The effects of expo Milano 2015 on consumer food choices

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE
Autori/Curatori Elena Claire Ricci, Alessandro Banterle
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 12 P. 233-244 Dimensione file 113 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2018-002008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The role of individual behaviour for tackling environmental issues is increasingly becoming more topical. Therefore, consumer attitudes and behavior related to environmentally friendly practices need to be investigated further. This paper evaluates the effect of expo Milano 2015 on consumer awareness of the impacts of their day-to-day food choices and on their food behaviour. Data were collected via in person interviews in Milan (Italy) and analysed via ordinal regression models. Results suggest that international events with strong media coverage may be useful for engaging the segments of population that are not already aware and proactive on the matter.

Keywords:Consumer choices, food, expo, sustainability, behavioural change

Jel codes:D12, Q01, Q18, Q56

  1. Arvola, A., Vassallo, M., Dean, M., Lampila, P., Saba, A., Lähteenmäki, L., & Shepherd, R. (2008). Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite, 50(2-3), 443-454.
  2. Banterle, A., Ricci, E.C., & Cavaliere, A. (2018). Environmental sustainability and the food system. In: Bremmers, H.J., Purnhagen, K. (Eds.), Regulating Food Safety Law in the EU – A Management and Economics Perspective. Berlino: Springer.
  3. Blasi, G.D., Acciani, C., Boni, A.D., & Roma, R. (2006). Comportamento dei consumatori nell’acquisto di prodotti ittici. Innovazioni biotech e percorsi di scelta. Economia agro-alimentare, 10(2), 7-29.
  4. Caracciolo, F., Cicia, G., Del Giudice, T., Cembalo, L., Krystallis, A., Grunert, K.G., & Lombardi, P. (2016). Human values and preferences for cleaner livestock production. Journal of cleaner production, 112, Part 1, 121-130.
  5. Cavaliere, A., Ricci, E., Solesin, M., & Banterle, A., 2014. Can Health and Environmental Concerns Meet in Food Choices? Sustainability, 6, 9494-9509.
  6. Del Giudice, T., Stranieri, S., Caracciolo di Torchiarolo, F., Ricci, E.C., Cembalo, L., Banterle, A., & Cicia, G. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility certifications influence consumer preferences and the seafood market price. Journal of cleaner production, 178(1), 526-533.
  7. Dietz, T., Gardner, G.T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P.C., & Vandenbergh, M.P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(44), 18452-18456.
  8. Dixon, C.J., & Leach, B. (1977). Sampling methods for geographical research. Norwich: Geo Abstracts Ltd.
  9. Fiore, M., Pellegrini, G., La Sala, P., Conte, A., & Liu, B. (2017). Attitude toward food waste reduction: the case of Italian consumers. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 9(2-3), 185-189. DOI: 10.1504/IJGSB.2017.088921
  10. Gardner, G.T., & Stern, P.C. (2008). The Short List: The Most Effective Actions U.S. Households Can Take to Curb Climate Change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50(2), 12-25. DOI: 10.3200/ENVT.50.5.12-25
  11. Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., & Veeman, M.M. (2016). Paying for sustainability: A cross-cultural analysis of consumers’ valuations of food and non-food products labeled for carbon and water footprints. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 63(3), 50-58.
  12. Grunert, K.G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44(1), 177-189.
  13. Hemmerling, S., Canavari, M., & Spiller, A. (2016). Preference for naturalness of European organic consumers: First evidence of an attitude-liking gap. British Food Journal, 118, 2287-2307.
  14. Hox, J.J., Moerbeek, M., & Schoot, R. van de. (2010). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, Second Edition. London: Routledge.
  15. IPCC 2014. Climate Change (2014): Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in Edenhofer et al. (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York (usa).
  16. Mancuso, T., Baldi, L., & Gasco, L. (2016). An empirical study on consumer acceptance of farmed fish fed on insect meals: the Italian case. Aquaculture International, 24(5), 1489-1507.
  17. Menozzi, D., & Mora, C. (2012). Fruit consumption determinants among young adults in Italy: A case study. LWT-Food Science and technology, 49(2), 298-304.
  18. Moser, R., & Raffaelli, R. (2012). Consumer preferences for sustainable production methods in apple purchasing behaviour: a non-hypothetical choice experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36, 141-148.
  19. Nocella, G., Boecker, A., Hubbard, L., & Scarpa, R. (2012). Eliciting Consumer Preferences for Certified Animal-Friendly Foods: Can Elements of the Theory of Planned Behavior Improve Choice Experiment Analysis? Psychology & Marketing, 29(11), 850-868.
  20. Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010). Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 365(1554), 3065-3081.
  21. Pavelka, J. (2014). The Factors Affecting the Presentation of Events and the Media Coverage of Topics in the Mass Media. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2nd World Conference on Psychology and Sociology, psysoc 2013, 27-29 November 2013, Brussels, Belgium 140, 623-629.
  22. Pomarici, E., Asioli, D., Vecchio, R., & Næs, T. (2018). Young consumers’ preferences for water-saving wines: An experimental study. Wine Economics Policy, 7(1), 65-76.
  23. Pongiglione, F., & Cherlet, J. (2015). The Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Climate Change: Fundamental but Disregarded? Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 46(2), 383-391.
  24. Ricci, E.C., Banterle, A., & Stranieri, S. (2018). Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience. Ecological economics, 148(2), 54-65.
  25. Sogari, G., Corbo, C., Macconi, M., Menozzi, D., & Mora, C. (2015). Consumer attitude towards sustainable-labelled wine: an exploratory approach. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 27(4), 312-328. DOI: 10.1108/IJWBR-12-2014-0053
  26. Stancu, V., Haugaard, P., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2016). Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite, 96(1), 7-17.
  27. Stranieri, S., Ricci, E.C., & Banterle, A. (2017). Convenience food with environmentally-sustainable attributes: A consumer perspective. Appetite, 116(9), 11-20.
  28. Sunstein, C.R. (2013). Behavioral Economics, Consumption, and Environmental Protection. SSRN Electroinc Journal.
  29. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1985). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. In: Covello, V.T., Mumpower, J.L., Stallen, P.J.M., & Uppuluri, V.R.R. (Eds.), Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis (pp. 107-129). Berlin: Springer.
  30. Van Loo, E.J., Caputo, V., Nayga, R.M., Seo, H.-S., Zhang, B., & Verbeke, W. (2015). Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecological economics, 118(10), 215-225.
  31. Vecchio, R., & Annunziata, A. (2015). Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: an experimental auction approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86(1), 335-342.
  32. Ventura, V., Iacus, S., Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Frisio, D. (2016). Expo Milano 2015: Legacies in Tweets. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 398-405.
  33. Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194.
  34. Verneau, F., La Barbera, F., Kolle, S., Amato, M., Del Giudice, T., & Grunert, K. (2016). The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: An experiment in Denmark and Italy. Appetite, Special Issue: Consumer behaviour in a changing world - Selected papers from the aaea/eaae joint seminar in Naples, March 25-27, 2015 106, 30-36.

  • Possibilities to improve the image of food and organic products on the AP Vojvodina market by introducing a regional quality label Jelena Končar, Aleksandar Grubor, Radenko Marić, Goran Vukmirović, Nenad Đokić, in Food and Feed Research /2019 pp.111
    DOI: 10.5937/FFR1901111K
  • Word Food Day on Twitter 2009-2020: Driven by UNFAO and Aligned Campaigns Michael Thelwall, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2021
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3807861
  • Food Loss and Waste, a global responsibility?! Nino Adamashvili, Filomena Chiara, Mariantonietta Fiore, in ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 3/2020 pp.825
    DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2019-003014

Elena Claire Ricci, Alessandro Banterle, The effects of expo Milano 2015 on consumer food choices in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2018, pp 233-244, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2018-002008