Factors influencing the use of non-timber forest products in cattle production under humid tropical conditions

Titolo Rivista Economia agro-alimentare
Autori/Curatori Victor Julio Balanta Martínez, Gustavo Adolfo Celis Parra, Marisol Gonzáles Muñoz , Jhoyner Felipe Ortiz Meneses
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2022/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 15 P. 1-15 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ecag2022oa12566
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

As more attention is paid to the integral management and the problems of cattle production systems in the achievement of sustainable productivity and competitiveness in the territories of the Colombian Amazon region, it is necessary to determine the socioeconomic factors that affect the use of the potential and comparative advantages of productive units located in the region for nutritional supplementation from local inputs, such as Non Timber Forest Products (NTFP). For this purpose, a descriptive-cross-sectional scope with non-experimental design and quantitative approach study was carried out, applying the collection instrument to the sample size defined in a nonprobabilistic way in the municipalities of Albania San Vicente del Caguán, El Doncello, Puerto Rico, and Cartagena del Chaira of the department of Caquetá Colombia. Information was systematized using the R software, where the principal component analysis of the socioeconomic factors with the use of cattle nutrition in the NTFP was carried out. It was found that the factors that have the greatest impact on the use of NTFP are related to the degree of knowledge about NTFP and the strategies for the transfer of scientific knowledge as a complement to the knowledge of the producers.

Parole chiave:; Cattle production; socio-economic factors; NTFP; territory; Sustainable productivity

  1. Alves-Pinto, H.N., Latawiec, A.E., Strassburg, B.B., Barros, F.S., Sansevero, J.B., Iribarrem, A., & Silva, A.C. (2017). Reconciling rural development and ecological restoration: Strategies and policy recommendations for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Land Use Policy, 60, 419-426. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.004
  2. Avendaño, R.B., & Schwentesius, R.R. (2005). Factores de competitividad en la producción y exportación de hortalizas: el caso del valle de Mexicali, B.C., México. Problemas del Desarrollo, 36(140), 165-192.
  3. Bawa, K.S., Joseph, G., & Setty, S. (2007). Poverty, biodiversity and institutions in forest-agriculture ecotones in the Western Ghats and Eastern Himalaya ranges of India, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121(3), 287-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.023
  4. Comité Departamental de Ganaderos del Caquetá (2020). Cifras de Contexto Ganadero Caquetá 2020. -- https://issuu.com/rafaeltorrijos/docs/contexto_ganadero_caqueta_2020.
  5. Dash, M., Behera, B., & Rahut, D.B. (2016). Determinants of household collection of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) and alternative livelihood activities in Similipal Tiger Reserve, India. Forest Policy and Economics, 73, 215-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.09.012
  6. FAO (2014). El estado de los bosques del mundo. Potenciar los beneficios socioeconómicos de los bosques. 1 ed. Roma (Italia), pp. 20-49.
  7. Fonseca, C.J.A., Muñóz, P.N.A., & Cleves, L.J.A. (2011). El sistema de gestión de calidad: elemento para la competitividad y la sostenibilidad de la producción agropecuaria colombiana. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental, 2(1), 9-22. DOI: 10.22490/21456453.909
  8. Gupta, D., Lele, S., & Sahu, G. (2020). Promoting a responsive state: The role of NGOs in decentralized forest governance in India. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102066. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102066
  9. Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Torres, C.P.M. (2018). Metodología de la investigación (Vol. 4). México^ eD. F DF: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
  10. Heubach, K., Wittig, R., Nuppenau, E.-A., & Hahn, K. (2011). The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: A case study from northern Benin. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1991-2001. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.015
  11. Hogarth, N.J., Belcher, B., Campbell, B., & Stacey, N. (2013). The Role of Forest-Related Income in Household Economies and Rural Livelihoods in the Border-Region of Southern China. World Development, 43, 111-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.10.010
  12. Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., & Maintainer, J.M. (2016). Package “FactoMineR.” Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining, 96, 698. -- https://cran.rediris.es/web/packages/FactoMineR/FactoMineR.pdf.
  13. Kar, S.P., & Jacobson, M.G. (2012). NTFP income contribution to household economy and related socio-economic factors: Lessons from Bangladesh. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 136-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.08.003
  14. Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F. (2017). Package ‘factoextra’. Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses, 76. -- https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016-11-30/web/packages/factoextra/factoextra.pdf.
  15. Khosravi, S., Maleknia, R., & Khedrizadeh, M. (2017). Understanding the Contribution of Non-timber Forest Products to the Livelihoods of Forest Dwellers in the Northern Zagros in Iran. Small-scale Forestry, 16, 235-248. DOI: 10.1007/s11842-016-9353-y
  16. Lakerveld, R.P., Lele, S., Crane, T.A., Fortuin, K.P.J., & Springate-Baginski, O. (2015). The social distribution of provisioning forest ecosystem services: Evidence and insights from Odisha, India. Ecosystem Services, 14, 56-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.04.001
  17. Nassl, M., & Löffler, J. (2019). How Societal Values Determine the Local Use of Forest Resources – Findings from the Rural Community Kegong (Northwest Yunnan, China). Sustainability, 11(12), 3447. DOI: 10.3390/su11123447
  18. Osorio, L.F. (2014). Silvopastoreo. Colombia forestal, 17, 73-75.
  19. Pardo, O., Fornaguera, J.E.C., & Hess, H.D. (2008). Efecto de la relación proteína y energía sobre los niveles de amonio ruminal y nitrógeno ureico en sangre y leche de vacas doble propósito del piedemonte llanero, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 21(3), 6.
  20. R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. -- www.r-project.org.
  21. RStudio Team (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. -- www.rstudio.com.
  22. SMBYC, IDEAM (2018). Sistema de Monitoreo de bosques y carbono -- Recuperado: http://smbyc.ideam.gov.co/MonitoreoBC-WEB/pub/reporteGeoproceso.jsp?id_reporte=7123.
  23. Stellian, R., & Danna-Buitrago, J.P. (2017). Competitividad de los productos agropecuarios colombianos en el marco del tratado de libre comercio con los Estados Unidos: análisis de las ventajas comparativas. Revista Cepal.
  24. Stepakova, N.N., Kiseleva, T.F., Koryakina, N.A., Frolova, N.A., & Reznichenko, Y.Y. (2019). Food forest resources as a component of environmental management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science: Earth and Environmental Science, 315, 052046–. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/315/5/052046
  25. Wei, T., & Simko, V. (2021). R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.90). -- https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot.
  26. Weiss, E., Corradini, & Živojinović (2020). New Values of Non-Wood Forest Products, 11(2), 165. DOI: 10.3390/f11020165

  • Application of Participatory Methods to Explore Changes in Land Use of a Tropical Dry Forest Basin Yhonattan Mendez Nobles, Humberto Avila Rangel, Lina Garcia Corrales, in Economia agro-alimentare 1/2023 pp.139
    DOI: 10.3280/ecag2023oa14572

Victor Julio Balanta Martínez, Gustavo Adolfo Celis Parra, Marisol Gonzáles Muñoz , Jhoyner Felipe Ortiz Meneses, Factors influencing the use of non-timber forest products in cattle production under humid tropical conditions in "Economia agro-alimentare" 3/2022, pp 1-15, DOI: 10.3280/ecag2022oa12566