Powering management control with Business Analytics: An institutional perspective to uncover the enablers of adoption

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Franco Visani, Filippo Boccali
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/1 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 28 P. 93-120 Dimensione file 217 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2025-001-S1005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Despite the widely recognized potential of Business Analytics (BA) in enhancing decision-making and boosting business performance, organizations struggle to extract strategically valuable insights from data. The focus tends to be on data collection, cleansing, and storage, with less attention given to evaluating organizational, human, and cultural factors that can impact the successful adoption and institutionalization of these approaches. In light of this, the present research aims to examine how Business Analytics (BA) is incorporated into decision-making processes and to comprehend the institutional factors that influence their effective implementation. The study applies the theoretical framework developed by terBogt and Scapens (2019) to understand how the general archetype of BA is institutionalised through varied situated rationalities. The study utilizes an action research approach in a case where the company's objective was to determine how BA could assist in forecasting the costs of spare parts and maintenance. The findings show that the institutionalization of BA is linked to the presence of an "institutional entrepreneur" and institutional "conflicts", a deep understanding of the company's performance management model, an institutional environment ready for innovation, and an appropriate internal communication model. This study contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the need for a holistic approach to integrate BA into management control systems, and offers practical recommendations for organizations seeking to leverage BA for performance management.

Parole chiave:Business Analytics, Management Control, Institutional Perspective, Situated Rationalities

  1. Al-Okaily A., Al-Okaily M., & Teoh A. P. (2023), Big data and business analytics: A research agenda for realizing business value. Information & Management, 57(3), pp. 103-237.
  2. Anderson S. W., and Widener S. K. (2007), Doing Quantitative Field Research in Management Accounting, in C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, and M. D. Shields (edited by), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, pp. 319-341. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01012-1
  3. Badia F., & Donato F. (2022), Opportunities and risks in using big data to support management control systems: a multiple case study, Management Control, 3, pp. 39-63.
  4. Bayraktar E., Tatoglu E., Aydiner A. S., & Delen D. (2024), Business analytics adoption and technological intensity: An efficiency analysis, Information Systems Frontiers, 26(4), pp. 1509-1526.
  5. Bititci U., Garengo P., Dörfler V. and Nudurupati S. (2012), Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(3), pp. 305-327.
  6. Burns J. and Scapens R.W. (2000), Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework, Management Accounting Research, 11(1), pp. 3-25.
  7. Burns J., Ezzamel M. and Scapens R.W. (2003), Challenge of Management Accounting Change, London: Elsevier.
  8. Chaudhuri R., Chatterjee S., Vrontis D., & Thrassou A. (2024), Adoption of robust business analytics for product innovation and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational data-driven culture, Annals of Operations Research, 339(3), pp. 1757-1791.
  9. Ciampi F., Demi S., Magrini A., Marzi G., & Papa A. (2021), Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation, Journal of Business Research, 123, pp. 1-13.
  10. Coughlan P., & Coghlan D. (2002), Action research for operations management, International journal of operations & production management, 22(2), pp. 220-240. DOI: 10.1108/01443570210417515
  11. Davenport T. H., and Harris J. G. (2007), Competing on Analytics. The New Science of Winning. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  12. Davenport T. H., Harris J. G., and Morison R. (2010), Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions. Better Results. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
  13. Del Gobbo R. (2023), I Big Data non “parlano da soli”: il ruolo dei modelli nella diffusione degli analytics per il management accounting, Management Control, 1, pp. 5-20.
  14. Denzin N. K., and Lincoln Y. S. (2008). Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
  15. El Malki A., & Touate O. (2024), Exploring human and organizational determinants in business intelligence adoption, Management Research, 12(1), pp. 45-67.
  16. Gummesson E. (2000), Qualitative Methods in Management Research (2nd ed.), Thousand: Sage.
  17. He W., Tian X., Li Y., Akula V., Yan G., and Tao R. (2015), Gaining Competitive Intelligence from Social Media Data, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(9), pp. 1622-1636. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0098
  18. Horani O. M., Khatibi A., Al-Soud A. R., Tham J., & Al-Adwan A. S. (2023), Determining the factors influencing business analytics adoption at organizational level: a systematic literature review, Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(3), 125.
  19. Jönsson S. and Lukka K. (2006), There and back again: doing interventionist research in management accounting, Handbooks of management accounting research, 1, pp.373-397. DOI: 10.1016/S1751-3243(06)01015-7
  20. Klatt T., Schläfke M., and Möller K. (2011), Integrating Business Analytics into Strategic Planning for Better Performance, Journal of Business Strategy, 32. DOI: 10.1108/02756661111180113
  21. Kraus M., Feuerriegel S., & Oztekin A. (2020), Deep learning in business analytics and operations research: Models, applications, and managerial implications, European Journal of Operational Research, 281(2), pp. 628-641.
  22. Loureiro S. M. C., Guerreiro J., & Tussyadiah I. (2021), Artificial intelligence in business: State of the art and future research agenda, Journal of Business Research, 129, pp. 911-926.
  23. Lukka K. (2007), Management accounting change and stability: loosely coupled rules and routines in action, Management Accounting Research, 18(1), pp. 76-101.
  24. Mancini D., Petrosino A., Garzella S., & Lamboglia R. (2018), La Business Intelligence e la Business Analytics nell’era dei Big Data: una analisi della letteratura, Management Control, 3, pp. 31-58.
  25. Maroufkhani P., Iranmanesh M., & Ghobakhloo M. (2023), Determinants of big data analytics adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(1), pp. 278-301.
  26. Oliveira J. and Quinn M. (2015), Interactions of rules and routines: re-thinking rules, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(4), pp. 503-526. DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-11-2013-0095
  27. Parker L. D. (2012), Qualitative Management Accounting Research: Assessing Deliverables and Relevance, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(1), pp. 54-70.
  28. Raffoni A., Visani F., Bartolini M., & Silvi R. (2018), Business performance analytics: exploring the potential for performance management systems, Production Planning & Control, 29(1), pp. 51-67. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1381887
  29. Rana N. P., Chatterjee S., Dwivedi Y. K., & Akter S. (2022), Understanding dark side of artificial intelligence (AI) integrated business analytics: Assessing firm’s operational inefficiency and competitiveness, European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), pp. 364-387. DOI: 10.1080/0960085X.2021.1955628
  30. Reason P., & Bradbury H. (Eds.) (2001), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice, Sage.
  31. Rudko I., Bashirpour Bonab A., Fedele M., & Formisano A. V. (2024), New institutional theory and AI: toward rethinking of artificial intelligence in organizations, Journal of Management History. DOI: 10.1108/JMH-09-2023-0097
  32. Scapens R.W. (1994), Never mind the gap: towards an institutional perspective on management accounting practice, Management Accounting Research, 5(3/4), pp. 301-321.
  33. terBogt H.J. and Scapens R.W. (2019), Institutions, situated rationality and agency in management accounting, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(6), pp. 1801-1825. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-05-2016-2578
  34. Van Aken J. (2004), Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: the Quest for Field-tested and Grounded Technological Rules, Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), pp. 219-246.
  35. Van der Steen M. (2011), The emergence and change of management accounting routines, DOI: 10.1108/09513571111133072
  36. Visani F. (2017), Applying business analytics for performance measurement and management: the case study of a software company, Management Control, 2, pp. 89-123.
  37. Visani F., Silvi R., Bartolini M., & Raffoni A. (2012), Business performance analytics: Level of adoption and support provided to performance measurement systems, Management Control, supplemento 3, pp. 117-142.
  38. Yin R. K. (2008), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  39. Zhang J., Yang X., and Appelbaum D. (2015), Toward Effective Big Data Analysis in Continuous Auditing, Accounting Horizons, 29(2), pp. 469-476.

Franco Visani, Filippo Boccali, Powering management control with Business Analytics: An institutional perspective to uncover the enablers of adoption in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 1 Suppl./2025, pp 93-120, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2025-001-S1005