elderly. British Journal of Social Work, 10: 1-18.
  18. — 1986. Case Management in Community Care. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  19. Clarke, J. 2005. New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilised, Abandoned? Critical Social Policy, 25, 4, pp. 447-463, DOI: 10.1177/0261018305057024.—2010.UnsettledConnections,Citizens,consumersandthereformofpublicservices.JournalofConsumerCulture,7,2,pp.159-178Clarke,J.,N.SmithandE.Vidler2006.TheIndeterminacyofChoice:Political,PolicyandOrganisationalImplications.SocialPolicyandSociety,5,3,pp.327-336.,DOI:10.1017/S147474640600301
  20. Clarke, J., J. Newman J and L. Westmarland 2008. The Antagonisms of Choice: New Labour and the reform of public services. Social Policy and Society, 7, 2, pp. 245-253, DOI: 10.1017/S147474640700419
  21. Daly, G. 2012. Citizenship, choice and care: an examination of the promotion of choice in the provision of adult social care. Research, Policy and Planning, 29, 3, pp. 179-190.
  22. Davey, V., J.- L. Fernandez, M. Knapp, N. Vick, D. Jolly, P. Swift, R. Tobin, J. Kendall, J. Ferrie, C. Pearson, G. Mercer and M. Priestley 2007. Direct Payments: A national survey of policy and practice. London: PSSRU, LSE.
  23. Department of Health 1989. Caring for People: Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond, Cm849. London: HSMO.
  24. — 1997. Community Care (Direct Payments) Act 1996, Local Authority Circular (97)11. London: Department of Health.
  25. — 2005. Independence, Wellbeing and Choice: Our vision for the future of social care for adults in England, Gateway ref. 3448. London: Department of Health.
  26. — 2008a. Transforming Social Care, Local Authority Circular letter 2008 (1), Gateway ref. 9337. London: Department of Health.
  27. — 2008b. Making personal budgets work for older people: developing experience, Gateway ref. 10733. London: Department of Health.
  28. — 2009a. Transforming Adult Social Care, Local Authority Circular letter 2009 (1), Gateway ref. 11236. London: Department of Health.
  29. — 2009b Shaping the future of care together. London, Department of Health. ISBN: 978 0 10 176732 3
  30. — 2010. A Vision for Adult Social Care: Capable Communities and Active Citizens. London: Department of Health.
  31. Duffy, S. 2006. Keys to citizenship: a guide to getting good support for people with learning disabilities. Birkenhead, Paradigm Ltd.
  32. — 2008. Personalisation in Social Care. Consumer Policy Review, 18, 5, pp. 132-136.
  33. Duffy, S. and J. Waters 2008. The Economics of Self Directed Support. In C. Poll and S. Duffy, eds., A Report on in Control’s Second Phase Evaluation and Learning 2005-2007, 45-56. London: In Control Publications.
  34. Dunning, J. 2011. Special Report: Personalisation. Community Care, May 26, pp. 4-5.
  35. Dwyer, P. 2010. Understanding Social Citizenship: Issues for Policy and Practice.
  36. [2nd ed.], Bristol: The Policy Press. Ellis K. 2007. Direct Payments and Social Work Practice: The Significance of ‘Street level Bureaucracy’ in Determining Eligibility. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 3: 405-422., DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm01
  37. Ferguson, I. 2007. Increasing User Choice or Privatising Risk? The Antinomies of Personalization. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 3: 387-403. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcm01
  38. Ferguson, P. 2011. In Control Research and evaluation.
  39. Fighting Monsters (2010) The Disgrace of Individual Budgets, Sept 22.
  40. Glasby, J. 2014. The controversies of choice and control: why some people might be hostile to English social care reforms. British Journal of Social Work, 44, 2, pp. 252-266. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs125
  41. Glasby, J. and R. Littlechild 2006. An overview of the Implementation and development of Direct Payments. In J. Leece and J. Bornat, eds., Developments in Direct Payments, pp. 19-32. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  42. Glasby, J. and P. Beresford 2006. Who Knows Best? Evidence-based practice and the service user contribution. Critical Social Policy, 26, 1, pp. 268-284., DOI: 10.1177/026101830605977
  43. Glendinning, C., D. Challis, J. L. Fernandez, S. Jacobs, K. Jones, M. Knapp, J. Manthorpe, N. Moran, A. Netten, M. Stevens and M. Wilberforce 2008.
  44. IBSEN: Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme, Final Report. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.
  45. Hatton, C., J. Waters, S. Duffy, J. Senker, N. Crosby, C. Poll, A. Tyson, J. O’Brien and D. Towell 2008. A report on In Control’s Second Phase Evaluation and Learning 2005-2007. London: In Control Publications.
  46. Hatton, C. and J. Waters J. 2011. The National Personal Budget Survey. London: In Control and Lancaster University.
  47. HSCIC (Health and Social Care Information Centre) 2013. Personal Social Services: Expenditure and Unit Costs, England, 2012-13.
  48. Henwood, M. and B. Hudson 2007. Here to stay? Self-directed support: aspiration and implementation: a review for the Department of Health. Northants: Melanie Henwood Associates.
  49. H.M. Government 2007. Putting People First: A Shared Vision and Commitment to the Transformation of Adult Social Care. London: H.M. Government.
  50. — (2009) Shaping the Future of Care Together. Green Paper, Gateway ref. 1774. Norwich: TSO.
  51. In Control 2014 homepage
  52. Kitwood T. 1997. Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  53. Leadbeater C. 2004. Personalisation through participation: a new script for public services. London: Demos Leadbeater, C., J. Bartlett and N. Gallagher 2008. Making it Personal. London: Demos.
  54. Lloyd, L. 2010. The Individual in Social Care: The ethics of care and the ‘Personalisation Agenda’ in services for older people in England. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4, 2, 188-200., DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2010.48426
  55. MacDonald, G., B. Sheldon and J. Gillespie 1992. Contemporary Studies of the Effectiveness of Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 22, 6: 615-643.
  56. Manthorpe, J., J. Hindes, S. Martineau, M. Cornes, J. Ridley, H. Spandler, A. Rosengard, S. Hunter, S. Little and B. Gray 2011. Self-Directed Support: A review of the Barriers and Facilitators. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Social Research.
  57. Morris, J. 2006. Independent living: the role of the disability movement in the development of Government policy. In C. Glendinning and P. Kemp, eds., Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the welfare state, pp. 235-246, Bristol: The Policy Press.
  58. Newbronner, L., R. Chamberlain, K. Bosanquet, C. Bartlett, B. Sass and C. Glendinning 2011. Keeping Personal Budgets Personal: learning from the experiences of older people, people with mental health problems and their carers, Adult Services report 40. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  59. Office of Fair Trading 2010. Choice and Competition in Public Services: A guide for policy makers. A report prepared for the OFT by Frontier Economics, OFT1214. London: Office of Fair Trading.
  60. Orellana, K. 2012. Personalisation in Practice: lessons from experience: Making Personal Budgets, support planning and brokerage work for people in later life. London: Age UK.
  61. Pawson, R., A. Boaz, L. Grayson, A. Long and C. Barnes. 2003. Types and quality of knowledge in social care. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  62. Poll, C., S. Duffy, C. Hatton, H. Sanderson and M. Routledge 2006. A Report on In Control’s first phase 2003-2005. London: In Control Publications.
  63. Rummery, K. 2011. A comparative analysis of personalisation: balancing an ethic of care with user empowerment. Ethics and Social Welfare, 5, 2, pp. 138-152., DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2011.57106
  64. Roulstone, A. and H. Morgan 2009. Neo-Liberal Individualism or Self Directed Support: Are we all speaking the same language on modernising adult social care? Social Policy and Society, 8, 3, pp. 333-345, DOI: 10.1017/S1471746409004886
  65. Schwartz, B. 2005. The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: Harper Row.
  66. Salecl, R. 2010. Choice. London: Profile Books.
  67. Smith, R. 2010. ‘Paul Burstow: Personal Budget Take-up Is a Disgrace’. Community care online, Sept 22.
  68. Spicker, P. 2013. Personalisation Falls Short. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 7: pp. 1259-1275., DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs063
  69. Think Local Act Personal 2009. Individual Budgets Evaluation Department of Health press release.
  70. Tyson, A. 2008. Service Providers and Commissioners. In C. Poll and S. Duffy, eds., A Report on In Control’s Second Phase Evaluation and Learning 2005-2007, pp. 111-120. London: In Control Publications.
  71. Woolham, J. & C. Benton 2013. The Costs and Benefits of Personal Budgets for Older People: Evidence from a Single Local Authority. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 8, pp. 1472-1491., DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bct20
  72. Zamfir, M. 2013. Personalisation through Personal Budgets: its Effectiveness for Older Adults in Social Care Services. Findings from an English based literature review. Research, Policy and Planning, 30, 2, pp. 77-90.
  73. Zarb, G. and P. Nadash 1994. Cashing in on Independence. London: British Council of Organisations of Disabled People.

  • L’avenir des Silver Tech John Woolham, Nicole Steils, pp.75 (ISBN:9782810906475)
  • Social care managers and care workers’ understandings of personalisation in older people’s services Martin Stevens, Jo Moriarty, Jess Harris, Jill Manthorpe, Shereen Hussein, Michelle Cornes, in Working with Older People /2019 pp.37
    DOI: 10.1108/WWOP-11-2018-0022

John Woolham, Guy Daly, Nicole Steils, Katrina Ritters, The evolution of person-centred care to personalised care, personal budgets and direct payments in england: some implications for older users of social care services in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 1/2015, pp 145-162, DOI: 10.3280/SP2015-001008