To buy or to rent? An experimental study on the antecedents of consumers’ acquisition-mode decisions

Titolo Rivista MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ
Autori/Curatori Marco Pichierri, Daniele Scarpi, Gabriele Pizzi
Anno di pubblicazione 2018 Fascicolo 2018/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 28 P. 63-92 Dimensione file 2596 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2018-001005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Renting is a widely used mode of gaining access to goods, yet research on how consumers decide whether to buy or rent a good is still limited, leaving unclear whether a buy-or-rent choice is driven by situational (i.e., context-related) or dispositional (i.e., personality-related) factors. This research jointly addresses the role of situational and dispositional factors on the rent-or-buy decision, to shed light on what actually drives consumers’ preference for one or the other acquisition mode. Results of an experimental study, conducted using a real-life choice situation involving a leading automotive brand, show that overall consumers strongly prefer buying to renting, regardless of the quality of the alternatives they are evaluating. This evidence challenges the commonly held idea that through rental consumers can enjoy superior-quality goods that they could otherwise not afford. Furthermore, results show that specific situational (time horizon) and dispositional (importance of possession, locus of control, convenience orientation) factors may affect individuals’ intention to buy or rent. Theoretical and managerial implications are also discussed.;

Keywords:Acquisition mode, time horizon, possession importance, convenience orientation, locus of control.

  1. Bardhi F., Eckhardt G.M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4): 881-898. DOI: 10.1086/666376
  2. Baumeister C., Wangenheim F.V. (2014). Access vs. ownership: Understanding consumers’ consumption mode preference. -- Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463076.
  3. Bearden W.O., Money R.B., Nevins J.L. (2006). A measure of long-term orientation: Development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3): 456-467. DOI: 10.1177/0092070306286706
  4. Behrendt S., Jasch C., Kortman J., Hrauda G., Pfitzner R., Velte D. (2017). Ecoservice development: Reinventing supply and demand in the European Union. Routledge.
  5. Belk R.W. (1985). Materialism: Trait aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3): 265-280. DOI: 10.1086/208515
  6. Belk R.W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2): 139-168. DOI: 10.1086/209154
  7. Belk R. (2010). Sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 715-734.
  8. Belk R.W. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative
  9. consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1595-1600. DOI: 10.1086/209154
  10. Bennett R., Kottasz R. (2013). Attractiveness of limited edition artwork for firstgeneration newly affluent consumers. International Journal of Arts Management, 15(3): 21-38.
  11. Brehm J. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
  12. Brehm S., Brehm J. (1981). Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.
  13. Burns D.J., Warren H.B. (1995). Need for uniqueness: shopping mall preference and choice activity. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 23(12): 4-12. DOI: 10.1108/09590559510103954
  14. Chen Y. (2008). Possession and access: Consumer desires and value perceptions regarding contemporary art collection and exhibit visits. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 925-940. DOI: 10.1086/593699
  15. Csikszentmihalyi M., Halton E. (1981). The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.
  16. Durgee J. F., Colarelli O’Connor G. (1995). An exploration into renting as consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 12(2): 89-104.
  17. Edwards S., Li H. Lee J.-H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3): 83-95. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2002.10673678
  18. Ford Media (2016). Ford Europe sales rise 11.5% in May; best May car sales since 2011 and best commercial vehicle sales since 2007. -- Retrieved May 18, 2017, from: https://media.ford.com/content/dam/fordmedia/Europe/en/2016/06/Ford%20Europe%20Sales%20May.pdf.
  19. Furby L. (1978). Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 6(1): 49-65.
  20. Gatersleben B. (2011). The car as a material possession: Exploring the link between materialism and car ownership and use. In: Lucas K., Blumenberg E., & Weinberger R. (Eds.). Auto Motives. Emerald, 137-148.
  21. Hassan L.M., Shiu E., Walsh G. (2011). A multi-country assessment of the longterm orientation scale. International Marketing Review, 28(1): 81-101. DOI: 10.1108/02651331111107116
  22. Hofstede G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organization across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  23. Hong S.M., Faedda S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1): 173-182. DOI: 10.1177/0013164496056001014
  24. Hunt J. M., Kernan J. B., Chatterjee A., & Florsheim R. A. (1990). Locus of control as a personality correlate of materialism: An empirical note. Psychological Reports, 67(3_suppl): 1101-1102.
  25. Lastovicka J.L., Bettencourt L.A., Hughner R.S., Kuntze R.J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1): 85-98. DOI: 10.1086/209552
  26. Lawson S.J., Gleim M.R., Perren R., Hwang J. (2016). Freedom from ownership: An exploration of access-based consumption. Journal of Business Research, 69(8): 2615-2623.
  27. Lefcourt H.M. (1991). Locus of control. In: Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R. and Wrightsman L.S. (Eds.). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press, 413-499.
  28. Liberman N., Trope Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1): 5-18. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.5
  29. Lovelock C., Gummesson E. (2004). Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1): 20-41. DOI: 10.1177/1094670504266131
  30. Mobley A.S., Painter T.S., Untch E.M., Unnava H.R. (1995). Consumer evaluation of recycled products. Psychology & Marketing, 12(3): 165-176.
  31. Moeller S., Wittkowski K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: Reasons for preferring renting. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(2): 176-191. DOI: 10.1108/09604521011027598
  32. Moore A., Taylor M. (2009). Why buy when you can rent? A brief investigation of differences in acquisition mode based on duration. Applied Economics Letters, 16(12): 1211-1213. DOI: 10.1080/13504850701367304
  33. O’Cass A., McEwen H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1): 25-39.
  34. Pocheptsova A., Kivetz R., Dhar R. (2008). Consumer decisions to rent vs. buy. In: Lee A.I. and Soman D. (Eds.). NA – Advances in Consumer Research Volume 35. Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
  35. Read D., Read N.L. (2004). Time discounting over the lifespan. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(1): 22-32.
  36. Richins M.L. (1994). Special possessions and the expression of material values.
  37. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3): 522-533. DOI: 10.1086/209415
  38. Rotter J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1): 1-28.
  39. Ruvio A. (2008). Unique like everybody else? The dual role of consumers’ need for uniqueness. Psychology & Marketing, 25(5): 444-464.
  40. Ruvio A., Shoham A., Makovec Brenˇciˇc M. (2008). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: short-form scale development and cross-cultural validation. International Marketing Review, 25(1): 33-53. DOI: 10.1108/02651330810851872
  41. Samuelson P.A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2): 155-161. DOI: 10.2307/2967612
  42. Sapp S.G., Harrod W.J. (1993). Reliability and validity of a brief version of Levenson’s locus of control scale. Psychological Reports, 72(2): 539-550.
  43. Scarpi D., Pizzi G. (2013). The impact of phantom decoys on choices and perceptions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(5): 451-461.
  44. Schaefers T., Lawson S.J., Kukar-Kinney M. (2016). How the burdens of ownership promote consumer usage of access-based services. Marketing Letters, 27(3): 569-577.
  45. Scholl G. (2006). Exploring the symbolic meaning of usership. Ökologisches Wirtschaften-Fachzeitschrift, 21(2): 30-32.
  46. Seiders K., Voss G.B., Grewal D., Godfrey A.L. (2005). Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. Journal of Marketing, 69(4): 26-43.
  47. Snyder C.R. (1992). Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1): 9-24.
  48. Snyder C.R., Fromkin H.L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York: Plenum Press.
  49. Soman D., Ainslie G., Frederick S., Li X., Lynch J., Moreau P., Mitchell A., Read D, Sawyer A., Trope Y., Wertenbroch K., Zauberman G. (2005). The psychology of intertemporal discounting: Why are distant events valued differently from proximal ones? Marketing Letters, 16(3-4): 347-360.
  50. Tian K.T., McKenzie K. (2001). The long-term predictive validity of consumers’ need for uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3): 171-193.
  51. Tian K.T., Bearden W.O., Hunter G.L. (2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 50-66. DOI: 10.1086/321947
  52. Trocchia P.J., Beatty S.E. (2003). An empirical examination of automobile lease vs finance motivational processes. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(1): 28-43. DOI: 10.1108/07363760310456937
  53. US Census Bureau (2014). Annual service reports–estimated revenue for employer and nonemployer firms. -- Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/services/.
  54. Üstüner T., Thompson C.J. (2010). How marketplace performances produce interdependent status games and contested forms of symbolic capital. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5): 796-814.

Marco Pichierri, Daniele Scarpi, Gabriele Pizzi, To buy or to rent? An experimental study on the antecedents of consumers’ acquisition-mode decisions in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 1/2018, pp 63-92, DOI: 10.3280/MC2018-001005