Un training mentalistico ed uno non mentalistico a confronto: valutazione di teoria della mente, cooperazione e prosocialità in età scolare

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Marcella Caputi, Dario Maglione, Carolina Decio, Ileana Locarini, Martina Meroni, Eleonora Rosi, Federica Cugnata, Chiara Brombin
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 22 P. 461-482 Dimensione file 219 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2019-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Nel presente lavoro, condotto su bambini di 9-10 anni, ci si è proposti di valutare gli effetti di due training - uno mentalistico e uno non mentalistico - sulla teoria della mente, sulla cooperazione e sulla prosocialità. I due training sono stati messi a confronto, randomizzando il campione in due gruppi composti ciascuno da 105 bambini. La teoria della mente è migliorata maggiormente nel gruppo assegnato alla condizione di training mentalistico, i livelli di cooperazione e prosocialità sono aumentati in entrambi i gruppi e la teoria della mente è risultata un predittore significativo della cooperazione ma non della prosocialità.;

Keywords:Teoria della mente, training, media infanzia, cooperazione, comportamento prosociale

  1. Appleton, M., & Reddy, V. (1996). Teaching three year-olds to pass false belief tests: A conversational approach. Social Development, 5, 275-291.
  2. Banerjee, R., & Watling, D. (2005). Children’s understanding of faux pas. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 2, 27-45.
  3. Banerjee, R., Watling, D., & Caputi, M. (2011). Peer relations and the understanding of faux pas: Longitudinal evidence for bidirectional associations. Child Development , 82(6), 1887-1905.
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34, 174-183.
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: a study with normal adults and adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 214-251. DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
  6. Bak, P. L. (2013). “Thoughts in mind”: Promoting mentalizing communities for children. In Minding the Child (pp. 216-232). Routledge.
  7. Bianco, F., & Lecce, S. (2016). Translating child development research into practice: Can teachers foster children's theory of mind in primary school? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 592-605.
  8. Bianco, F., Lecce, S., & Banerjee, R. (2016). Conversations about mental states and theory of mind development during middle childhood: A training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149, 41-61.
  9. Bianco, F., Nola, M., Devine, R. T., & Lecce, S. (2015). Promoting theory of mind in school-aged children: Direct and transfer effects. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 19(2), 249-270. DOI: 10.1449/80314
  10. Blijd-Hoogewys, E. M., van Geert, P. L., Serra, M., & Minderaa, R. B. (2008). Measuring theory of mind in children. Psychometric properties of the ToM
  11. Storybooks. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1907-1930.
  12. Bosacki, S., & Astington, J. W. (1999). Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Development, 8, 237-255. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9507.00093
  13. Camaioni, L. (2003). La teoria della mente: Origini, sviluppo e patologia. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  14. Caputi, M., Lecce, S., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2012). Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: The role of prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 257-270.
  15. Caputi, M., Pantaleo, G., & Scaini, S. (2017). Do feelings of loneliness mediate the relationship between sociocognitive understanding and depressive symptoms during late childhood and early adolescence?. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(4), 207-216. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2017.1317629
  16. Charman, T., Baron-Cohen, S., Swettenham, J., Baird, G., Cox, A., & Drew, A. (2000). Testing joint attention, imitation, and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 15(4), 481-498. DOI: 10.1016/S0885-2014(01)00037-5
  17. Clements, W. A., Rustin, C. L., & McCallum, S. (2000). Promoting the transition from implicit to explicit understanding: A training study of false belief. Developmental Science, 3(1), 81-92. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00102
  18. Coburn, P. I., Bernstein, D. M., & Begeer, S. (2015). A new paper and pencil task reveals adult false belief reasoning bias. Psychological Research, 79, 739-749.
  19. Currie, C., Molcho, M., Boyce, W., Holstein, B., Torsheim, T., & Richter, M. (2008). Re searching health inequalities in adolescents: The development of the health behavior in school-aged children (HBSC) family affluence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 66(6), 1429-1436.
  20. Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2013). Silent Films and Strange Stories: Theory of mind, gender, and social experiences in middle childhood. Child Development, 84(3), 989-1003.
  21. Devine, R. T., & Hughes, C. (2016). Measuring theory of mind across middle childhood: Reliability and validity of the Silent Films and Strange Stories tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 149(5), 23-40.
  22. Devine, R. T., White, N., Ensor, R., & Hughes, C. (2016). Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 758-764.
  23. Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539.
  24. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality & Individual Differences, 50, 603-608.
  25. Goldstein, T. R., & Winner, E. (2012). Enhancing empathy and theory of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(1), 19-37. DOI: 10.1080/15248372.2011.573514
  26. Hale, C. M., & Tager- Flusberg, H. (2003). The influence of language on theory of mind: A training study. Developmental Science, 6(3), 346-359. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00289
  27. Henry, J. D., Cowan, D. G., Lee, T., & Sachdev, P. S. (2015). Recent trends in testing social cognition. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 28(2), 133-140. DOI: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000139
  28. Hofmann, S. G., Doan, S. N., Sprung, M., Wilson, A., Ebesutani, C., Andrews, L. A., . . . & Harris, P. L. (2016). Training children’s theory-of-mind: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Cognition, 150, 200-212.
  29. Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2011). Implications of affective and social neuroscience for educational theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 98-103.
  30. Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: a meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192–1205.
  31. Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (2000). Theory of mind and social behavior: Causal models tested in a longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46(2), 203-220.
  32. Kanske, P. (2018). The social mind: disentangling affective and cognitive routes to understanding others. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43, 115-124.
  33. 10.1080/03080188.2018.1453243. Kloo, D., & Perner, J. (2008). Training theory of mind and executive control: A tool for improving school achievement? Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 122-127.
  34. Kuhnert, R., Begeer, S., Fink, E., & de Rosnay, M. (2017). Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 13.27.
  35. Lecce, S., Bianco, F., Devine, R. T., Hughes, C., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Promoting theory of mind during middle childhood: A training program. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 52-67.
  36. Lecce, S., Caputi, M., Pagnin, A., & Banerjee, R. (2017). Theory of mind and school achievement: The mediating role of social competence. Cognitive Development, 44, 85-97.
  37. Lecce, S., Caputi, M., Pagnin, A., De Rosnay, M., & Pons, F. (2010). La competenza sociale secondo genitori e insegnanti: Il ruolo della teoria della mente. Età Evolutiva, 96, 5-14.
  38. Leslie, A. M., & Happé, F. (1989). Autism and ostensive communication: The relevance of metarepresentation. Development and Psychopathology, 1(3), 205-212. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579400000407
  39. Lohmann, H., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of language in the development of false belief understanding: A training study. Child Development, 74(4), 1130-1144. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00597
  40. Lonigro, A., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., & Baumgartner, E. (2014). Mind reading skills and empathy: Evidence for nice and nasty ToM behaviours in school-aged children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 581-590.
  41. Michelson, L., Sugai, D. P., Wood, R. P., & Kazdin, A. E. (2013). Social skills assessment and training with children: An empirically based handbook. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
  42. Miller, S. A. (2013). Children’s Understanding of Second-Order False Belief: Comparisons of Content and Method of Assessment. Infant and Child Development, 22, 649-658.
  43. Meins, E. (1999). Sicurezza e sviluppo sociale della conoscenza. Nuove prospettive per la teoria dell’attaccamento. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  44. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Das Gupta, M., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal mind-mindedness and attachment security as predictors of theory of mind understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715-1726.
  45. Melot, A., & Angeard, N. (2003). Theory of mind: Is training contagious? Developmental Science, 6(2), 178-184. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00269
  46. Muris, P., Steerneman, P., Meesters, C., Merckelbach, H., Horselenberg, R., van den Hogen, T., & van Dongen, L. (1999). The TOM test: A new instrument for assessing theory of mind in normal children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(1), 67-80.
  47. Peskin, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 253-273.
  48. Peterson, C. C., Wellman, H. M., & Slaughter, V. (2012). The Mind Behind the Message: Advancing Theory-of-Mind Scales for Typically Developing Children, and Those with Deafness, Autism, or Asperger Syndrome. Child Development, 83, 469-485.
  49. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). Springer, Boston, MA.
  50. Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher-child relationships and children's success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 444-458.
  51. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Linear Mixed-Effects Models: Basic Concepts and Examples. In J.C. Pinheiro & D.M. Bates (Eds.), Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. Statistics and Computing (pp. 3-56). New York, NY: Springer.
  52. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind”? Be havioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515-526. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
  53. Ronald, A., Happé, F., Hughes, C., & Plomin, R. (2005). Nice and nasty theory of mind in preschool children: Nature and nurture. Social Development, 14, 664-684.
  54. Siegal, M. (1999). Language and thought: The fundamental significance of conversational awareness for cognitive development. Developmental Science, 2, 1-14. DOI: 10.1111/1467-7687.00048
  55. Slaughter, V., & Gopnik, A. (1996). Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind: Training children to understand belief. Child Development, 67(6), 2967-2988.
  56. Sodian, B. (2011). Theory of Mind in Infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 39-43.
  57. Sodian, B., & Thoermer, C. (2008). Precursors to a theory of mind in infancy: Perspectives for research on autism. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 27-39. DOI: 10.1080/17470210701508681
  58. Valle, A., Massaro, D., Castelli, I., Sangiuliano Intra, F., Lombardi, E., Bracaglia, E., & Marchetti, A. (2016). Promoting Mentalizing in Pupils by Acting on Teachers: Preliminary Italian Evidence of the “Thought in Mind” Project. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1213.
  59. Weimer, A. A., Dowds, S. J. P., Fabricius, W. V., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Suh, G. W. (2017). Development of constructivist theory of mind from middle childhood to early adulthood and its relation to social cognition and behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 28-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.002.
  60. Wellman, H. M. (2018). Theory of mind: The state of the art. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. DOI: 10.1080/17405629.2018.1435413
  61. Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory- of- mind tasks. Child Development, 75(2), 523-541.
  62. White, S., Hill, E., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2009). Revisiting the Strange Stories: Revealing mentalising impairments in autism. Child Development, 80, 1097-1117.
  63. Yu, J., Zhu, L., & Leslie, A. M. (2016). Children’s sharing behavior in mini-dictator games: The role of in-group favoritism and theory-of-mind. Child Development, 87(6), 1747-1757.

Marcella Caputi, Dario Maglione, Carolina Decio, Ileana Locarini, Martina Meroni, Eleonora Rosi, Federica Cugnata, Chiara Brombin, Un training mentalistico ed uno non mentalistico a confronto: valutazione di teoria della mente, cooperazione e prosocialità in età scolare in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 3/2019, pp 461-482, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2019-003002