L’impatto delle caratteristiche del Consiglio di Amministrazione sulla disclosure del beneficio comune: un’analisi empirica nelle aziende benefit

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Arcangelo Marrone, Lara Oliva, Vincenzo Pontrelli, Angela Rella
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 39-63 Dimensione file 268 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

;

Keywords:Corporate Social Disclosure, Italian Benefit Companies, Impact Re-port, Board Characteristics

  1. Hidalgo, R.L., García-Meca, E., Martínez, I. (2011), Corporate governance and intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of business ethics, 100, pp. 483-495.
  2. Adams, R.B., Almeida, H., Ferreira, D. (2005), Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(4), pp. 1403-1432.
  3. Aerts, W., Cormier, D. (2009), Media legitimacy and corporate environmental communication. Accounting, organizations and society, 34(1), 1-27.
  4. Ahmed Haji, A., Anifowose, M. (2016), The trend of integrated reporting practice in South Africa: ceremonial or substantive?, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), pp. 190-224. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-11-2015-0106
  5. Alfiero, S., Cane, M., Doronzo, R., Esposito, A. (2018), The effect of national cultural differences of board members on integrated reporting. Corporate Board, 14(1), pp. 7-21.
  6. Ali, W., Wilson, J., Husnain, M. (2022), Determinants/motivations of corporate social responsibility disclosure in developing economies: A survey of the extant literature. Sustainability, 14(6), 3474.
  7. Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of accounting and economics, 37(3), pp. 315-342.
  8. Angelici, C. (2017), The Benefit Company. Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale, 1.
  9. Bagnoli, L., Chimirri, C., Nitti, C., Bellucci, M. (2019), Rendicontare l'impatto sociale: metodologie, indicatori e tre casi di sperimentazione in Toscana, Management Control, 3, 2019, pp. 166-187. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-003009
  10. Bandini, F., Fia, M., Boni, L., Toschi, L. (2020), Le Società Benefit in Italia. Scelte motivazionali e assetti di governance: una prima analisi empirica, Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 21-33, Egea.
  11. Bear, S., Rahman, N., Post, C. (2010), The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation, Journal of business ethics, 97, pp. 207-221.
  12. Bellavite Pellegrini, C., Seracini M. (2020), Profili di governance nelle Società Benefit. In Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 70-83. Egea.
  13. Bellavite Pellegrini, C., Cannas, C., Maurizio, D. (2020a), Costo del capitale e valutazione d’impatto per le Società Benefit, Società Benefit: Profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 45-57. Egea spa.
  14. Bellavite Pellegrini, C., Caruso, R., Di Domizio, M. (2020b), Le Società Benefit: un’analisi quantitativa, Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 7-20, Egea.
  15. Betz, M., O'Connell, L., Shepard, J.M. (1989), Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of business ethics, 8, pp. 321-324. DOI: 10.1007/BF00381722
  16. Bilimoria, D., Piderit, S.K. (1994), Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of management journal, 37(6), pp. 1453-1477. DOI: 10.5465/256795
  17. Black, R.C., Owens, R.J. (2011), Solicitor General influence and agenda setting on the US Supreme Court. Political Research Quarterly, 64(4), pp. 765-778. DOI: 10.1177/106591291038818
  18. Brennan, N. M., Solomon, J. (2008), Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: an overview, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885-906. DOI: 10.1108/09513570810907401
  19. Bueno, G., Marcon, R., Pruner-da-Silva, A.L., Ribeirete, F. (2018), The role of the board in voluntary disclosure, Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 18(5), pp. 809-838. DOI: 10.1108/CG-09-2017-0205
  20. Buss, D.M. (Ed.). (2005), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9780470939376
  21. Calabrò Antonio (2020). Economia sostenibile: per il cambio di paradigma tenere insieme nell’impresa l’etica e il profitto. In Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, 139-148. Egea.
  22. Cantele, S., Leardini, C., & Piubello Orsini, L. (2023). Impactful B Corps: A configurational approach of organizational factors leading to high sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
  23. Cantele, S., Troisi, G., Campedelli, B. (2021), Le società Benefit in Italia: un’analisi sulla diffusione e sulle prassi di rendicontazione, Management Control, 2. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2021-002006
  24. Certo, S.T. (2003), Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of management review, 28(3), pp. 432-446.
  25. Chouaibi, S., Chouaibi, Y., Zouari, G. (2022), Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: evidence from ESG European companies, EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), pp. 425-447. DOI: 10.1108/EMJB-11-2020-012
  26. Coda, V. (2020), Lo scopo dell’impresa. Impresa progetto, (3), pp. 1-26.
  27. Connelly, B.L., Certo, S.T., Ireland, R.D., Reutzel, C.R. (2011), Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), pp. 39-67. DOI: 10.1177/014920631038841
  28. Cooper, L.A., Weber, J. (2021), Does benefit corporation status matter to investors? An exploratory study of investor perceptions and decisions. Business & Society, 60(4), pp. 979-1008. DOI: 10.1177/000765031989846
  29. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), pp. 1636-1663. DOI: 10.1177/0149206311411506
  30. Dentoni-Litta Annalisa (2020), Aspetti normativi essenziali delle Società Benefit. In Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 33-43. Egea.
  31. Euromoney (2021). The Importance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Disclosure in the Banking Sector.
  32. Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C. (1983), Separation of ownership and control, The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), pp. 301-325
  33. Fasan, M., Mio, C. (2017), Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in integrated reporting, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), pp. 288-305.
  34. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 116(3), 429. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.42
  35. Ferioli, M., Gazzola, P., Grechi, D., & Vătămănescu, E. M. (2022). Sustainable behaviour of B Corps fashion companies during Covid-19: A quantitative economic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 374, 134010.
  36. Frias‐Aceituno, J.V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., Garcia‐Sanchez, I.M. (2013), The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting, Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 20(4), pp. 219-233.
  37. Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Manuel Prado‐Lorenzo, J., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A resource‐based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709-1727. DOI: 10.1108/0025174111118384
  38. Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Rodríguez‐Domínguez, L., García‐Sánchez, I.M. (2011), Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: content and explanatory factors. Online information review, 35(3), 360-385. DOI: 10.1108/14684521111151423
  39. Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011), Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany, Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3), pp. 233-262.
  40. Gandía, J.L. (2008), Determinants of internet‐based corporate governance disclosure by Spanish listed companies. Online information review, 32(6), pp. 791-817. DOI: 10.1108/14684520810923944
  41. García Sánchez, I.M., Rodriguez Dominguez, L., Gallego Alvarez, I. (2011), Corporate governance and strategic information on the internet: A study of Spanish listed companies, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(4), pp. 471-501. DOI: 10.1108/09513571111133063
  42. Gerli, F., Bengo, I., Calderini, M., Randazzo, R. (2020), La sfida della valutazione di impatto nelle Società Benefit italiane, Società Benefit, profili giuridici ed economico-aziendali, pp. 58-69, Egea.
  43. Gerwanski, J., Kordsachia, O., Velte, P. (2019), Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), pp. 750-770.
  44. Giakoumelou, A., Raimo, N., Petruzzella, F., Vitolla, F. (2023), Are vegans generous? An exploration of the success factors of vegan crowdfunding projects. British Food Journal, 125(7), pp. 2704-2720. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2022-0685
  45. Giannarakis, G. (2014), The determinants influencing the extent of CSR disclosure. International Journal of Law and Management, 56(5), 393-416. DOI: 10.1108/IJLMA-05-2013-002
  46. Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of accounting research, 28(1), 121-143. DOI: 10.2307/2491219
  47. Guldiken, O., Tupper, C., Nair, A., Yu, H. (2017), The impact of media coverage on IPO stock performance. Journal of Business Research, 72, pp. 24-32.
  48. Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., Ricceri, F. (2004), Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of intellectual capital, 5(2), pp. 282-293. DOI: 10.1108/14691930410533704
  49. Hafsi, T., Turgut, G. (2013), Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of business ethics, 112, pp. 463-479.
  50. Hill, C.W., Jones, T.M. (1992), Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of management studies, 29(2), pp. 131-154.
  51. Hiller, J.S. (2013), The benefit corporation and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, pp. 287-301.
  52. Hofstede, G.J. (1992), Modesty in modelling: on the applicability of interactive planning systems: with a case study in pot plant cultivation (Doctoral dissertation, Hofstede).
  53. Hoftede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Minkov, M. (2010), Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. McGraw-Hill.
  54. Kılıç, M., Kuzey, C. (2018), Determinants of forward-looking disclosures in integrated reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(1), pp. 115-144. DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-12-2016-1498
  55. Kreps, D. M., & Wilson, R. (1982), Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of economic theory, 27(2), 253-279. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8
  56. Krippendorff, K. (1980), Validity in content analysis.
  57. Krippendorff, K. (2018), Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
  58. Lenzi, D. (2016), Le società benefit. Giurisprudenza commerciale, pp. 894-920.
  59. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015), Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), pp. 409-424.
  60. Low, M., Samkin, G., & Li, Y. (2015). Voluntary reporting of intellectual capital: Comparing the quality of disclosures from New Zealand, Australian and United Kingdom universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), pp. 779-808. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-03-2015-0022
  61. Manes Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., Tartaglia Polcini, P. (2018), New trends in intellectual capital reporting: Exploring online intellectual capital disclosure in Italian universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(4), pp. 814-835. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-09-2017-0119
  62. Marchi, L. (2019). Governo delle aziende e creazione di valore: da una prospettiva finanziaria ad una prospettiva economico-sociale, Management Control, 1. pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-001001
  63. Marchi, L. (2020), Dalla crisi allo sviluppo sostenibile: il ruolo dei sistemi di misurazione e controllo. Management Control, 3, pp. 5-16. Di: 10.3280/MACO2020-003001.
  64. Mariani, M., Cardi, M., D'Ercole, F., Raimo, N., Vitolla, F. (2023), Make it easy: the effect of prospectus readability on IPO performance, Journal of Accounting Literature. DOI: 10.1108/JAL-07-2023-0115
  65. Marrone, A., Pontrelli, V., Oliva, L. (2024), Boards of Directors and High-Tech Sectors Affect ESG Disclosure Quality: An Empirical Analysis of Global Firms. International Journal of Business and Management, 18(6), pp. 1-97.
  66. McGuinness, P. B., Vieito, J. P., & Wang, M. (2017). The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 75-99.
  67. Miihkinen, A. (2018), Board characteristics and disclosure tone, In Nordic Corporate Governance Network Conference.
  68. Mion, G. (2020), Organizations with impact? A study on Italian benefit corporations reporting practices and reporting quality. Sustainability, 12(21), 9038.
  69. Mion, G., Loza Adaui, C.R. (2020), Understanding the purpose of benefit corporations: an empirical study on the Italian case, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 5(1), 4.
  70. Mosco, G.D. (2018), Purpose and object in social enterprise and benefit corporation. Legal Analysis of Economics, 17(1), pp. 81-94.
  71. Nour, A.I., Sharabati, A.A.A., Hammad, K.M. (2020), Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure. International Journal of Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility (IJSECSR), 5(1), pp. 20-41. DOI: 10.4018/IJSECSR.2020010102
  72. Paelman, V., Van Cauwenberge, P., Vander Bauwhede, H. (2023), Mission alignment with employees and financiers: Probing into the workings of B Corp certification, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(4), pp. 1632-1644.
  73. Palladino, R., Sasso, P., Profita, S., Carusone, R., Fiano, F., Giudice, M.D. (2022), Assessing the Italian benefit corporation disclosure: A content analysis, International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 14(3), pp. 217-235. DOI: 10.1504/IJMFA.2022.123888
  74. Picciaia, F., Mari, L.M. (2022), La rendicontazione non finanziaria nelle organizzazioni ibride: una analisi delle relazioni di impatto nelle società benefit italiane, Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale, 1, pp. 5-26.
  75. Porter, M. (1980), Competitive strategy. Free Press.
  76. Post, C., Rahman, N., Rubow, E. (2011), Green governance: Boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility, Business & society, 50(1), pp. 189-223. DOI: 10.1177/0007650310394642
  77. Prado-Lorenzo, J.M., Garcia-Sanchez, I.M. (2010), The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases, Journal of business ethics, 97, 391-424.
  78. Prado‐Lorenzo, J. M., Gallego‐Alvarez, I., Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M. (2009), Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(2), pp. 94-107.
  79. Radwan, E.K.A., Ali, N.O.H., Mohamed, M.K.A. (2023), Do free-floated shares and board characteristics influence corporate risk disclosure? An empirical analysis on conventional banks in a developing country, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. DOI: 10.1108/JFRA-11-2022-0436
  80. Raimo, N., Vitolla, F., Marrone, A., Rubino, M. (2021), Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), pp. 522-534.
  81. Robinson, G., Dechant, K. (1997), Building a business case for diversity, Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21-31.
  82. Rosenstein, S., Wyatt, J.G. (1990), Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of financial economics, 26(2), pp. 175-191. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-
  83. Ross, S.A. (1977), The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach, The bell journal of economics, pp. 23-40. DOI: 10.2307/3003485
  84. Salvi, A., Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., Giakoumelou, A., Raimo, N. (2021), Online information on digitalisation processes and its impact on firm value, Journal of Business Research, 124, pp. 437-444.
  85. Sciarelli, M., Cosimato, S., Landi, G. (2020), Benefit corporations approach to environmental, social and governance disclosure: A focus on Italy, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 10(4), 20190318.
  86. Solomon, J. (2007), Corporate governance and accountability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  87. Spence, M. (1973), Job market signaling, The quarterly journal of economics, 87(3), August, pp. 355-374.
  88. Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G., Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: the role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of cleaner production, 136, pp. 102-110.
  89. Tagesson, T., Blank, V., Broberg, P., Collin, S.O. (2009), What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(6), pp. 352-364.
  90. Velte, P. (2018), Is audit committee expertise connected with increased readability of integrated reports: Evidence from EU companies, Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(2), pp. 23-41.
  91. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M. (2020a), Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: An agency theory perspective, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), pp. 1152-1163.
  92. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020b). The role of board of directors in intellectual capital disclosure after the advent of integrated reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2188-2200.
  93. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., Garzoni, A. (2019), The impact of national culture on integrated reporting quality. A stakeholder theory approach. Business strategy and the environment, 28(8), pp. 1558-1571.
  94. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., Garzoni, A. (2022), Broadening the horizons of intellectual capital disclosure to the sports industry: evidence from top UEFA clubs, Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(1), 142-162. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-08-2020-0973
  95. Wang, J., Dewhirst, H. D. (1992), Boards of directors and stakeholder orientation, Journal of business ethics, 11, pp. 115-123. DOI: 10.1007/BF00872318
  96. Zampone, G., Nicolò, G., Sannino, G., De Iorio, S. (2024), Gender diversity and SDG disclosure: the mediating role of the sustainability committee, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(1), pp. 171-193. DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0151.

Arcangelo Marrone, Lara Oliva, Vincenzo Pontrelli, Angela Rella, L’impatto delle caratteristiche del Consiglio di Amministrazione sulla disclosure del beneficio comune: un’analisi empirica nelle aziende benefit in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2/2024, pp 39-63, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002003