John Locke and Catharine Cockburn on Personal Identity

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Emilio Maria De Tommaso, Giuliana Mocchi
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 205-220 Dimensione file 219 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2021-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

John Locke’s account of personal identity (Essay 2.27) is one of his most discussed theories. Opposing the Cartesian ontology of mind, Locke argued that the soul does not always think - for thinking is simply one of its operations, but not its essence -, and that personal identity consists in consciousness alone. Against Locke, an anonymous commentator published the Remarks upon an Essay concerning Humane Understanding (1697-99) charging Locke’s view with possible immorality. Catharine Cockburn rebuffed the Remarker’s objections, in her Defence of Mr. Locke's Essay (1702), depicting his view as more dangerous for morality than Locke’s. This paper shifts the focus from Cockburn’s defence of Locke’s moral thought, to her apology for his theory of personal identity, including his probabilistic arguments in favour of the immortality of the soul. This shift of focus yields an alternative account of Cockburn’s originality: first, because she offered a non-substance interpretation of Locke’s theory of personal identity, that, for its time, was unusual, and remains relevant for contemporary philosophical debates over Locke; and second, because, following Kristeller, in the very act of defending and articulating anew Locke’s theory, Cockburn in some sense appropriated it.

Keywords:Locke, Cockburn, Personal Identity, Immortality, Non-substance reading.

  1. - Atherthon 1983: Margaret Atherton, Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity, «Midwest Studies in Philosophy», 8 (1983), pp. 273-293.
  2. - Boeker 2014: Ruth Boeker, The Moral Dimension in Locke’s Account of Persons and Personal Identity, «History of Philosophy Quarterly», 31 (2014), 3, pp. 229-247.
  3. - Boeker 2017: Ruth Boeker, Locke on Personal Identity: A Response to the Problems of His Predecessors, «Journal of the History of Philosophy», 55 (2017), 3, pp. 407-434.
  4. - Bolton 1993: Martha Brandt Bolton, Some Aspects of the Philosophy of Catharine Trotter, «Journal of the History of Philosophy», 31 (1993), 4, pp. 565-88.
  5. - Bolton 2016: Martha Brandt Bolton, Locke on Thinking Matter, in Stuart 2016, pp. 334-353.
  6. - Burrows 2007: John Burrows, All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata, «Literary and Linguistic Computing», 27 (2007), pp. 27–47.
  7. - Chappell 1989: Vere Chappell, Locke and relative identity, «History of Philosophy Quarterly», 6 (1989), pp. 69–83.
  8. - Chappell 1989: Vere Chappell, Locke on the ontology of matter, living things, and persons, «Philosophical Studies», 60 (1990), pp. 19–32.
  9. - De Tommaso 2019: Emilio M. De Tommaso, La filosofia morale di Catharine Cockburn, in S. Plastina ed E.M. De Tommaso (eds.), Filosofe e scienziate in età moderna, Bruniana & Campanelliana, Supplementi, XLIII, Studi 18 (2019), pp. 109-121.
  10. - Downing 2016: Lisa Downing, Locke and Descartes, in Stuart 2016, pp. 100-120.
  11. - Giuntini 2015: Chiara Giuntini, Presenti a se stessi. La centralità della coscienza in Locke, a cura di B. Lotti e L. Mannarino, Firenze: Le Lettere, 2015.
  12. - Gordon-Roth 2015a: Jessica Gordon-Roth, Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Defence of Locke, «The Monist», 98 (2015), pp. 64-76.
  13. - Gordon-Roth 2015b: Jessica Gordon-Roth, Locke on the Ontology of Persons, «The Southern Journal of Philosophy», 53 (2015), 1, pp. 97-123.
  14. - Gordon-Roth 2019: Jessica Gordon-Roth, Locke on Personal Identity, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019, URL: -- https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/locke-personal-identity/.
  15. - Green 2018: Karen Green, On some footnotes to Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Defence of the Essay Of Human Understanding, «British Journal for the History of Philosophy», 2018,
  16. - Kelley 2002: Anne Kelley, Catharine Trotter. An Early Modern Writer in the Vanguard of Feminism, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.
  17. - Kristeller 1983, Paul O. Kristeller, “Creativity” and “Tradition”, «Journal of History of Ideas», 44 (1983), 1, pp. 105-113.
  18. - Kulstad 1984: Mark Kulstad, Locke on Consciousness and Reflection, «Studia Leibnitiana», 16 (1984), 2, pp. 143-167.
  19. - Law 1769: Edmund Law, Defence of Mr. Locke’s Opinion Concerning Personal Identity, Cambridge: Johnson, 1769.
  20. - LoLordo 2010: Antonia LoLordo, Person, Substance, Mode and “the moral Man” in Locke’s Philosophy, «Canadian Journal of Philosophy», 40 (2010), 4, pp. 643-667.
  21. - LoLordo 2012: Antonia LoLordo, Locke’s Moral Man, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  22. - Mattern 1980: Ruth Mattern, Moral Science and the Concept of Persons in Locke, «The Philosophical Review», 89 (1980), 1, pp. 24-45.
  23. - Nuovo 2011: Victor Nuovo, Christianity, Antiquity, and Enlightenment. Interpretations of John Locke, Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.
  24. - Porter 1887: Noah Porter, Marginalia Locke-a-na, «The New Englander and Yale Review», 11 (1887), 47, pp. 33-49.
  25. - Rickless 2015: Samuel C. Rickless, Are Locke’s Persons Modes or Substances?, in P. Lodge and T. Stoneham (eds.), Locke and Leibniz on Substance, New York-London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 110-127.
  26. - Sheridan 2007: Patricia Sheridan, Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The Extent of Catharine Cockburn’s Lockeanism in her Defence of Mr. Locke’s Essay, «Hypatia», 22 (2007), 3, pp. 133-151.
  27. - Strawson 2011: Galen Strawson, Locke on Personal Identity, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  28. - Stuart 2016: Matthew Stuart (ed.), A Companion to Locke, Malden-Oxford: Blackwell Publisher, 2016.
  29. - Thiel 2011: Udo Thiel, The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
  30. - Thomas 2015: Emily Thomas, Catharine Cockburn on Unthinking Immaterial Substance: Souls, Space, and Related Matters, «Philosophy Compass», 10 (2015), 4, pp. 255-263.
  31. - Uzgalis 1990: William Uzgalis, Relative Identity and Locke’s Principle of Individuation, «History of Philosophy Quarterly», 7 (1990), pp. 283–297.
  32. - Walmsley, Craig, and Burrows 2016: Johnathan C. Walmsley, Hugh Craig, and John Burrows, The Authorship of the Remarks upon an Essay of Humane Understanding, «Eighteenth-Century Thought», 6 (2016), pp. 205-243.
  33. - Wilson 1994: Fred Wilson, Substance and Self in Locke and Hume, in K.F. Barber and J.J.E. Gracia (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 155-199.
  34. - Wilson 1979: Margaret D. Wilson, Superadded Properties: The Limits of Mechanism in Locke, «American Philosophical Quarterly», 26 (1979), 2, pp. 143-150.
  35. - Winkler 1991: Kenneth Winkler, Locke on Personal Identity, «Journal of the History of Philosophy», 29 (1991), 2, pp. 201-226.

  • On personal identity and space: some remarks on Ruth Boeker’s Catharine Trotter Cockburn Emilio Maria De Tommaso, in British Journal for the History of Philosophy /2024 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2024.2304195

Emilio Maria De Tommaso, Giuliana Mocchi, John Locke and Catharine Cockburn on Personal Identity in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 2/2021, pp 205-220, DOI: 10.3280/SF2021-002001