La rendicontazione economico-finanziaria degli Uffici giudiziari: un’analisi esplorativa

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Elisa Bonollo, Costanza Di Fabio, Lorenzo Leto, Paola Ramassa
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 115-139 Dimensione file 295 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study analyzes the financial information published by Italian Tribunals and Courts of Appeal, based on the idea that adequate monitoring tools are es-sential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the justice system. In fact, the use of financial resources, along with the efficiency indicators based on resolution time, is a relevant aspect, from a perspective of both transparen-cy and performance evaluation. In particular, the analysis focuses on all finan-cial data voluntarily published as part of the social reports of Italian Tribunals and Courts of Appeal between 2010 and 2022. The findings highlight areas for improvement in terms of the availability and completeness of quantitative data and the use of qualitative information to clarify the dynamics and determi-nants of outcomes. The study also identifies opportunities for reflection on the content of judicial social reports, thus contributing to the literature on external reporting of the justice system from an accountability perspective.

Parole chiave:Judicial offices, Economic and Financial Reporting, Accountabil-ity, Social Report

  1. Siboni, B. (2007), La rendicontazione sociale negli enti locali. Analisi dello stato dell’arte, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  2. Alcaraz-Quiles, F.J., Navarro-Galera, A., Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2015), Factors determining online sustainability reporting by local governments, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), pp. 79-109.
  3. Alesani, D., Marcuccio, M., Trinchero, E. (2005), Bilancio sociale e aziende sanitarie: stato dell’arte e prospettive di sviluppo, Mecosan, 55, pp. 9-34.
  4. Alonso-Almeida, M.M., Marimon, F., Casani, F., Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. (2015), Diffusion of sustainability reporting in universities: current situation and future perspectives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, pp. 144-154.
  5. Antonucci, L., Crocetta, C., D’Ovidio, F.D. (2014), Evaluation of Italian Judicial System, Procedia Economics and Finance, 17, pp. 121-130.
  6. Anselmi, L. (2003), Percorsi aziendali per le pubbliche amministrazioni, Torino, Giappichelli.
  7. Sinclair, A. (1995), The chameleon of accountability forms and discourses, Accountability, Organization and Society, 20(2/3), pp. 219-237.
  8. Bartolomeo, F., Bianco, M. (2016), La performance del sistema giudiziario italiano, un confronto con i principali sistemi giudiziari europei. -- http://www.italiadecide.it/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/23012017_La_performance_del_sistema_giudiziario_italiano_v_2.0.pdf.
  9. Behn, R.D. (2001), Rethinking Democratic Accountability, Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
  10. Bellringer, A., Ball, A., Craig, R. (2011), Reasons for sustainability reporting by New Zealand local governments, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), pp. 126-138.
  11. Bianco, M., Giacomelli, S. (2004), Efficienza nella giustizia e imprenditorialità: il caso italiano, Economia e politica industriale, 124, pp. 89-114.
  12. Biondi, L, Bracci, E. (2018), Sustainability, Popular and Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: A Fad and Fashion Perspective, Sustainability. 10(9), 3112.
  13. Borgonovi, E. (2004), Principi e sistemi aziendali per le amministrazioni pubbliche, Milano, Egea.
  14. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998), Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publication.
  15. Civicum, (2014), Giustizia: ma quanto costa e quanto rende? -- http://qualitapa.gov.it/sitoarcheologico/fileadmin/mirror/immagini/Locandina_Civicum.pdf.
  16. Civitillo, R., Fusco, F., Ricci, P. (2022), Accountability e rendicontazione sociale nel sistema giudiziario italiano, CERIDAP, 4, pp. 98-114.
  17. Comite, U. (2011), Il ruolo del bilancio sociale per il miglioramento dell'accountability e delle scelte di governance dei tribunali. Un’analisi descrittiva ai fini dell'evidenza empirica, Economia aziendale online, 1, pp. 93-115.
  18. Comite, U. (2013), Accountability e bilancio sociale nei tribunali, Padova, Cedam.
  19. Contini, F., Mohr, R. (2007), Reconciling independence and accountability in judicial systems, Utrecht Law Review, 3(2), pp. 26-43.
  20. Contini, F, Viapiana, F. (2016), Quanto costa la giustizia? I tribunali italiani tra efficacia ed efficienza. -- https://www.questionegiustizia.it/articolo/quanto-costa-la-giustizia-i-tribunali-italiani-tra-efficacia-ed-efficienza_17-02-2020.php.
  21. Denison, D.V., Standora, L.C. (2006), Management-Oriented Cost Analysis: An Application to New York State Trial Courts, Public Performance & Management Review, 29(3), pp. 307-333.
  22. Domingues, A.R., Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Ramos, T.B. (2017), Sustainability reporting in public sector organisations: exploring the relation between the reporting process and organisational change management for sustainability, Journal of Environmental Management, 192, pp. 292-301.
  23. Douglas, J.W., Hartley, R.E. (2003), The politics of court budgeting in the states: is judicial independence threatened by the budgetary process?, Public Administration Review, 63(49), pp. 441-454.
  24. Dubofsky, J.E. (2007), Judicial performance review: a balance between judicial independence and public accountability, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 34(1), pp. 315-342.
  25. European Commission (2023), The 2023 EU Justice scorebord. -- https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rule-law/eu-justice-scoreboard_en#scoreboards.
  26. Farneti, F., Guthrie, J. (2009), Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations: Why they report, Accounting Forum, 33(2), pp. 89-98.
  27. Farneti, F., Guthrie, J. and Canetto M. (2019), Social reports of an Italian provincial government: a longitudinal analysis, Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), pp. 580-612.
  28. Farneti, F., Siboni, B. (2011). An analysis of the Italian governmental guidelines and of the local governments’ practices for social reports. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2(1), pp.101-125.
  29. Fusco, F., Civitillo, R., Ricci, P., Morawska, S., Pustulka, K., Banasik, P. (2022), Sustainability reporting in justice systems: a comparative research in two European countries, Meditari Accounting Research, 30(6), pp. 1629-1657.
  30. Gray, R. (2005), Taking a Long View on What We Now Know About Social and Environmental Accountability and Reporting, Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory, 9(1), pp. 1-31.
  31. Guthrie, J, Farneti, F. (2008), GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations, Public Money and Management, 28(6), pp. 361-366.
  32. Hinna, L. (2004), Il bilancio sociale nelle amministrazioni pubbliche, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  33. Hood, C. (1991), A public management for all season?, Public Administration, 69 (1), pp. 3-19.
  34. Hood, C. (1995), The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme, Accounting, Organization & Society, 20, pp. 93-109.
  35. Ingrassia, R. (2014), Accountability, organizzazione e rendicontazione sociale nelle amministrazioni giudiziarie italiane: alcune evidenze empiriche, Studi organizzativi, 2, pp. 76-104.
  36. Kaur, A., Lodhia, S.K. (2019), Sustainability accounting, accountability and reporting in the public sector” Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), pp. 498-504.
  37. Kettiger, D. (2005), Swiss courts move towards an outcome-orientation, EGPA Conference, pp. 1-12.
  38. Kettiger, D., Lienhard, A., Langbrock, P., Fabri, M. (2019), Court management: a young field of public management, In E. Ongaro (Ed.), Public Administration in Europe, pp. 309-315, Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Lapsley, I. (2009), New public management: the cruelest invention of the human spirit?, Abacus, 45(1), pp. 1-21.
  40. Lepore, L., Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., Alvino, F. (2010), Un modello per la valutazione delle performance dei tribunali: un'analisi empirica, Azienda Pubblica, 3, pp. 391-415.
  41. Lepore, L., Pisano, S., Alvino, F., Paolone, F. (2019), The dark side of e-justice implementation. An empirical investigation of the relation between cultural orientation and information system success, In Lazazzara et al. (eds.), Organizing for Digital Innovation, pp. 49-61, Springer.
  42. Lewin, A.Y., Morey, R.C., Cook, T.J. (1982), Evaluating the administrative efficiency of courts, Omega, 10(4), 1982, pp. 401-411.
  43. Lodhia, S., Jacobs, K., Park, Y.J. (2012), Driving public sector environmental reporting: the disclosure practices of Australian commonwealth departments, Public Management Review, 14(5), pp. 631-647.
  44. Magalhaes, P.C., Garoupa, N. (2020), Judicial Performance and Trust in Legal Systems: Findings from a Decade of Surveys in over 20 European Countries, Social Science Quarterly, 101(5), pp. 1743-1760.
  45. Mak, E. (2008), The European judicial organisation in a new paradigm: the influence of principles of ‘new public management’ on the organisation of the European courts, European Law Journal, 14(6), pp. 718-734.
  46. Manes-Rossi, F., Nicolò, G., Argento, D. (2020), Non-financial reporting formats in public sector organizations: a structured literature review, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(4), pp. 639-669.
  47. Marcuccio, M., Steccolini, I. (2005), Social and environmental reporting in local authorities. A new Italian fashion?, Public Management Review, 7(2), pp. 155-76.
  48. Mathews, M.R. (1997), Twenty-five years of social and environmental accounting research. Is there a silver jubilee to celebrate?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(4), pp. 481-531.
  49. Melles, G. (2020), Sustainability reporting in Australian universities: case study of campus sustainability employing institutional analysis”, In Leal Filho, Borges de Brito, Frankenberger (Eds), International Business, Trade and Institutional Sustainability. Cham, World Sustainability Series, Springer.
  50. Monfardini, P., Barretta, A.D., Ruggiero P. (2013), Seeking legitimacy: social reporting in the healthcare sector, Accounting Forum, 37(1), pp. 54-66.
  51. Mussari, R., Monfardini, P. (2010), Practices of social reporting in public sector and non-profit organizations. An Italian perspective, Public Management Review, 12(4), pp. 487-492.
  52. Niemann, L., Hoppe, T. (2018), Sustainability reporting by local government: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers, Public Management Review, 20(1), pp. 201-223.
  53. Nissi, E., Giacalone, M., Cusatelli, C. (2019), The efficiency of the Italian Judicial System: a two stage data envelopment analysis approach, Socio-economic indicators for performance evaluate and quality assess, November, pp. 395-407.
  54. Ongaro, E. (2003), Problematiche emergenti di accountability nel contesto del decentramento e delle riforme del management pubblico in Pezzani (ed.), L’accountability delle amministrazioni pubbliche, Milano, Egea.
  55. Paletta, A., Tieghi, M. (Eds) (2007), Il bilancio sociale su base territoriale. Dalla comunicazione istituzionale alla public governance, Torino, Isedi.
  56. Parker, L. (2005), Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary box, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(6), pp. 842-60.
  57. Pavone, P. (2022), La rendicontazione sociale nel settore giudiziario: il caso della procura di Napoli, Azienda Pubblica, 4, pp. 381-398.
  58. Paynter, S., Kearney, R.C. (2010), Who watches the watchmen? Evaluating judicial performance in the American States. Administration and Society, 41(8), pp. 923-953.
  59. Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G. (2000), Public management reform. A comparative analysis, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  60. Rahaman, A.S., Lawrence, S., Roper, J. (2004), Social and environmental reporting at the VRA: institutionalised legitimacy or legitimation crisis, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(1), pp. 35-56.
  61. Ricci P. (2014), La rendicontazione di sostenibilità nei tribunali, in Ricci P., Siboni B., Nardo M.T., La rendicontazione di sostenibilità, pp. 147-192, Roma, Rirea.
  62. Ricci, P., Fusco F. (2016), Social reporting in the Italian justice system: Milan’s court experience, Public Integrity, 18(3), pp. 254-268.
  63. Ricci, P., Fusco F. (2020), Sustainability reporting in public sector: a comparative study in the Italian Justice System, RIREA, Maggio-giugno-luglio-agosto, pp. 200-215.
  64. Ricci, P., Pavone, P. (2020), The experience of social reporting in Italian judicial offices. The laboratory of the public prosecutor’s office in Naples, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), pp. 713-729.
  65. Romzek, B.S., Dubnik, M.J. (1987), Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy, Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp. 227-238.
  66. Shany, Y. (2012), Assessing the effectiveness of international courts: a goal-based approach, The American Journal of International Law, 106(2), pp. 225-270.
  67. Spigelman, J. (2001), The “new public management” and the courts, Australian Law Journal, 75, pp. 748-760.
  68. Steccolini, I. (2004), Accountability e sistemi informativi negli enti locali. Dal rendiconto al bilancio sociale, Torino, Giappichelli.
  69. Tan, L.K., Egan, M. (2018), The public accountability value of a triple bottom line approach to performance reporting in the water sector, Australian Accounting Review, 28(2), pp. 235-250.
  70. Vecchi, G. (2013), La modernizzazione del sistema giudiziario italiano: dal modello top-down alla governance locale? Il nuovo ruolo dei territorio nel sostegno all’innovazione negli uffici giudiziari, Studi organizzativi, 1, pp. 150-190.
  71. Vecchi, G. (2018a), La valutazione della performance negli uffici giudiziari come strumento di politica pubblica, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  72. Vecchi, G. (2018b). Performance management uses, outcome measures and mechanisms-based explanations. The case of the judicial sector. In E. Borgonovi et al. (eds.), Outcome-based performance management in the public sector, pp. 331-348, Springer.
  73. Vinnari, E. and Laine M. (2013), Just a passing fad? The diffusion and decline of environmental reporting in the Finnish water sector, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), pp. 1107-1134.
  74. Voermans, W. (2007), Judicial transparency furthering public accountability for new judiciaries. Utrecht Law Review, 3(1), pp. 148-160.
  75. Volacu, A. (2018), Justice, efficiency, and the new public management, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(3), pp. 404-414.
  76. World Bank (2020), Doing business 2020: comparing business regulation in 190 economies, Washington, World Bank.

Elisa Bonollo, Costanza Di Fabio, Lorenzo Leto, Paola Ramassa, La rendicontazione economico-finanziaria degli Uffici giudiziari: un’analisi esplorativa in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2/2024, pp 115-139, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002006