Polluter Pays Principle in power production to gradually phase-out fossil fuels in Italy

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Andrea Molocchi, Emanuela Recchini, Angelica Tudini
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 26 P. 203-228 Dimensione file 186 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2019-001013
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The paper provides an analysis of Italian environmental taxes on electricity production and consumption in order to verify their consistency with the Polluters Pays Principle (PPP). The environmental external costs of air emissions generated by Italian thermal power plants are compared to environmental taxes paid by the same plants (fuel excise duties, SO2/NOx tax, ETS and levy on energy producers). As a basis for the comparison, the paper applies the methods for environmental external costs assessment recommended by the National Guidelines for the Evaluation of Investment Projects (2017). The PPP comparison highlights that the external costs related to thermal power plants emissions amount to about € 9,400 million (53.8 euro per MWh produced) whereas only € 350 million are actually paid through the above-mentioned environmental taxes (3.8% of the external costs generated). Indeed, the environmental taxes directly paid by all electricity customers in their bills (excise duty on electricity, system charges for subsidising renewable energy sources) are of the same order of magnitude of the external costs of power plants. However, seen from the PPP point of view, these two taxes have the drawback of environmental tax payment being made also by "green" customers, i.e. whose electricity is bought with the guarantee of being "produced from renewable energy sources". The authors argue that environmental taxes directly falling on electricity producers are consistent with the PPP and provide in principle a better price signal to electricity markets, rather than environmental taxes directly paid by customers. Shifting current environmental taxes from electricity consumption to production would support the implementation of two of the main targets of the National Energy Strategy (2017), such as the progressive phase-out of coal at 2025 and the 55% RES electric target at 2030, while increasing the coherence and fairness of taxes paid on electricity.

Keywords:Polluter pays principle, environmental taxes, external costs, power production, climate and energy policy, air emissions.

Jel codes:H23, Q48, Q42, Q51

  1. Antenucci M. and Governatori M. (2015) Subsidies to fossil energy consumption in Italy: assessment and interaction with the electricity market. In: Kreiser L. et al. (eds.). Environmental pricing. Critical Issues of Environmental Taxation Vol. XVI. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. -- https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/environmental-pricing.ATSE – Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering (2009). The Hidden
  2. Costs of Electricity: Externalities of Power Generation in Australia. ATSE, Victoria. -- https://www.atse.org.au/Documents/reports/the-hidden-costs-of-electricity.pdf.
  3. Baumol W. and Oates W. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173513.005
  4. Buchanan J.M. (1969). External Diseconomies, Corrective Taxes, and Market Structure. The American Economic Review, 59(1): 174-177. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811104?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
  5. CE Delft (2010). D. Bennink et al., VME Energy Transition Strategy – External Costs and Benefits of Electricity Generation, Report CE Delft, January 2010. -- http://www.cedelft.eu/publicatie/external_costs_of_transport_in_europe/1258.
  6. Ferone N. (2014). “Aspetti fiscali legati alla cogenerazione”. Presentazione slide al convegno Cogenerazione ad alto rendimento: prospettive, applicazioni e vantaggi per le imprese. Confindustria Mantova, 29 ottobre 2014. -- https://www.assind.mn.it/public/files/Nello%20Ferone-66789.pdf.
  7. Fontana M. and Molocchi A. (2002). Le stime dei costi esterni del trasporto, Parte I del volume Fisco e Pedaggi per ridurre i costi del trasporto: la metodologia. Bollettino Economico sul settore dei trasporti, Centro Studi Federtrasporto, n. 12, ottobre: 7-128. -- http://www.federtrasporto.it/images/stories/pdf/Bollettino-economico/Bollettino-n12.pdf.
  8. Gullì F. and Chernyavs’ka L. (2013). Theory and Empirical Evidence for Carbon Cost Pass-Through to Energy Prices. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1): 349-367.
  9. INFRAS, CE Delft, Fraunhofer ISI (2008). Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector. Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT), Version 1.1, Delft, CE. -- https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/handbook_on_external_costs_of_transport_2014_0.pdf.
  10. Ispra (2013). Tabella parametri standard nazionali. Coefficienti utilizzati per l’inventario delle emissioni di CO2 nell’inventario nazionale UNFCCC. -- http://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/emission_trading/tabella_coefficienti_standard_nazionali_2010_2012_v2_rdl_clean.pdf.
  11. Ispra (2017). Fattori di emissione per le sorgenti di combustione stazionarie. -- http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/it/sia-ispra/serie-storiche-emissioni/fattori-di-emissione-per-le-sorgentidi-combustione-stazionarie-in-italia/view.
  12. Istat (2016). Air emission NAMEA, Istat Datawarehouse, December 2016 edition. -- http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=dccn_contiematmrev2.
  13. Istat (2017). Environmental tax revenue, Istat Datawarehouse, November 2017 edition. -- http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCCN_IMPAMB1.
  14. Kuik O., Brander L. and Tol R.S. (2009). Marginal abatement costs of greenhouse gas emissions: A meta-analysis. Energy Policy, 37(4): 1395-1403. -- http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50102.
  15. La Camera F., Ravazzi Douvan A. (2010). Scale of Economic Activity and Environmental Taxation. Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation, Vol. VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press. -- https://global.oup.com/academic/product/critical-issues-in-environmentaltaxation-9780199597307?prevSortField=1&start=20&prevNumResPerPage=20&lang=en&cc=it.
  16. Macknick J., Newmark R., Heath G. and Hallett H.C. (2011). A Review of Operational Water Consumptions and Withdrawal factors for Electricity generating Technologies. NREL, March. -- https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/50900.pdf.
  17. Mattmann M., Logar I. and Brower R. (2016). Wind power externalities: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 127, July: 23-36. -- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.005.
  18. MEF (2016). Bollettino delle entrate tributarie 2015. Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, marzo 2016. -- http://www.finanze.it/export/sites/finanze/it/.content/Documenti/entrate_tributarie_2015/Bollettino-entrate-Dicembre-2015-v6.pub.pdf.
  19. MIT (2017). Linee Guida per la valutazione degli investimenti in opere pubbliche (Guidelines for the Evaluation of Investments in Public Infrastructures). Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, June 2017. -- http://www.mit.gov.it/node/5272.
  20. Molocchi A. (2010). Electric cars or high-efficiency transport networks? Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment LIII(1). DOI: 10.3280/EFE2010-001002
  21. De Paoli L. (2015). The fight against climate change: some proposals for action for Italy in Europe. Economics and policy of energy and the environment, 1: 9-27. DOI: 10.3280/EFE2015-001002
  22. De Paoli L. (2016). The EU Emission Trading System: for an effective and viable reform. Economics and policy of energy and the environment, 1: 5-40. DOI: 10.3280/EFE2016-001001
  23. Dorigoni S. and Gullì F. (2002). Energy tax harmonization in the European Union: A proposal based on the internalization of environmental external costs. European Environment 12(1): 17-34. DOI: 10.3280/EFE2016-001001
  24. Ecofys (2014). Subsidies and Costs of EU Energy, a report commissioned by the European Commission, 11 November 2014. -- https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ECOFYS%202014%20Subsidies%20and%20costs%20of%20EU%20energy_11_Nov.pdf.
  25. EIA (2018). Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2018, US Energy Information Administration, March 2018. -- https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf.
  26. European Commission (1995). Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport. Policy options for internalising the external costs of transport in the EU. Communication by Neil Kinnock to the Commission, COM (95)691. -- http://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/com95_691_en.pdf.
  27. European Commission (2008). European Commission, Directorate-General Regional policy, Final report submitted by TRT and CSIL. Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Publications Office of the European Union, July 2008. -- https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/cost/guide2008_en.pdf.
  28. European Commission (2014). European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban policy (2014), Sartori D. et al., Guide to Cost - Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic appraisal tool for Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Publications Office of the European Union, December 2014. -- https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/cba_guide.pdf.
  29. European Commission (2016). Commission Staff Working Document, Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/27/EU on Energy Efficiency, SWD (2016) 405 final -- https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_en_impact_assessment_part1_v4_0.pdf.
  30. European Parliament and Council (2018). Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action.
  31. Eurostat (2013). Environmental taxes – A statistical guide, European Union, Luxembourg, Publication Office of the European Union. -- http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5936129/KS-GQ-13-005-EN.PDF.
  32. Exiopol (2010). Wolf Müller, Philipp Preiss, Volker Klotz, Rainer Friedrich, External Cost Values for EE SUT Framework, Final report providing external cost values to be applied in an EE SUT framework, Exiopol DIII.1.b-2, IER University Stuttgart, march 2010. -- http://www.feem-project.net/exiopol/index.php.
  33. ExternE (1995). European Commission DGXII, Externalities of Energy, voll. 1-6, EUR 16520-16525, Bruxelles.
  34. ExternE (1999). European Commission DGXII, Externalities of Energy, voll. 7-10, EUR 19083-18836-18887-18528, Bruxelles, 1999. -- http://www.externe.info/externe_d7/?q=node/4.
  35. ExternE (2005). Bickel P, Friedrich R., Externalities of Energy, Methodology update, 2005.-- http://www.externe.info/externe_d7/?q=node/30.
  36. Molocchi A. (2017). Chi inquina, paga? Tasse ambientali e sussidi dannosi per l’ambiente. Ipotesi di riforma alla luce dei costi esterni delle attività economiche in Italia (Does the Polluter Pay? Environmental Taxes and Environmentally Harmful Subsidies. Options for a reform based on the external costs of economic activities in Italy). Ufficio di Valutazione d’Impatto del Senato (Impact Assessment Office of the Republic’s Senate). Documento di valutazione n. 6, dicembre 2017. -- http://www.senato.it/4746?dossier=2295,
  37. http://www.senato.it/service/PDF/PDFServer/BGT/01078701.pdf (Executive Summary in English).
  38. Molocchi A. and Aspromonte D. (2013). Ecco il peso delle esternalità nell'economia italiana. Il contributo dell'analisi costi-benefici in chiave ambientale per migliorare il PIL. Nuova Energia, bimestrale dello sviluppo sostenibile, 5. -- http://www.ecbaproject.eu/it/eventi/117-esternalita-delleconomia-italiana.html.
  39. Molocchi A. and Aspromonte D. (2014). Pompe di calore elettriche a vantaggio dell’ambiente. Nuova Energia, bimestrale dello sviluppo sostenibile, n. 1. -- http://www.nuovaenergia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3943&Itemid=141.
  40. NEEDS (2008). Preiss P., Friedrich R. and Klotz V., Report on the procedure and data to generate averaged/aggregated data. Deliverable n. 1.1 - RS 3a, NEEDS project, 6th FRP -- http://www.needs-project.org/2009/Deliverables/RS3a%20D1.1.zip.
  41. NEEDS (2009). External costs from emerging electricity generation technologies. Deliverable n. 6.1 – RS1a, NEEDS project, 6th FRP. -- http://www.needs-project.org/2009/Deliverables/RS1a%20D6_1%20External%20costs%20of%20reference%20technologies %2024032009.pdf.
  42. NES (2017). Italian Ministry of Economic Development and Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea. National Energy Strategy, 10th November. -- https://www.mise.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/Testo-integrale-SEN-2017.pdf.
  43. OECD (2011). Taxation, Innovation and the Environment. OECD Green Growth Strategy series.
  44. Recchini E. (2016). Estimating emission permits in Italy. Joint OECD/UNECE Seminar on Implementation of SEEA, Geneva, 3-4 October 2016. -- http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.33/2016/mtg2/S4b1_Recchini_SEEA_implementation.pdf.
  45. Ricardo and AEA (2014). Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport. Report for the European Commission – DG MOVE, 8th January 2014. -- https://ec.europa.eu/transport/sites/transport/files/themes/sustainable/studies/doc/2014-handbook-external-costs-transport.pdf.
  46. Samadi (2017). The Social Costs of Electricity Generation – Categorising Different Types of Costs and Evaluating Their Respective Relevance, Energies, (10)356.
  47. Terna (2017). Dati statistici sull’energia elettrica in Italia, Produzione. -- http://www.terna.it/it-it/sistemaelettrico/statisticheeprevisioni/datistatistici.aspx.
  48. Ministero dell’Ambiente and AT Sogesid (2017). Ministero della Tutela del Mare e del Territorio, Direzione Generale per lo sviluppo sostenibile, per il danno ambientale e per i rapporti con l’Unione europea e gli organismi internazionali (SVI) – Unità di Assistenza Tecnica Sogesid SpA, Catalogo dei sussidi ambientalmente favorevoli e ambientalmente dannosi, dicembre 2016. -- http://www.minambiente.it/pagina/catalogo-dei-sussidiambientalmente-dannosi-e-dei-sussidi-ambientalmente-favorevoli.

  • From production to consumption: An inter-sectoral analysis of air emissions external costs in Italy Andrea Molocchi, in ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT 2/2021 pp.155
    DOI: 10.3280/EFE2020-002007

Andrea Molocchi, Emanuela Recchini, Angelica Tudini, Polluter Pays Principle in power production to gradually phase-out fossil fuels in Italy in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2019, pp 203-228, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2019-001013