Rappresentazioni discorsive dell’impegno domestico e familiare in madri e padri che lavorano

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 26 P. 9-34 Dimensione file 268 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2014-001001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Negli ultimi decenni abbiamo assistito ad un massiccio ingresso delle donne nel mondo del lavoro. Questo fenomeno ha comportato sostanziali riorganizzazioni nella vita familiare e nei modi con cui le persone impiegano il loro tempo suddividendolo fra lavoro pagato, tempo libero e attivita familiari. La pressione temporale causata dal coordinare tali diverse attivita e particolarmente pesante nel caso delle famiglie con figli in cui entrambi i genitori lavorano. L’articolo si inserisce in una linea di ricerca che esplora la divisione del lavoro domestico e familiare nella coppia e nel filone degli studi etnografici della vita quotidiana delle famiglie. I risultati, basati su analisi di diari, interviste e di interazioni videoregistrate in famiglia, si focalizzano su: 1) le rappresentazioni da parte di madri e padri delle loro pratiche di gestione e coordinamento delle attivita familiari 2) la natura cognitiva del lavoro che tale attivita di gestione e coordinamento implica, 3) le rappresentazioni identitarie delle madri e dei padri.;

Keywords:Madri, padri, lavoro domestico, interazioni familiari, lavoro cognitivo, management familiare.

  1. Arcidiacono, F. (2007). L’osservazione dei rientri a casa: studio etnografico della vita quotidiana in famiglia. Rassegna di Psicologia, 14(2), 155-174. DOI: 10.7379/71591
  2. Frisco, M.L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, and Divorce in Dual-Earner Households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51-73. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02238520
  3. Frissen, V.A.J. (2000). ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life. The Information Society, 16(1), 65-75. DOI: 10.1080/019722400128338
  4. Ganong, L.H., & Coleman, M. (1999). Changing families, changing responsibilities: family obligations following divorce and remarriage. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  5. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. NJ, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
  6. Gasparini, G. (2000). La dimensione sociale del tempo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: work and leisure in post-industrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Gillis, J.R. (2001). Never enough time: some paradoxes of modern family time(s). In K. Daly (Ed.), Minding the time in family experience: emerging perspectives and issues (pp. 19-36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  9. Giorgi, S., & Pontecorvo, C. (Eds.) (2009). Culture familiari tra pratiche quotidiane e rappresentazioni. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2.
  10. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Anchor.
  11. Good, J.S. (2009). Multitasking and attention in interaction: Dealing with multiple tasks in everyday family life. UCLA (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3384038).
  12. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  13. Gottzen, L., & Good, J. (2010). The second half of the “second shift”: Swedish and US fathers’ domestic work responsibility upon return home. Working paper #97, The Center for Everyday Lives of Families, UCLA.
  14. Graesch, A.J., Ragazzini, E., & Ochs, E. (2012). Life at home in the 21st century: 32 families open their doors. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
  15. Gregson, N., & Lowe, M. (2008). Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review, 41(3), 475-505. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x
  16. Hessing, M. (2007). More than Clockwork: Women’s Time Management in Their Combined Workloads. Sociological Perspectives, 37(4), 611-633. DOI: 10.2307/1389281
  17. Hochschild, A.R., & Anne, M. (1989). The second shift. Working parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin.
  18. Istat (2010). La divisione dei ruoli nelle coppie. Research report. (Retrieved March 23rd 2012 on http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20101110_00/testointegrale20101110.pdf).
  19. Johnson, N. (2002). Gender and rhetorical space in American life, 1866-1910. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  20. Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2007). Working Relationships: Communicative Patterns and Strategies among Couples in Everyday Life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4(1-2), 29-47. DOI: 10.1080/14780880701473391
  21. Kluwer, E.S., Heesink, J.A.M., & De Vliert, E.V. (2007). The Marital Dynamics of Conflict over the Division of Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 635-653.
  22. Leslie, L.A., Anderson, E.A., & Branson, M.P. (1991). Responsibility for Children: The Role of Gender and Employment. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 197-210.
  23. Merderer, H. (1993). Division of Labor in Two-Earner Homes: Task Accomplishment versus Household Management as Critical Variables in Perceptions about Family Work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 133-45.
  24. Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: morality as family practice. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 5-10. DOI: 10.1177/0957926507069451
  25. Ochs, E., Shohet, M., Campos, B., & Beck, M. (2010). Coming together for dinner. In C. K & B. Schneider (Eds.), Workplace flexibility: Realigning 20th century jobs to 21st century workers (pp. 57-70). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  26. Padiglione, V., & Fatigante, M. (2009). Dalla documentazione al patrimonio. Il percorso di restituzione in un’etnografia domestica familiare. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 2, 205-224. DOI: 10.3240/29985
  27. Peterson, R.R., & Gerson, K. (2007). Determinants of Responsibility for Child Care Arrangements among Dual-Earner Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(3), 527-536. DOI: 10.2307/353239
  28. Pontecorvo, C. (2006). Introduzione. Età evolutiva, 85(Special issue “La vita quotidiana delle famiglie italiane di classe media”), 58-61.
  29. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
  30. Romano, M.C., & Sabbadini, L.L. (2005). I tempi della vita quotidiana. Famiglia Oggi, (8/9), 22-23.
  31. Ronka, A., Malinen, K., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Lamsa, T. (2010). Capturing daily family dynamics via text messages: development of the mobile diary. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 5-21. DOI: 10.1080/13668800902823581
  32. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
  33. Saraceno, C. (2003). La conciliazione di responsabilità familiari e attività lavorative in Italia: paradossi ed equilibri imperfetti. Polis, 2, 199-228. DOI: 10.1424/9563
  34. Fox, N. (1997). Reproducing difference: Changes in the lives of partners becoming parents. In M. Luxton (Ed.), Feminism and families: Critical policies and changing practices (pp. 142-162). Halifax: Fernwood.
  35. Eurostat (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Brussels.
  36. Elvin-Nowak, Y., & Thomsson, H. (2001). Motherhood as idea and practice: A Discursive Understanding of Employed Mothers in Sweden. Gender & Society, 15(3), 407-428. DOI: 10.1177/089124301015003005
  37. Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1995). «Workaholics» and “whingeing women”: theorising intimacy and emotion work: the last frontier of gender inequality? Sociological review, 43(1), 150-169. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb02482.x
  38. Doucet, A. (2004). “It’s Almost Like I Have a Job, but I Don’t Get Paid”: Fathers at Home Reconfiguring. Fathering, 2, 277-303. DOI: 10.3149/fth.0203.277
  39. Doucet, A. (2001). “You See the Need Perhaps More Clearly Than I Have”: Exploring Gendered Processes of Domestic Responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 22(3), 328-357. DOI: 10.1177/019251301022003004
  40. De Vault, M. (1991). Feeding the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  41. de Graaf, P.M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Divorce Motives in a Period of Rising Divorce: Evidence From a Dutch Life-History Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 27(4), 483-505. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X05283982
  42. Darrah, C.N. (2007). The Anthropology of Busyness. Human Organization, 66 (3), 261-269.
  43. Daly, K. (2002). Time, Gender, and the Negotiation of Family Schedules. Symbolic Interaction, 25(3), 323-342. 10.1525/si.2002.25.3.323. 200.
  44. Daly, K. (1996). Families and Time: Keeping Pace in a Hurried Culture. London: Sage.
  45. Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text & Talk, 30(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2010.001
  46. Campos, B., Graesch, A.P., Repetti, R., Bradbury, T., & Ochs, E. (2009). Opportunity for interaction? A naturalistic observation study of dual-earner families after work and school. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 798-807. DOI: 10.1037/a0015824
  47. Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33(1), 106-133. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3
  48. Boeri, T., Del Boca, D., & Pissarides, C. (2005). Women at work: an economic perspective. New York: Oxford Univ. press.
  49. Blair, S.L., & Lichter, D.T. (1991). Measuring the Division of Household Labor: Gender Segregation of Housework Among American Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 91-113. DOI: 10.1177/019251391012001007
  50. Bird, C.E. (1999) Gender, Household Labor, and Psychological Distress: The Impact of the Amount and Division of Housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(1), 32-45.
  51. Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P., & Milkie, M.A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.
  52. Balbo, L. (1987). Time to care. Politiche del tempo e diritti quotidiani. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  53. Aronsson, K. (2006). Doing family. An interactive accomplishment. Text & Talk, 26(4-5), 619-626. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.025
  54. Aronsson, K. (2004). Tattoos, visions and other autobiographical resources. On the narrative fabrics of self-making. Narrative Inquiry, 14(2), 421-429. DOI: 10.1075/ni.14.2.12aro
  55. Serrano, F., & Fasulo, A. (2011). L’intervista come conversazione. Roma: Carocci.
  56. Shelton, B.A. (1990). The Distribution of Household Tasks: Does Wife’s Employment Status Make a Difference? Journal of Family Issues, 11(2), 115-135. DOI: 10.1177/019251390011002001
  57. Tannen, D., & Goodwin, M.H. (Eds.) (2006). Family Discourse, Framing Family. Text (Special issue), 26(4).
  58. Thistle, S. (2006). From marriage to the market: the transformation of women’s lives and work. Berkeley and Los Angeles: California University Press.
  59. Thompson, L. (1991). Family Work: Women’s Sense of Fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 181-196. DOI: 10.1177/019251391012002003
  60. VanEvery, J. (1997). Understanding gendered inequality: Reconceptualizing housework. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 411-420. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00024-1
  61. Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research. Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111-125. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00080-0
  62. Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F., & Scozzafava, S. (2009). Attivita quotidiane delle famiglie e pratiche di coordinamento. In Gruppo di Studio sulle Disparità di Genere (a cura di), Le questioni sui generi in psicologia sociale: Atti del convegno “Differenze e disparità: le questioni sui generi in psicologia sociale”, Parma, 19-20 febbraio (pp.322-336). Parma: Uni.Nova.

  • The Caregiving Experiences of Fathers and Mothers of Children With Rare Diseases in Italy: Challenges and Social Support Perceptions Paola Cardinali, Laura Migliorini, Nadia Rania, in Frontiers in Psychology 1780/2019
    DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01780
  • Daily Family Routines of Italian and Ecuadorian Immigrant Mothers in Everyday Life Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora, Paola Cardinali, in Sage Open 2158244015609411/2015
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015609411
  • Parental Competence in Italy: A Comparison Between Italian and Immigrant Parents Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora, in Marriage & Family Review /2018 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2016.1247760
  • Family well‐being during the COVID‐19 lockdown in Italy: Gender differences and solidarity networks of care Nadia Rania, Ilaria Coppola, Francesca Lagomarsino, Rosa Parisi, in Child & Family Social Work /2022 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12867

Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio, Rappresentazioni discorsive dell’impegno domestico e familiare in madri e padri che lavorano in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2014, pp 9-34, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2014-001001