Valutare il capitale umano degli insegnanti attraverso il modello del DIGCOMPEDU. Il caso di studio del progetto CAVE-Communication and Visual education in Homeschooling

Titolo Rivista RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Autori/Curatori Ida Cortoni, Giuliana Parente
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/88-89
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 26 P. 162-187 Dimensione file 637 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2024-088009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This contribution focuses on one of the three components of the DESI Index (Digital Economy and Society Index), human capital, through the presentation of the CAVE-Communication and Visual Ed-ucation in Homeschooling project, funded by the European Commis-sion through the National Agency for the Erasmus+ Program to the primary school teachers. The article presents the preliminary evaluation results of the CAVE project related to the digital skills of teachers ac-quired during the 2022-2023 experimentation. This study makes it pos-sible to frame the type and level of knowledge and skills of primary school teachers in 5 European countries involved in the project (Italy, Spain, Lithuania, Romania and Poland), trying to emphasize at what moment in the professional life of digital teaching it is more domesti-cated to achieve professional goals than the main six areas of integra-tion outlined in the European framework DIGCOMPEDU (Professional Engagement, Digital Resources, Teaching and Learning, Assessment, Empowering Learners and Facilitating Learners). In fact, this model represents one of the European Commission's main tools for investigat-ing the human capital of educators at a European level, in a compara-tive key, in line with the criteria underlying the DESI INDEX, contex-tualised in the specific field of school.

Parole chiave:human capital; digital skills; school; participatory evalua-tion; pluralist approach; DESI INDEX.

  1. Nesbit, J. C., Belfer, K., & Leacock, T. L. (2004). LORI 1.5: Learning Object Review Instrument. Retrieved July 26, 2006, from http://www.elera.net.
  2. Addario, N. (a cura di) (1994). Il problema micro-macro nelle teorie sociologiche contemporanee. Franco Angeli, Milano
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood: 241–58
  4. Bulger, M., & Davison, P. (2018). The Promises, Challenges, and Futures of Media Literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 10(1), 1-21.  DOI: 10.23860/JMLE-2018-10-1-
  5. Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist,.24(4), 409–429.
  6. Commissione Europea/EACEA/Eurydice, 2019. The Structure of the European Education Systems 2019/20: Schematic Diagrams. Eurydice Facts and Figures. Lussemburgo: Ufficio delle pubblicazioni dell'Unione europea
  7. Cortoni, I. (2020). Le competenze digitali della scuola. Carocci: Roma
  8. Davidson E. J. (2005). Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc., DOI: 10.4135/9781452230115
  9. Donati, P. (2021). Sociologia relazionale. Come cambiare la società. Scholé: Milano
  10. Fabbri, L., Striano, M., e Melacarne, C. (2008). L’insegnante riflessivo: coltivazione e trasformazione delle pratiche professionali. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  11. Fetterman, D.M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage.
  12. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S.J., Wandersman, A., (1996). Empowerment Evaluation, Sage, Thousand Oaks CA.
  13. Glouberman, S. e Zimmerman, B. (2002). Complicated and Complex Systems: What Would Successful Reform of Medicare Look Like? Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada: Discussion Paper No. 8. 8.
  14. Hartai,, L (2014). Report on Formal Media Education in Europe. OFI (Hungarian Institute for Education Research and Development, Hungary). Emedus: European Media Literacy Education Study. Disponibile al seguente link: https://eavi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Media-Education-in-European-Schools-2.pdf
  15. Hobbs, R. & Tuzel, S. (2017). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Educational Technology 48(1), 7 – 22.
  16. Korthagen, F. A. M., e Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in Reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. 11(1), 47-71
  17. Loera, B., Ferrero Camoletto R. (2004). Capitale sociale e partecipazione politica dei giovani. Libreria stampatori: Torino
  18. Nuzzaci, A. (2009). La riflessività nella progettazione educativa: verso una riconcettualizzazione delle routine. Giornale Italiano della Ricerca Educativa, I (2/3), 59-75.
  19. Palumbo, M. (2001). Il processo di valutazione. Programmare, decidere, valutare. Franco Angeli: Milano
  20. Pawson, R. e Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation, Sage, London.
  21. Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology. 24, pp. 1-24
  22. Punie, Y., Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg.
  23. Torrigiani, C. (2010). Valutare per apprendere. Capitale sociale e teoria del programma. Franco Angeli: Milano
  24. Rogers, P. J. (2008). Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions. Evaluation. 14(1), 29–48. DOI: 10.1177/135638900708467
  25. Rogers, P.J. (2010). Implications of Complicated and Complex Characteristics for Key Tasks in Evaluation in Marra M., Schwartz R., Forss K. Evaluating the Complex: Attribution, Contribution and Beyond. Transactions Publisher, Nwe Brunswick, NJ.
  26. Sanderson, I. (2000). Evaluation in Complex Policy Systems. Evaluation. 6(4), 433–454. DOI: 10.1177/1356389002220941
  27. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. (4th ed), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
  28. Stame, N. (2016). Valutazione pluralista. FrancoAngeli: Milano.
  29. Stame, N. e Lo Presti, V. (2015), “Positive Thinking and Learning from Evaluation”, in Bohni Nielsen, S., Turksema, R. and Van der Knaap, P., Evaluation and Success, New Brunswick, NJ, Transactions Publisher.
  30. Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluative Research. Russell Sage Foundation.

Ida Cortoni, Giuliana Parente, Valutare il capitale umano degli insegnanti attraverso il modello del DIGCOMPEDU. Il caso di studio del progetto CAVE-Communication and Visual education in Homeschooling in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 88-89/2024, pp 162-187, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2024-088009