ESG performance measures in universities’ strategic plans

Journal title ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Author/s Andrea Garlatti, Paolo Fedele, Silvia Iacuzzi
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1
Language English Pages 38 P. 33-70 File size 191 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2025-001002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Strategic planning has been one of the main pillars of public sector reform, yet it has often focused on a narrow set of concerns and proven unable to capture “what matters” for public sector organizations, such as public universities. This research explores whether current trends towards sustainability practices can contribute to help bring public values back in the strategic objectives of universities, since they lead them to focus on broader social and environmental impacts. The article focuses on the inclusion of environmental, social and governance issues in the strategic plans of 13 Italian public universities. Findings shows that universities mostly incorporate social performance measures, partly disregarding environmental and governance dimensions and that the degree of integration of sustainability measures is mostly influenced by public management policies, mediated by pre-existing arrangements and factors.

Keywords: performance management, public sector, sustainability, higher education.

Jel codes: L32, M14, M41

  1. Adams C.A. (2013). Sustainability reporting and performance management in universities: Challenges and bene?ts. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(3): 384-392. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2012-0044
  2. Adams C.A., Muir S. & Hoque Z. (2014). Measurement of sustainability performance in the public sector. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1): 46-67. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2012-0018
  3. Agasisti T., Barbato G., Dal Molin M. & Turri M. (2019). Internal quality assurance in universities: does NPM matter?. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6): 960-977. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1405252
  4. Ali M., Mustapha I., Osman S. & Hassan U. (2021). University social responsibility: A review of conceptual evolution and its thematic analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124931.
  5. Almqvist R., Grossi G., van Helden G.J. & Reichard C. (2013). Public sector governance and accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(7-8): 479-487.
  6. Argento D., Dobija D. & Grossi G. (2020). The disillusion of calculative practices in academia. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(1): 1-17. DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-12-2019-0130
  7. Arnaboldi M. & Azzone G. (2004). Benchmarking university activities: An Italian case study. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2): 205-220.
  8. Avila L.V., Filho L.W., Brandli L.L., Macgregor C.J., Molthan-Hill P., Ozuyar P.G. & Moreira R.M. (2017). Barriers to innovation and sustainability at universities around the world. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164: 1268-1278.
  9. Ball A. & Bebbington J. (2008). Editorial: accounting and reporting for sustainable development in public sector organizations, Public Money & Management, 28(6): 323-326.
  10. Barzelay M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue, Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
  11. Baumüller J. & Schaffhauser-Linzatti M. (2018). In search of materiality for nonfinancial information—reporting requirements of the Directive 2014/95/EU. Nachhaltigkeits Management Forum, 26: 101-111.
  12. Bebbington J. & Unerman J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1): 2-24. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929
  13. Bice S. % Coates H. (2015). University sustainability reporting: taking stock of transparency. Tertiary Education and Management, 22: 1-18. DOI: 13583883.2015.1115545.
  15. Billio M., Costola M., Hristova I., Latino C. & Pelizzon L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings: (Dis)agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5): 1426-1445.
  16. Ongaro E. (2011). The role of politics and institutions in the Italian administrative reform trajectory. Public Administration, 89(3): 738-755.
  17. Biondi L. & Russo S. (2022). Integrating strategic planning and performance management in universities: a multiple case-study analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 26: 417-448.
  18. Bouckaert G. & Halligan J. (2008). Comparing Performance across Public Sectors. In: Van Dooren W., Van de Walle S., Performance Information in the Public Sector. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 72-93.
  19. Bracci E., Saliterer I., Sicilia M. & Steccolini I. (2021). Accounting for (public) value (s): Reconsidering publicness in accounting research and practice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(7): 1513-1526. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2021-5318
  20. Brusca I., Labrador M. & Larran M. (2018). The challenge of sustainability and integrated reporting at universities: a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188: 347-354.
  21. Bryson J.M., Crosby B.C. & Bloomberg L. (2014). Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74: 445-456.
  22. Burgman R. & Roos G. (2004). Measuring, managing and delivering value performance in the public sector, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 1(2): 132-149. DOI: 10.1504/IJLIC.2004.005068
  23. Burritt R.L. & Schaltegger S. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: fad or trend? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7): 829-846. DOI: 10.1108/09513571011080144
  24. Cappucci M. (2018). The ESG Integration Paradox. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 30: 22-28.
  25. Christensen T., Lægreid P. & Røvik K.A. (2007). Organization Theory and the Public Sector: Instrument, Culture and Myth. London: Routledge.
  26. Cordery C.J. & Hay D.C. (2022). Public sector audit in uncertain times. Financial Accountability & Management, 38: 426-446.
  27. Costa A., Tafuro A., Benvenuto M. & Viola C. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility through SDGs: preliminary results from a pilot study in Italian universities. Administrative Sciences, 11: 117.
  28. Craig R., Amernic J. & Tourish D. (2014). Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1): 1-24.
  29. De La Poza E., Merello P., Barberá A. & Celani A. (2021). Universities’ reporting on SDGs: using THE Impact Rankings to model and measure their contribution to sustainability. Sustainability, 13(2038): 1-28.
  30. De Iorio S., Zampone G. & Piccolo A. (2022). Determinant Factors of SDG. Disclosure in the University Context. Administrative Sciences, 12: 21.
  31. De Villiers C. & Alexander D. (2014). The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The British Accounting Review, 46(2): 198-212.
  32. De Waele L., Polzer T., van Witteloostuijn A. & Berghman L. (2021). A little bit of everything? Conceptualising performance measurement in hybrid public sector organisations through a literature review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(3): 343-363. DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2020-0075.
  33. Deegan C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures - A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3): 282-311. DOI: 10.1108/09513570210435852
  34. DiMaggio P.J. & Powell W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
  35. Directive 2014/95/EU – also called Non-financial reporting directive (NFRD). Brussels: European Commission.
  36. Dorfleitner G., Halbritter G. & Nguyen M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility. An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16: 450-466.
  37. Dumay J., Farneti F. & Guthrie J. (2010): GRI sustainability reporting guidelines for public and third sector organizations: a critical review. Public Management Review, 12(4): 531-548. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2010.496266
  38. Dziminska M., Fijalkowska J. & Sulkowski L. (2020). A conceptual model proposal: universities as culture change agents for sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(11): 4635, 1-23.
  39. Egeberg M. (2003). How bureaucratic structure matters: an organizational perspective. In: Peters B.G., Pierre J., Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  40. Filho L.W., Shiel C., Paço A., Mifsud M., Ávila L.V., Londero Brandli L., Molthan-Hill P., Pace P., Azeiteiro U.M., Ruiz Vargas V. & Caeiro S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232: 285-294.
  41. Fischer D., Jenssen S. & Tappeser V. (2015). Getting an empirical hold of the sustainable university: a comparative analysis of evaluation frameworks across 12 contemporary sustainability assessment tools. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(6): 785-800. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1043234
  42. Fissi S., Romolini A., Gori E. & Contri M. (2021). The path toward a sustainable green university: The case of the University of Florence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123655.
  43. Galleli B., Teles N.E.B., Santos J.A.R.d., Freitas-Martins M.S. & Hourneaux Junior F. (2022). Sustainability university rankings: a comparative analysis of UI green metric and the Times Higher Education world university rankings. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(2): 404-425. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-12-2020-0475
  44. Gebreiter F. & Hidayah N. N. (2019). Individual responses to competing accountability pressures in hybrid organizations: The case of an English business school. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(3): 727-749. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3098
  45. Grossi G., Dobija D. & Strzelczyk W. (2020a), “The impact of competing institutional pressures and logics on the use of performance measurement in hybrid universities. Public Performance & Management Review, 43(4): 818-844. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2019.1684328
  46. Grossi G., Kallio K.-M., Sargiacomo M. & Skoog M. (2020b). Accounting, performance management systems and accountability changes in knowledge-intensive public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(1): 256-280. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2019-3869
  47. Grossi G., Reichard C., Thomasson A. & Vakkuri J. (2017). Editorial. Public Money & Management, 37(6): 379-386. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1344007
  48. Grossi G., Steccolini I., Adhikari P., Brown J., Christensen M., Cordery C., Ferry L., Lassou P., McDonald III B., Raudla R., Sicilia M. & Vinnari E. (2023). The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 20(1): 1-37. DOI: 10.1108/QRAM-09-2022-0135
  49. Guthrie J. & Neumann R. (2007). Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities: the establishment of a performance-driven system for Australian higher education. Public Management Review, 9(2): 231-252. DOI: 10.1080/14719030701340390
  50. Guthrie J., Domingues A.R., Manes-Rossi R. & Orelli R.L. (2020). Integrated Reporting and Sustainable Development Goals in universities. In De Villiers C., Hsiao P.-C.K., Maroun W., The Routledge Handbook of Integrated Reporting, London: Routledge, 419-439.
  51. Hestad D., Tàbara J.D. & Thornton T.F. (2021). The three logics of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations: a multi-disciplinary review. Sustainability Science, 16: 647-661.
  52. Hood C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69: 3-19.
  53. Hood C. & Peters B.G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3): 267-282.
  54. Hsieh H.F. & Shannon S.E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9): 1277-1288. DOI: 1049732305276687.
  55. Jacobs K. & Cuganesan S. (2014). Interdisciplinary accounting research in the public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 27(8): 1250-1256. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1732
  56. Jones D.R. (2017). Opening up the Pandora’s box of sustainability league tables of universities: a Kafkaesque perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3): 480-503. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1052737
  57. Jongbloed B. (2015). Universities as Hybrid Organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 45(3): 207-225. DOI: 10.1080/00208825.2015.1006027
  58. Kaplan R.S. & Norton D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
  59. Krasodomska J. & Zarzycka E. (2021). Key performance indicators disclosure in the context of the EU directive: when does stakeholder pressure matter?. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(7): 1-30. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-05-2020-0876
  60. Krippendorff K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  61. Kubra Canhilal S., Lepori B. & Seeber M. (2016). Decision-making power and institutional logic in higher education institutions: A comparative analysis of European Universities. In: R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, F.O. Ramirez, K. Vrangbæk, Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Vol.45. Towards a comparative institutionalism: Forms, dynamics and logics across the organizational fields of health care and higher education. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 169-194.
  62. Lapsley I. & Miller P. (2004). Transforming universities: the uncertain, erratic path. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(2): 103-106.
  63. Larrán J.M., Madueno J.H. & Andrades Peña F.J. (2015). Factors in?uencing the presence of sustainability initiatives in the strategic planning of Spanish universities. Environmental Education Research, 21: 1155-1187. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2014.977231
  64. Lauder A., Sari R.F. Suwartha N. & Tjahjono G. (2015). Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 852-863.
  65. Lee K.-H., Barker M. & Mouasher A. (2013). Is it even espoused? An exploratory study of commitment to sustainability as evidenced in vision, mission, and graduate attribute statements in Australian universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48: 20-28.
  66. Locke E.A. & Latham G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  67. Lombardi R., Massaro M., Dumay J. & Nappo F. (2019). Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: the case of the University of Bari. Management Decision, 57(12): 3387-3405. DOI: 10.1108/MD-06-2018-0690
  68. Lozano R., Ceulemans K., Alonso-Almeida M., Huisingh D., Lozano F.J., Waas T., Lambrechtsh W., Lukman R. & Huge J. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108: 1-18.
  69. Mackintosh M., Jarvis R. & Heery E. (1994). On managing hybrids: some dilemmas in higher education management. Financial Accountability & Management, 10(4): 339-353.
  70. Manes Rossi F., Mussari R. & Cepiku D. (2022). Introduction to the special issue: ‘Performance measurement systems in universities: Threats or opportunities for governance?’. Journal of Management and Governance, 26: 327-335.
  71. Manetti G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2): 110-122.
  72. Merchant K. & Van Der Stede W. (2017). Management Control Systems: Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives. London: Pearson.
  73. Meyer M.W. & O’Shaughnessy K. (1993). Organizational design and the performance paradox. In R. Swedberg, Explorations in economic sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 249-278.
  74. Meynhardt T. (2009). Public value inside: what is public value creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3-4): 192-219. DOI: 10.1080/01900690902732632
  75. Meynhardt T. (2021). Public value is knowable, public value creation is not. Administration & Society, 53(10): 1631-1642. DOI: 10.1177/00953997211053500
  76. Mintzberg H. & Quinn J.B. (1996). The Strategy Process: Concepts, Contexts, Cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  77. Mitchell R., Agle B. & Wood D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22: 853-886. DOI: 10.2307/259247
  78. Modell S. (2005). Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(4): 537-563. DOI: 10.1108/09513570510609351
  79. Modell S. (2022). New developments in institutional research on performance measurement and management in the public sector. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(3): 353-369. . DOI: DOI 10.1108/JPBAFM-04-2021-0070
  80. Moggi S. (2019). Social and environmental reports at universities: A Habermasian view on their evolution. Accounting Forum, 43: 283-326. DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2019.1579293
  81. Moggi S. (2023). Sustainability reporting, universities and global reporting initiative applicability: a still open issue. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(4): 699-742. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2022-0257
  82. Moore M.H. (2014). Public value accounting: establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4): 465-477.
  83. Mori Junior R., Fien J. & Horne R. (2019), Implementing the UN SDGs in universities: challenges, opportunities and lessons learned. Sustainability – The Journal of Record, 12(2): 129-133.
  84. Moulton S. (2009). Putting together the publicness puzzle: a framework for realized publicness. Public Administration Review, 69(5): 889-900.
  85. Nardo M.T., Codreanu G.C. & Roberto F. (2021). Universities’ social responsibility through the lens of strategic planning: a content analysis. Administrative Sciences, 11(4), 139.
  86. Nicolò G., Zanellato G. & Tiron-Tudor A. (2020). Integrated Reporting and European State-Owned Enterprises: a disclosure analysis pre and post 2014/95/EU. Sustainability, 12(5): 1908.
  87. Osborne S.P. (2018). From public service-dominant logic to public service logic: are public service organizations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review, 20(2): pp.225-231. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461
  88. Parker L.D. (2011). University corporatization: driving redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(4): 434-450.
  89. Parker L.D. (2013). Contemporary university strategising: The financial imperative. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1): 1-25.
  90. Parker L.D. & Guthrie J. (2012). Accounting scholars and journals rating and benchmarking: risking academic research quality. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1): 4-15. DOI: 10.1108/09513571311293028
  91. Painter M. & Peters G.B. (2010). The analysis of administrative tradition. In Painter M. & Peters G.B., Tradition and Public Administration, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-16.
  92. Peters B.G. (2008). The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2): 118-132. DOI: 10.1108/09513550810855627
  93. Peters B.G. (2011). Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London and New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
  94. Pollitt C. & Bouckaert G. (2017). Public management reform: a comparative analysis – into the age of austerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  95. Porter M., Serafeim G. & Kramer M. (2019). Where ESG fails, Institutional Investor, 16(2), available online at: https://sharedvalue.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Where-ESG-Fails-_-Institutional-Investor.pdf.
  96. Purcell W.M., Henriksen H. & Spengler J.D. (2019). Universities as the engine of transformational sustainability toward delivering the sustainable development goals: “Living labs” for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8): 1343-1357. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-02-2019-0103
  97. Ralph M. & Stubbs W. (2014). Integrating environmental sustainability into universities. Higher Education, 67: 71-90.
  98. Rosen M.A. (2020). “Do universities contribute to sustainable development? European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 4(2): 1-3.
  99. Sales de Aguiar T.R. & Paterson A.S. (2018). Sustainability on campus: knowledge creation through social and environmental reporting. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11): 1882-1894. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2017.1289506
  100. Secundo G., Del Vecchio P., Schiuma G. & Passiante G. (2017) Activating entrepreneurial learning processes for transforming university students’ idea into entrepreneurial practices. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(3): 465-485. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0315
  101. Steccolini I. (2019). Accounting and the post-new public management: Re-considering publicness in accounting research”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(1): 255-279. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3423
  102. Steinmo S. (2008). Historical institutionalism In Della Porta D., Keating M., Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 118-138.
  103. Stough T., Ceulemans K., Lambrechts W. & Cappuyns V. (2018). Assessing sustainability in higher education curricula: a critical re?ection on validity issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 4456-4466.
  104. Tricks H. (2020). In need of a clean-up. In The Economist, Special report: ESG investing, a broken system needs urgent repairs, weekly edition 23 July 2020, London, UK, pp. 3-4.
  105. Torelli R., Balluchi F. & Furlotti K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: a content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2): 470-484.
  106. Tsang A., Frost T. & Cao H. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. The British Accounting Review, 55(1): 101149.
  107. Van Thiel S. & Leeuw F.L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3): 267-281. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661
  108. Vollmer H. (2021). Public value and the planet: accounting in ecological reconstitution. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(7): 1527-1554. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4283

Andrea Garlatti, Paolo Fedele, Silvia Iacuzzi, ESG performance measures in universities’ strategic plans in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 1/2025, pp 33-70, DOI: 10.3280/EP2025-001002