Journal title SOCIETÀ E STORIA
Author/s Gian Luca Fruci, Maurizio Isabella, Viviana Mellone
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/185
Language Italian Pages 26 P. 601-626 File size 159 KB
DOI 10.3280/SS2024-185007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The paper expresses appreciation for the historiographic value of analysing the case study of the petition campaign for the abrogation of the 1848 constitution in the Two Sicilies in the mid-nineteenth century, placing it in the framework of a broader investigation of the counter-revolution in the Bourbon Mezzogiorno and Ferdinand II’s power based on a new populist (if not plebeist) absolutism. At the same time, some critical considerations are developed concerning the interpretation of the elections of 1848 and the unification plebiscite of 1860 proposed by Marco Meriggi’s book with reference to the debate on the Risorgimento and the mass Anti- Risorgimento.
This intervention puts Marco Meriggi’s work in relationship with recent historiographical revisionism about the nature of the Italian Risorgimento and the popular dimension of European counterrevolutionary movements. It sets Neapolitan popular royalism in 1848 into the larger European context, by comparing it to similar phenomena appearing in France, Portugal and Spain during the same decades. Finally it draws attention on the flexibility and porosity of nineteenth-century political alignments.
The article focuses on a specific aspect of Ferdinand II’s absolute monarchy, as revealed in Marco Meriggi’s volume: as it developed, in the wake of popular support after the 1848 Revolution. On this perspective, the research avoids viewing the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies within the paradigm of negative exceptionalism and gives the author of the article the opportunity to compare the Neapolitan case with some other European monarchies of the first half of the 19th century, such as the French, British, Russian and Spanish ones. This comparison, interwoven with some of Ferdinand’s other policies that have been studied in recent research, allows us to understand why the king sought popular support: he aimed at building a modern and – at the same time reactionary Neapolitan nation capable of competing with modern liberal nations.
Keywords: Counterrevolution, mass politics, popular royalism, Naples, Spain, Portugal, France, Risorgimento, 1848, Mass Anti-Risorgimento, Mass Risorgimento, Petitions, Constitution, 1848 Elections, Unification plebiscites, monarchy, Nineteenth century post-revolutionary absolutism, Neapolitan Nation.
Gian Luca Fruci, Maurizio Isabella, Viviana Mellone, (Anti) Risorgimento di massa / Politica di massa e controrivoluzione. Alcune note comparative. Da Napoli all’Europa / La monarchia populista in "SOCIETÀ E STORIA " 185/2024, pp 601-626, DOI: 10.3280/SS2024-185007