Two sources for a meta-theoretical framework in psychology

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA
Autori/Curatori Sven Hroar Klempe
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 0 P. Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14455
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper is a commentary to Salvatore and colleagues (this volume) which discusses the foundation of a theoretical framework for psychology as a science. The paper argues that in general there are two fundamental sources for any theoretical frameworks in sciences, specifically philosophy and psychology. The argument is that psychology is historically the discipline that justifies an empirical approach in philosophy, whereas philosophy has traditionally only produced theoretical reasoning. This changed in the early modernity, in which philosophy and psychology became united. This unity produced different combinations of subjectivity and objectivity in philosophical reasoning. This paper presents synesthesia as a gateway to investigate the most rudimentary processing of a sense impression. From this perspective, the result demonstrates that the fundamental arbitrariness that forms intensional concepts is almost unavoidable.

  1. Aristoteles (1998). Om sjælen [On the Soul], Fredriksberg: Det lille forlag.
  2. Byatt, A. S. (2012). Edward Munch: The Ghost of Vampires and Victims, The Guardian 22nd June.
  3. Cohen Kadosh, R., & Terhune D. B. (2012) Redefining Synaesthesia? British Journal of Psychology, 103, 20-23.
  4. Janssen, D. F., & Hubbard T. K. (2021) Psychology: Early print uses of the term by Pier Nicola Castellani (1525) and Gerhard Synellius (1525), History of Psychology, 24(2), 182-187.
  5. Kant, I. (1781/1956). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  6. Klempe, S. H. (2015). A Philosophical vs. a Psychological Perspective on Borders. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 50(1), 77-90.
  7. Klempe, S. H. (2020). Tracing the Emergence of Psychology, 1520-1750. A Sophisticated Intruder to Philosophy. New York: Springer.
  8. Klempe, S. H. (2022). Sound and Reason. Synesthesia as Metacognition. Palgrave: Macmillan.
  9. Luria, A. R. (1987). The Mind of a Mnemonist. A Little Book About a Vast Memory, Transl. By L. Solotaroff, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  10. Mengal, P. (2005). La naissance de la psychologie. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  11. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
  12. Peirce, C. S. (1869/1984). Grounds of validity of the laws of logic. In C. S. Peirce (ed.) (1984). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition, Volume 2, 1867-1871 (pp. 242–272). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  13. Peirce, C.S. (1878a/1986). Doctrine of chances. In C. S. Peirce (ed.) (1986). Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition, Volume 3, 1872–1878 (pp. 276–289). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  14. Peirce, C. S. (1878b/1986). The fixation of belief. In C. S. Peirce (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce. A Chronological Edition, Volume 3, 1872–1878 (pp. 242–257). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  15. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.
  16. Simner, J. (2012). Defining synaesthesia. British Journal of Psychology, 103, 1–15. DOI: 10.1348/000712610X52830
  17. Salvatore, S., Ando’, A., Ruggieri, R. A., Bucci, F., Cordella, B., Freda, M. F., Lombardo, C., Lo Coco, G., Novara, C., Petito, A., Schimmenti, A., Vegni, E., Venuleo, C., Zagaria, A., & Zennaro, A. (2022). Compartmentalization and unity of professional psychology. A road map for the future of the discipline. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1, 7-33.
  18. Saussure, F. de (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Transl. By W. Baskin, New York: Columbia University Press.
  19. Smith, N. K. (1962). A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. New York: Humanities Press.
  20. Vidal, F. (2011). The Sciences of the Soul. The Early Modern Origins of Psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  21. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and Speech. In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (eds.) (1987). The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1. Problems of General Psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum.

Sven Hroar Klempe, Two sources for a meta-theoretical framework in psychology in "RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA" 1/2022, pp , DOI: 10.3280/rpc1-2022oa14455