What Makes Business Intelligence & Analytics Systems Stick? Identifying Recurrent Enablers in Management Accounting Practices

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Walter Lasca, Marco Montemari
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 133-156 Dimensione file 325 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2025-002007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Despite the growing interest in Business Intelligence & Analytics (BI&A) systems, many organizations still struggle to fully embed these tools into their Management Accounting (MA) practices after initial adoption. Yet, limited attention has been devoted to the stage of actual use, and prior studies have mostly examined individual enablers of use in isolation. This paper addresses this gap by investigating which bundle of enabling factors most frequently recur across organizations that have integrated BI&A systems into their MA practices. Drawing on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) as a conceptual lens, the study is based on a cross-sectional field study involving eight Italian medium-sized and large companies. The findings reveal that BI&A system usage in MA contexts emerges not from isolated drivers, but from combinations of factors spanning organizational, technical, and behavioural dimensions. In particular, six enabling factors emerged as consistently present: (1) perceived usefulness of the BI&A system by end users, (2) strong understanding of company processes by management accountants, (3) collaborative implementation involving end users, (4) active management support, (5) cross-functional implementation teams, (6) demand-driven development of BI&A outputs. In addition, the study identifies the choice of the entry point, specifically the decision to start implementation with sales data, as a novel and underexplored enabler. Sales data, being highly accessible, easy to validate, and directly relevant to decision-making, played a crucial role in building early user trust and reducing perceived complexity. This trusted entry point contributed to lower resistance and foster confidence, allowing users to perceive the BI&A system as immediately useful and manageable.

Parole chiave:Management Accounting, Business Intelligence & Analytics, Use, Enablers.

  1. Ahrens, T., Chapman, C.S. (2006), Doing qualitative field research in management accounting: Positioning data to contribute to theory, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(8), pp. 819-844.
  2. Ain, N., Vaia, G., DeLone, W.H., Waheed, M. (2019), Two decades of research on business intelligence system adoption, utilization and success - A systematic literature review, Decision Support Systems, 125, 113113.
  3. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., Yan, Z. (2017), Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, pp. 29-44.
  4. Arkhipova, D., Montemari, M., Mio, C., Marasca, S. (2024), Digital technologies and the evolution of the management accounting profession: A grounded theory literature review, Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(7), pp. 35-64.
  5. Audzeyeva, A., Hudson, R. (2016), How to get the most from a business intelligence application during the post implementation phase? Deep structure transformation at a U.K. retail bank, European Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), pp. 29-46.
  6. Ayress, L. (2008), Thematic coding and analysis. In Given L.M. (ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, pp. 868-869, Los Angeles, Sage Publications.
  7. Badia, F., Donato, F. (2022), Opportunities and risks in using big data to support management control systems: A multiple case study, Management Control, 3, pp. 39-63.
  8. Bhimani, A., Willcocks, L. (2014), Digitisation, ‘Big Data’ and the transformation of accounting information, Accounting and Business Research, 44(4), pp. 469-490.
  9. Borthwick, A., Hansen, R. (2017), Digital literacy in teacher education: Are teacher educators competent?, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(2), pp. 46-48.
  10. Brockmann, T., Stieglitz, S., Kmieciak, J., Diederich, S. (2012), User acceptance of mobile Business Intelligence services, 15th International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 861-866.
  11. Bronzo, M., de Resende, P.T.V., de Oliveira, M.P.V., McCormack, K.P., de Sousa, P.R., Ferreira, R.L. (2013), Improving performance aligning business analytics with process orientation, International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), pp. 300-307.
  12. Burton-Jones, A., Grange, C. (2013), From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective, Information Systems Research, 24(3), pp. 632-658.
  13. Burton-Jones, A., Straub, D.W. (2006), Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test, Information Systems Research, 17(3), pp. 228-246.
  14. Castellano, N., Presti, C., Gobbo, R. (2017), Employing big data & analytics in decision-making: Factors affecting managers’ trustworthiness, In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information Systems Management, ECISM 2017, pp. 37-46.
  15. Chi, T.W., Mahmud, I. (2020), Business intelligence system adoption: A systematic literature review of two decades, International Journal of Industrial Management, 6, pp. 1-8.
  16. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (2014), Basics of qualitative research, San Jose, Sage Publications.
  17. Cupertino, S., Vitale, G., Riccaboni, A. (2018), L’impatto dei Big Data sulle attività di pianificazione & controllo aziendali: Un caso di studio di una PMI agricola italiana, Management Control, 3, pp. 59-86.
  18. Davenport, T., Harris, J. G., Morison, R. (2010), Analytics at work: Smarter decisions, better results, Boston, Harvard Business Press.
  19. Davenport, T. (2006), Competing on Analytics, Harvard Business Review, 84(1), pp. 98-107.
  20. Davis, F. (1989), Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 319-340.
  21. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (1992), Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research, 3(1), pp. 60-95.
  22. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R. (2003), The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update, Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), pp. 9-30.
  23. Deng, X., Chi, L. (2012), Understanding postadoptive behaviors in information systems use: A longitudinal analysis of systems use problems in the Business Intelligence context, Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(3), pp. 291-326.
  24. Dilla, W., Janvrin, D., Jeffrey, C. (2013), The impact of graphical displays of pro forma earnings information on professional and nonprofessional investors’ earnings judgments, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), pp. 37-60.
  25. Dunne, T., Heliar, C., Lymer, A., Mousa, R. (2013), Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK, The British Accounting Review, 45(3), pp. 167-182.
  26. Elbashir, M.Z., Collier, P.A., Sutton, S.G., Davern, M.J., Leech, S.A. (2013), enhancing the business value of Business Intelligence: The role of shared knowledge and assimilation, Journal of Information Systems, 27(2), pp. 87-105.
  27. Eldenburg, L., Soderstrom, N., Willis, V., Wu, A. (2010), Behavioral changes following the collaborative development of an accounting information system, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), pp. 222-237.
  28. Fahlevi, H., Irsyadillah, I., Indriani, M., Oktari, R. (2021), DRG-based payment system and management accounting changes in an Indonesian public hospital: Exploring potential roles of big data analytics, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(2), pp. 325-345.
  29. Goodhue, D., Thompson, R.L. (1995), Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 213-236.
  30. Granlund, M., Malmi, T. (2002), Moderate impact of ERPs on management accounting: A lag or permanent outcome?, Management Accounting Research, 13(3), pp. 299-321.
  31. Grublješic, T., Coelho, P.S., Jaklic, J. (2014), The importance and impact of determinants influencing Business Intelligence systems embeddedness, Issues in Information Systems, 15(1), pp. 106-217.
  32. Heinzelmann, R. (2017), Occupational identities of management accountants: The role of the IT system, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(4), pp. 465-482.
  33. Hou, C.K. (2012), Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with Business Intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry, International Journal of Information Management, 32(6), pp. 560-573.
  34. Hou, C.K. (2014), Exploring the user acceptance of Business Intelligence systems in Taiwan’s electronics industry: Applying the UTAUT model, International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, 8(3), pp. 195-226.
  35. Hou, C.K. (2015), Understanding Business Intelligence system continuance intention: An empirical study of Taiwan’s electronics industry, Information Development, 32(5), pp. 1359-1371.
  36. Jaklic, J., Grublješic, T., Popovic, A. (2018), The role of compatibility in predicting Business Intelligence and Analytics use intentions, International Journal of Information Management, 43, pp. 305-318.
  37. Kee-Luen, W., Hong-Leong, J., Shwu-Shing, N., Mini-Hooi, C. (2018), Insights from the CGMA Data Competencies Model: The role of data culture to the value creation process, Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(2-4), pp. 187-192.
  38. Knudsen, D.R. (2020), Elusive boundaries, power relations, and knowledge production: A systematic review of the literature on digitalization in accounting, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, 100441.
  39. Kowalczyk, M., Buxmann, P. (2015), An ambidextrous perspective on business intelligence and analytics support in decision processes: Insights from a multiple case study, Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 75107, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  40. Krippendorff, K. (1980), Content analysis an introduction to its methodology, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
  41. Lautenbach, P., Johnston, K., Adeniran-Ogundipe, T. (2017), Factors influencing Business Intelligence and Analytics usage extent in South African organisations, South Africa Journal of Business Management, 48(3), pp. 23-33.
  42. Lillis, A.M., Mundy, J. (2005), Cross-sectional field studies in management accounting research - Closing the gaps between surveys and case studies, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 17(1), pp. 119-141.
  43. Lombardi, R., Trequattrini, R., Schimperna, F., Cano-Rubio, M. (2021), The impact of smart technologies on management and strategic control: A structured literature review, Management Control, Special Issue 1, pp. 11-30.
  44. Lynch, T., Gregor, S. (2004), User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes, European Journal of Information Systems, 13(4), pp. 286-301.
  45. Maroufkhani, P., Tseng, M.L., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, W K.W., Khalid, H. (2020), Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises, International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102190.
  46. Marx, F., Wortmann, F., Mayer, J., (2012), A maturity model for management control systems: Five evolutionary steps to guide development, Business & Information Systems Engineering, 4(4), pp. 193-207.
  47. Mertins, L., White, L. (2014), Can management accountants influence productivity? The case of production efficiency variances, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 25(3), pp. 43-50.
  48. Mikalef, P., Pappas, I.O., Krogstie, J., Giannakos, M. (2018), Big data analytics capabilities: A systematic literature review and research agenda, Information Systems and E-business Management, 16(3), pp. 547-578.
  49. Munir, S., Rasid, S., Jamil, F., Ahmed, I. (2023), Big data analytics capabilities and innovation effect of dynamic capabilities, organizational culture and role of management accountants, Foresight, 25(1), pp. 41-66.
  50. Nespeca, A., Chiucchi, M.S. (2018), The impact of business intelligence systems on management accounting systems: The consultant’s perspective, In Lamboglia, R., Cardoni, A., Dameri, R., Mancini, D. (eds.), Network, Smart and Open. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 24, pp. 283-297, Cham, Springer.
  51. Nofal, M., Yusof, Z.M. (2016), Conceptual model of Enterprise Resource Planning and Business Intelligence systems usage, International Journal of Business Information Systems, 21(2), pp. 178-193.
  52. Patton, M.Q. (1990), Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
  53. Peng, J., Viator, R., Buchheit, S. (2007), An experimental study of multidimensional hierarchical accounting data, Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), pp. 69-86.
  54. Peters, M., Wieder, B., Sutton, S. (2018), Organizational improvisation and the reduced usefulness of performance measurement BI functionalities, International Journal of Accounting, 29, pp. 1-15.
  55. Petrosino, A., Mancini, D., Garzella, S., Lamboglia, R. (2018), La Business Intelligence e la Business Analytics nell’era dei Big Data: Una analisi della letteratura, Management Control, 3, pp. 31-58.
  56. Popovic, A. (2017), If we implement it, will they come? User resistance in post-acceptance usage behaviour within Business Intelligence systems context, Economic Research - Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), pp. 911-921.
  57. Popovic, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P.S., Jaklic, J. (2012), Towards business intelligence systems success: Effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision making, Decision Support Systems, 54(1), pp. 729-739.
  58. Popovic, A., Hackney, R., Coelho, P.S., Jaklic, J. (2014), How information-sharing values influence the use of information systems: An investigation in the Business Intelligence context, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 23(4), pp. 270-283.
  59. Qu, S., Dumay, J. (2011), The qualitative research interview, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), pp. 238-264.
  60. Rikhardsson, P., Yigitbasioglu, O. (2018), Business Intelligence & Analytics in management accounting research: Status and future focus, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 29, pp. 37-58.
  61. Roslender, R., Hart, S.J. (2003), In search of strategic management accounting: Theoretical and field study perspectives, Management Accounting Research, 14(3), pp. 255-279.
  62. Rubin, H., Rubin, I. (2011), Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
  63. Saga, V.L., Zmud, R.W. (1993), The Nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion, In Levine, L. (ed.), Diffusion, transfer and implementation of information technology, pp. 67-86, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  64. Seow, P.S. (2011), The effects of decision aid structural restrictiveness on decision-making outcomes, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 12(1), pp. 40-56.
  65. Silverman, D. (2013), Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook, London, Sage Publications.
  66. Slade, E.L., Williams, M.D., Dwivedi, Y.K. (2015), Extending UTAUT2 to explore consumer adoption of mobile payments, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), pp. 427-443.
  67. Spraakman, G., Sánchez-Rodríguez, C.A., Tuck-Riggs, C. (2021), Data analytics by management accountants, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 18(1), pp. 127-147.
  68. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003), User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp. 425-478.
  69. Villamarín-García, J., Díaz Pinzón, B. (2017), Key success factors to Business Intelligence solution implementation, Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 7(1), pp. 48-69.
  70. Visani, F., (2017), Applying Business Analytics for performance measurement and management. The case study of a software company, Management Control, 2, pp. 89-123.
  71. Visinescu, L.L., Jones, M.C., Sidorova, A. (2016), Improving decision making quality: The role of Business Intelligence, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 57(1), pp. 58-66.
  72. Wengraf, T. (2001), Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. London, Sage Publications.
  73. Williams, M.D., Rana, N.P., Dwivedi, Y.K. (2015), The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), pp. 443-488

Walter Lasca, Marco Montemari, What Makes Business Intelligence & Analytics Systems Stick? Identifying Recurrent Enablers in Management Accounting Practices in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2/2025, pp 133-156, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2025-002007