Reducing asymmetry in doctor-patient interaction: patients’ initiatives in specialised clinical encounters

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Piera Margutti, Renata Galatolo
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/1EN
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 18 P. 23-40 Dimensione file 369 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2013-001003EN
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study identifies a specific multimodal practice that patients use during medical encounters with a team of doctor in an Italian specialized centre for prosthesis construction and application. Focusing on the early stages of these encounters, the paper analyses the way in which patients delicately orchestrate their gaze, gesture and verbal behaviour to gain some extra speaking space, beyond that of mere respondents to doctors’ questions. By using Conversation Analysis, we show that patients produce this recurrent multimodal pattern, in methodically produced and recognizable ways. Patients manage to acquire the interactional role of "action initiators"; thus constraining doctors to respond: for instance, by producing unrequested information about their health status, by correcting implicit assumptions in the doctors’ questions, or by producing independent assessments. The paper contributes to previous research on patients’ agency and initiative, revising the notion of asymmetry in medical settings and highlighting the active role of the patient in every stage of these encounters.

Keywords:Patient initiative, asymmetry, mitigation, multimodality, medical interaction, specialized medical encounters

  1. Atkinson J. M. and Heritage J., editors (1984). Structures of Social Actions: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  2. Boyd E., Heritage J. (2006). Taking the Patient's Medical History: Questioning During Comprehensive History Taking. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D. editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511607172.008
  3. Brown P., Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Brown P., Levinson S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Caffi C. (2001). La mitigazione. Un approccio pragmatico alla comunicazione nei contesti terapeutici. Münster: LIT Verlag
  6. Costello B. A., Roberts F. (2001). Medical Recommendations as Joint Social Practice. Health Communication 13, 3: 241-260 DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1303_2
  7. Drew P. and Heritage J. editors (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (Studies in Interactional Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  8. Gili Fivela B. e Bazzanella C., editors (2009). Fenomeni di intensità nell’italiano parlato. Firenze: Franco Cesati Editore
  9. Gill V. (1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients' explanations for illness and doctors' responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 4: 342
  10. Gill V., Maynard D. (2006). Patients' Explanations for Health problems and physicians' Responsiveness in the Medical Interview. In: Heritage J. and Maynard D., editors, Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Have ten P. (1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the ``asymmetry'' of doctor-patient interaction. In: Boden D. and Zimmerman D. H., editors, Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
  12. Lindström A., Mondada L., editors (2009). Assessments in Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 4: 299-308 DOI: 10.1080/08351810903296457
  13. Pomerantz A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: Atkinson J. M. and Heritage J., editors, Structures of Social Actions: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  14. Robinson J. D. (2001). Asymmetry in action: Sequential resources in the negotiation of a prescription request. Text, 2, 1/2: 19-54 DOI: 10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.19

  • Talking Down Pain in the Prosthesis Clinic: The Emergence of a Local Preference Renata Galatolo, Alessandra Fasulo, in Research on Language and Social Interaction /2022 pp.101
    DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2022.2026172

Piera Margutti, Renata Galatolo, Reducing asymmetry in doctor-patient interaction: patients’ initiatives in specialised clinical encounters in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1EN/2013, pp 23-40, DOI: 10.3280/SES2013-001003EN