Università eque e inclusive? Le politiche di genere negli atenei pubblici italiani

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Giovanna Gianturco, Giovanni Brancato, Mariella Nocenzi
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/136
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 24 P. 9-32 Dimensione file 317 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2025-136002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Since 2022, the European Commission has required universities to submit a Gender Equality Plan (GEP) to access Horizon Europe funding. More than a compliance tool, the GEP serves as a driver of cultural change, reflecting institutional priorities and shifts in public and policy debate on gender equality. This paper analyses the first two rounds of GEPs from Italian public universities using lexicometric content analysis to assess and compare approaches.

  1. A. Anand, J. Brix (2022), «The learning organization and organizational learning in the public sector: a review and research agenda», The Learning Organization, 29, 2, pp. 129-56.
  2. Anvur – Agenzia nazionale di valutazione del sistema universitario e della ricerca (2024), Analisi di genere. I focus del Rapporto Anvur 2023, Roma, Str Press, https://www.anvur.it/sites/ default/files/2024­12/Focus­equilibrio­di­genere­2023.pdf.
  3. Y.W.M. Benschop, M.M.T. Verloo (2011), Gender Change, Organizational Change, and Gender Equality Strategies, in E. L. Jeanes, D. Knights, P. Yancey Martin (eds.), Handbook of Gender, Work & Organization, Chicester, Wiley.
  4. S. Bolasco (1999), Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Metodi, strategie e criteri d’interpretazione, Roma, Carocci.
  5. S. Bolasco (2005), «Statistica testuale e text mining: alcuni paradigmi applicativi», Quaderni di statistica, 5, pp. 1-38.
  6. S. Bolasco (2013), L’analisi automatica dei testi. Fare ricerca con il text mining, Roma, Carocci.
  7. G. Brancato, G. Gianturco, M. Nocenzi (2025), «Toward a more inclusive academia? Strategies and perspectives through reading Italian universities’ Gender Equality Plans», Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 1, pp. 201-24.
  8. K. Crenshaw (1989), «Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics», University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, pp. 139-167.
  9. M. Cros (1993), Les apports de la linguistique: langage des jeunes et sida, in Anrs – Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le Sida, Les jeunes face au Sida: de la recherche à l’action, Paris, Anrs, pp. 50-61.
  10. P. Debusscher, E.L. Maes (2025), «The European Union­intersectionality framework: unpacking intersectionality in the “union of equality” agenda», Political Studies Review, 23, 1, pp. 276-96. European Commission (2020), Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0152. Committee and The Committee of The Regions A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025, eur-lex.europa.eu/
  11. European Commission (2022), Approaches to inclusive gender equality in research and innovation (R&I), Bruxelles, Publications Office of the European Union.
  12. European Commission (2023), Covid-19 impact on gender equality in research & innovation – Policy report, Bruxelles, Publications Office of the European Union.
  13. Eige – European Institute for Gender Equality (2025), Gender Equality in Academia and Research – Gear tool, https://eige.europa.eu/gender­mainstreaming/toolkits/gear/gep­development-and-implementation.
  14. A. Fasanella, S. Mauceri, S. Nobile (a c. di) (2024), Metodologia della ricerca sociale. Approcci, strategie e tecniche di indagine, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  15. Fondazione Crui (2021), Vademecum per l’elaborazione del Gender Equality Plan negli atenei italiani, Roma, Fondazione Crui, https://www.crui.it/documenti/54/New-category/854/Va- demecumGEP_Crui.pdf.
  16. A. Giddens (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  17. L. Giuliano, G. La Rocca (2008), L’analisi automatica e semi-automatica dei dati testuali. Software e istruzioni per l’uso, Roma, Led.
  18. D. Haraway (1988), «Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective», Feminist Studies, 14, 3, pp. 575-99.
  19. P. Hill Collins (2022), Intersezionalità come teoria critica sociale, Torino, Utet.
  20. F. Lancia (2004), Strumenti per l’analisi dei testi, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  21. M. Lopes, C. Santos, V. Ferreira, R. Monteiro, C. C. Vieira (2024), «The Transformative Potential of Gender Equality Plans to Expand Women’s, Gender, and Feminist Studies in Higher Education: Grounds for Vigilant Optimism», Education Sciences, 14, 889.
  22. J. Lorber (2021), The new gender paradox: Fragmentation and persistence of the binary, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  23. M. McCarry, C. Jones (2022), «The equality paradox: sexual harassment and gender inequality in a UK university», Journal of Gender Studies, 31, 8, pp. 928-40.
  24. L. Mergaert, E. Lombardo (2014), Resistance to Implementing Gender Mainstreaming in EU Research Policy, in E. Weiner, E. MacRae (eds.), The persistent invisibility of gender in EU policy’ European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 18, 5, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2523414.
  25. J. Mezirow (1997), «Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice», New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, pp. 5-12.
  26. M.W. Nielsen (2015), New and Persistent Gender Equality Challenges in Academia, PhD Dissertation, Aarhus Universitet, https://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/Afhandlinger/mathias_wullum_nielsen.pdf.
  27. P. Ratinaud (2009), Iramuteq: Interface de R pour les Analyses Multidimensionnelles de Textes et de Questionnaires, http://www.iramuteq.org.
  28. P. Ratinaud, P. Marchand (2012), Application de la méthode Alceste à de «gros» corpus et stabilité des «mondes lexicaux»: analyse du «CableGate» avec IraMuTeQ, in Actes des 11eme Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles, Liège, Université de Liège, pp. 835-44.
  29. M. Reinert (1990), «Alceste une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurelia De Gerard De Nerval», Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de méthodologie sociologique, 26, 1, pp. 24-54.
  30. R. Rosa, S. Clavero (2022), «Gender equality in higher education and research», Journal of Gender Studies, 31, 1, pp. 1-7.
  31. R. Tildesley, E. Lombardo, T. Verge (2022), «Power struggles in the implementation of gender equality policies: the politics of resistance and counter-resistance in universities», Politics & Gender, 18, 4, pp. 879-910.

Giovanna Gianturco, Giovanni Brancato, Mariella Nocenzi, Università eque e inclusive? Le politiche di genere negli atenei pubblici italiani in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 136/2025, pp 9-32, DOI: 10.3280/SR2025-136002