Port logistics system competitiveness: the case study of the port of naples

Titolo Rivista ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA
Autori/Curatori Luca Ammendola, Maria Pia Masia
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2014/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 19 P. 77-95 Dimensione file 191 KB
DOI 10.3280/EI2014-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The efficiency of a port logistics system is strategically crucial for the competition of a country. Mediterranean port logistic competitiveness ability gains a new importance. The port logistics system of Campania represents a good example of it. Considering that all this opens up a new horizon of competition chances for Campania’s port system, we ask ourselves which kind of relationship could exist between a port system, its logistic efficiency and its geographic location. Taking into account all that we highlighted till now, is reasonable to ask ourselves if: the geo-strategic location of a territory by itself could be decisive for the port’s competitiveness. Trough a literature review of articles, selected in a Journal Rankings developed by the Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, a correlation between port competition, a favourable geo-economic position and the infrastructure equipment is theorized. The hypotheses have been validated by analysing the case of the port logistics system of the Port of Naples. The results show that neither positive correspondence between geographic position and port competition exist. The second one seems to be more directly interconnected to the infrastructure equipment, in particular to the dry port logistics one. In the discussion of the results, we ascertained that a favorable geo-economic position, although potentially a competitive factor is not a determining one. It is more important to have a range of efficient logistical port infrastructure. It is very important to have an efficient logistical port infrastructure. It is a key factor for country competitiveness, as evidenced by the comparison with other international port contexts. These need a deeper understanding, even in relation to the potential implications (managerial, economic, social) that could derive from this. Theoretical and practical implications of these results have been argued, as well as the importance of some competitive factors as public policies and port governance. Even if the hypothesis has been tested on a significant case study, we are aware that this work can be further enhanced by extending the survey to a larger sample of cases, as well as making use of a comparative analysis between Italian and international port systems. The study represents a first attempt to analyse relations between logistical port infrastructure, country competitiveness and geographic position. In conclusion, it would be interesting to consider even port governance among the competitive factors, as it uses public and private financial resources and often decides on their final use.;

Keywords:Port logistics, Intermodal logistics and integrated logistics, Dry port system.

  1. Ambrosetti (2011). Il rilancio della portualità e della logistica italiana come leva strategica per la crescita e la competitività del Paese. Milano.
  2. Arvis J.F., Mustra M.A., Ojala L., Shepherd B., Saslavsky D. (2012). Connecting to compete 2012: Trade logistics in the global economy. The Logistics Performance Index and its indicators. Washington: The World Bank.
  3. Assoporti (2011). Alcuni dati relativi ai movimenti merci e passeggeri nei principali porti italiani. Roma.
  4. Autorità Portuale di Napoli (2010). Piano OperativoTriennale 2011-2013.
  5. Autorità Portuale di Napoli (2013). Piano OperativoTriennale porti di Napoli e Castellammare di Stabia 2013-2015.
  6. Beretta E., Dalle Vacche A., Migliardi A- (2009). Il sistema portuale italiano: un’indagine sui fattori di competitività e di sviluppo. Banca d’Italia.
  7. Bettucci M., Dellantonio M., 2005, La gestione dei flussi tra industria e retail. Logistica e Management, 159.
  8. Bosso L. (2009). La Campania fa sistema per sviluppare nuove vie marittime nel Mediterraneo e nei Balcani. Il Sole 24 Ore, 28 marzo, p. 55.
  9. Carta M. (a cura di) (2006). Reti mediterranee, interconnessioni materiali ed immateriali per l’integrazione dei mercati. Convegno 10-11 febbraio 2006, Palermo.
  10. Camerano S., Perretti M.E., Palazzo A., Screpanti S. (2012). Porti e logistica. Cassa dei depositi e prestiti, maggio 2012.
  11. Castillo-Manzano J.I., Asencio-Flores J.P. (2012). Competition Between New Port Governance Models on the Iberian Peninsula. Transport Reviews, 32, 4: 519-537, DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.662538
  12. Catapano P. (2012). Il sistema intermodale campano: raccordo tra strutture portuali, piattaforme logistiche ed interportuali. VIII Rapporto sulla Qualità dell’ambiente urbano. Focus su Porti, Aeroporti e Interporti. Roma.
  13. Censis, Assoporti (2008). La portualità come fattore di sviluppo e modernizzazione, Analisi dell’impatto economico e occupazionale dei porti commerciali italiani, 20 maggio Roma. Chang Y.F. (2006). The Developing Environment of Logistic Business in Ports of Taiwan. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 9, 1: 110-116.
  14. Choi Y. (2011). The efficiency of major ports under logistics risk in northeast asia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 28, 1: 111-123.
  15. Christopher M. (1992). Logistics and Supply Chain Management. UK: Pitman Publishing.
  16. CommissioneEuropea (2009). Towards a better integrated trans-European transport network at the service of the common transport policy. Council Conclusions on the Commission. Green Paper: TEN-T policy review, 2949th Transport, Telecommunication and Energy Council Meeting, Luxembourg, 11 and 12 June 2009.
  17. Coppola F.S., Panaro A. (2008). Trasporti, logistica e politiche di sviluppo pubbliche: i risultati di un osservatorio sul Mezzogiorno. X° Riunione della Società Italiana di Economia del Trasporti e della Logistica. Sassari, 18-20 giugno 2008.
  18. Cozzolino A. (2007). Operatori di servizi logistici integrati. Tendenze evolutive nel governo della disaggregazione produttiva. Sinergie, 73-74.
  19. De Martino M., Morvillo A. (2008). Maritime Policy & Management: The flagship journal of international shipping and port research. Maritime Policy & Management, 6, 35: 571-589, DOI: 10.1080/03088830802469477
  20. DREWRY (2009). The Drewry Annual Container Market Review and Forecast 2009/10. London: Drewry Shipping Consultants LTD.
  21. Dunn B. (2013). Ports pushing for increased infrastructure capital to increase competitiveness. Canadian Sailings, december 2013.
  22. Dooms M., Verbeke A., Haezendonck E. (2013). Stakeholder management and path dependence in large-scale transport infrastructure development: the port of Antwerp case (1960–2010). Journal of Transport Geography, 27: 14-25, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.06.002
  23. ESPO (European Sea Port Organisation) (2014). Annual Report 2013-14, Bruxelles.
  24. ESPO (European Sea Port Organisation) (2013). ESPO Port Performance Dashboard, Bruxelles.
  25. Esposito De Falco S. (2012). Genesi ed evoluzione dell’impresa. Padova: CEDAM.
  26. Esposito De Falco S., Simoni M. (2014). The Effect of Public Export Incentives on Italian Textile and Fashion SMEs. In The Evolution of the Italian Textile and fashion Industry: from Tradition to Innovation. International Studies Of Management & Organization. Spring 2014, 44, 1: 70-83.
  27. Fan L., Wilson W.W., Dahl B. (2012). Congestion, port expansion and spatial competition for US container imports. Transportation Research Part E, 48: 1121-1136, DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.04.006
  28. Filobokova L.I. (2013). Economic and geographical position of the region and of the specific methodological approaches to the management of its development. State Counsellor, Issue 4: 79-85.
  29. Forte E., Siviero L. (2007). Logistica economica, intermodalità e modelli in rete: un’applicazione ai servizi ferroviari intermodali espressi. I Trasporti ed il mercato globale, a cura di Polidoro G., Borruso G., Danielis R. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 9-14.
  30. Forte E., D’Ambra L., Siviero L. (2011). Interporti in Italia tra intermodalita e retroportualita: un’analisi di efficienza con frontiera di produzione stocastica. XIII Scientific Meeting of the Italian Society of Transport Economics (SIET). Transport systems in the Mediterranean area: infrastructure, competitiveness. Messina 16-17 giugno 2011.
  31. Franc P., Van der Horst M. (2010). Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 18 (4): 557-566, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.004.GedaschkoA.(2008).ThePortofHamburg:Europe’slogisticspowerhouse.TheJournalofCommerce,november,SpecialAdvertisingSection
  32. Gentile D., Marchetiello D. (2010). Il trasporto merci e la logistica in Campania. Tema, 2.
  33. Golea P., Popa C. (2011). The strategical management of port competition. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 6 (1): 498-501.
  34. Growe F.G. (2009). Logistics innovation: a literature-based conceptual framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, 3, DOI: 10.1108/09574090911002823
  35. Guercilena G. (2010). Interporti. Scommessa rotaie. L’Impresa, 5: 20-27.
  36. Haezendonck E., van den Broeck J. (2011). Analysing the lobby-effect of port competitiveness’ determinants: a stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 36: 113-123, DOI: 10.1007/s11123-011-0208-4
  37. Iannone F. (2009). Analisi economica e pianificazione della logistica terrestre containerizzata del sistema portuale ed interportuale campano. XI Riunione Scientifica del Convegno organizzato dalla Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica-Trieste, 15-18 giugno 2009.
  38. Iannone F., Thore S. (2010). An economic logistics model for the multimodal inland distribution of maritime containers. International Journal of Transport Economics, 37 (3): 281-326.
  39. Iannone F. (2012b). The private and social cost efficiency of port hinterland container distribution through a regional logistics system. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 46 9: 1424-1448, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.019
  40. Iannone F. (2012a). A model optimizing the port-hinterland logistics of containers: The case of the Campania region in Southern Italy. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14: 33-72, DOI: 10.1057/mel.2011.16
  41. Iozzolino I. (2004). La politica europea dei trasporti. Dai ten-tpriority projects ai corridoi pancontinentali. Bollettino della Società geografica italiana, 9 (2): 413-430.
  42. Ishi M., Tae-Woo Lee P., Tezuka K., Chang Y.-T. (2013). A game theoretical analysis of port competition. Transportation Research Part E, 49: 92-106, DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2012.07.007
  43. Istat (2014). Atlante statistico territoriale delle infrastrutture, in http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/41899.
  44. Lambert D.M. (2001). The supply chain management and logistics controversy. In Brewer A.M. Button K.J., Hensher D.A. (ed.). Handbook of logistics and supply chain management, 2, Pergamon.
  45. Libardo A., Nocera S. (a cura di) (2006). Interporti scali merci centri logistici e sviluppo competitivo. Atti del Convegno, Venezia, 17 novembre 2005.
  46. Masiulis A., Vasilis Vasiliauskas A., Jakubauskas G. (2009). The impact of transport on the competitiveness of national economy. Transport, XXIV (2). 93-99, DOI: 10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.93-99
  47. Massaroni E. (2002). La logistica nell’approccio sistemico al governo dell’impresa. Padova: Cedam.
  48. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2011). Piano della logistica. Analisi dei processi di filiera. Morfologia dei flussi logistici internazionali “feelings & insight” del sistema logistico italiano, Roma.
  49. NEA (2010). Ports and their connections within the TEN-T. Final Report, NEA, Zoetermeer, December.
  50. Notteboom T. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains: European challenges, Anversa, DOI: 10.1787/235371341338.
  51. Ricklefts J.D. (2006). How to fund port infrastructure. The Journal of Commerce, 7.
  52. Ryckewaert M. (2010). The Ten-Year Plan for the port of Antwerp (1956–1965): a linear city along the river. Planning Perspectives, 25, 3: 303-322.
  53. Rodrigue J.P., Notteboom T. (2009). The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships. Maritime Policy & Management, 36 (2): 165-183, DOI: 10.1080/03088830902861086
  54. Russo I. (2007). Linee di sviluppo per l’internazionalizzazione di nuove piattaforme logistiche. Il casointerporti. Sinergie, 73-74: 469-498.
  55. Sheffi Y. (2013). Logistics intensive clusters: Global competitiveness and regional growth. Handbook ofglobal logistics: transportation in international supply chains. NY: Springer.
  56. Siviero L., Carlucci F. (2009). Competitività ed efficienza delle infrastrutture terminali del trasporto marittimo: analisi del sistema dei porti nel Mediterraneo e livello di integrazione logistica. XI Riunione Scientifica del Convegno organizzato dalla Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, Trieste, 15-18 giugno 2009.
  57. Song D.W. (2002). Regional container port competition and co-operation: the case of Hong Kong and South China. Journal of Transport Geography, 10: 99-110, DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00003-0
  58. SRM (2009). Porti e territorio. Scenari economici, analisi del traffico e competitività delle infrastrutture portuali del Mezzogiorno. Napoli: Giannini Editore.
  59. Sujeta L., Navickas V. (2014). The impact of port logistics systems on a country‘s competitiveness. Economics and Management, 19 (1).
  60. Unctad (2011). Chapter 4, Port and multimodal transport developments. Report 2011. Review of maritime transport, 85-108.
  61. Unisa (2013). Rapporto di ricerca Tunnel.
  62. UIR – Unione Interporti Riuniti (2013). Il sistema degli interporti italiani nel 2012.
  63. Uniontrasporti (2011). I Rapporto sullo stato delle infrastrutture in Italia: criticità di oggi, priorità di domani. Roma.
  64. Veenstra A., Zuidwijk R., van Asperen E. (2012). The extended gate concept for container terminals: expanding the notion of dry ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 14(1). DOI: 10.1057/mel.2011.15
  65. World Economic Forum (2012). The Global competitiveness report 2012-2013. Geneva: World EconomicForum.

Luca Ammendola, Maria Pia Masia, Port logistics system competitiveness: the case study of the port of naples in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 2/2014, pp 77-95, DOI: 10.3280/EI2014-002005