An interconnected path for social-ecological systems

Alessandra Colocci

An interconnected path for social-ecological systems

Decoding human-nature interactions to foster a resilient and sustainable development

In an era of environmental changes, where risks are becoming ever so grave for humans and non-humans across the planet, how to devise a development path that minimizes the threats? This research tries to address this question, building on the fundamental tenet that humans and nature are inextricably interconnected, and such an interdependence shapes their shared future. It is time to close the gap between resilience and sustainability when devising a common development path.

Pages: 266

ISBN: 9788835167440

Edizione:1a edizione 2024

Publisher code: 11111.16

Info about Open Access books

In an era of environmental changes, where risks are becoming ever so grave for humans and non-humans across the planet, how to devise a development path that minimizes the threats, looking out for a brighter future?
This research tries to address this question, building on the fundamental tenet that humans and nature are inextricably interconnected, and such an interdependence shapes their shared future. Furthermore, it is time to close the gap between resilience and sustainability when devising a common development path.
To this end, it is necessary a tool to investigate complex social-ecological systems and the inherent, complex interactions. Here, the panarchy theory was revised under the geographical lenses of disaster risk reduction, and social-ecological interactions were decoded to identify a categorisation of desirable conditions for a sound, integrated development. This also allowed to design a novel Combined Assessment of Resilience and Sustainability (CAReS) at the municipal scale, that focusing on flood risk was adapted to two case studies, Marche Region (Italy) and Hokkaido - (Japan). The analysis quantitatively investigated the levels of resilience and sustainability of the municipalities, and then explored the thoughts of local communities on local risks.
Results evidenced the role of flood events in determining the resilience capacities of local communities, and of anthropic impacts in defining their sustainability. At the same time, social welfare and protection appeared pivotal in building local resilience, while the presence of vegetation shaped sustainability. Besides, a substantial mismatch emerged between assessed and perceived conditions of resilience and sustainability, generally in negative terms.
Eventually, this approach is intended to inform risk reduction strategies and local governance, to foster a continuous effort of adjustment and renovation of local communities towards a common, interconnected future.

Alessandra Colocci is a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Brescia, where she teaches the course "Cartography and GIS" and laboratory of "Sustainability Certifications". Her main research interests include the governance of local adaptation to climate change and integrated approaches to sustainable development. Among the latest published works is "The role of sustainable energy and climate action plans: Synergies with regional sustainable development strategies for a local 2030 agenda" (Colocci, Gioia, Casareale, Marchetti, Marincioni, 2023).

Antonella Pietta, Foreword
Preface
Introduction
(The panarchy model; Adaptive cycle; Interactions; Critical issues; Panarchies of complex systems)
Part I. Theoretical framework
A Social-Ecological Panarchy
(Phases and interactions within a Social-Ecological Panarchy; Implications for disaster risk management; Reframing the cores of long-term development)
Assumptions, objective, hypothesis and research questions
Part II. Quantitative assessment
Literature review: resilience and sustainability assessments
(Rationale for objective indicators; Assessment of resilience; Assessment of sustainability; Viable indicators for a quantitative assessment)
Quantitative methodology
(A Combined Assessment of Resilience and Sustainability (CAReS))
The case studies
(The risk scenario; Marche region; Hokkaido Prefecture; Marche vs. Hokkaido; Tailoring the proposed methodology to the case studies)
Results
(Marche region; Hokkaido)
Discussion
(Marche region; Hokkaido)
Partial conclusions
Part III. Qualitative assessment
Literature review
Further assumptions, objective, hypotheses and questions
Qualitative methodology
(An enhanced Combined Assessment of Resilience and Sustainability (CAReS+))
The further case study
Results
(Introduction of the local responses; Analysis of the Municipal response; Analysis of the individual response)
Discussion
(General perception of the resilience and sustainability level; Individual perception of the resilience and sustainability level; Emerging traits of the local communities)
Partial conclusions
Conclusion
(A general overview; An overview on the theoretical outcomes; An overview on the quantitative outcomes; An overview on the qualitative outcomes; An overview on general trends; An overview beyond)
References.

You could also be interested in