L’Istituto Tavistock Relationships di Londra Il training in psicoterapia psicoanalitica di coppia

Titolo Rivista INTERAZIONI
Autori/Curatori Mary Morgan
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 13 P. 58-70 Dimensione file 189 KB
DOI 10.3280/INT2023-002006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Nell’articolo viene descritto il training psicoanalitico di coppia della Tavistock Rela-tionships da diverse prospettive. In primo luogo, il contesto organizzativo, sociale e poli-tico in cui si è sviluppata il training. In secondo luogo, l’approccio e le influenze della teoria psicoanalitica, in particolare, quelle della tradizione Tavistock. Vengono descritti alcuni concetti chiave della psicoanalisi di coppia insegnati nel corso di formazione. In terzo luogo, vengono delineati gli attuali insegnamenti e la metodologia del training. Infi-ne, si considerano i limiti e le possibilità di una formazione psicoanalitica di coppia.;

Keywords:formazione in psicoterapia psicoanalitica di coppia, Tavistock Relation-ships, tradizione Tavistock, concetti teorici di coppia, temi della formazione.

  1. Astbury B.E. (1955) Foreword. In Bannister K., Lyons A., Pincus L., Robb J., Shooter A., Stephens J., Social casework in Marital Problems. London: Tavistock Publications.
  2. Bion W.R. (1961). Experiences in Groups and Other Papers. London: Karnac.
  3. Bion W.R. (1962). Learning from Experience. London: Karnac.
  4. Bion W.R. (1967). A theory of thinking. In Bion W.R., Second Thoughts. London: Karnac.
  5. Britton R. (1989). The missing link: Parental sexuality in the Oedipus Complex. In Steiner J. (Ed.), The Oedipus Complex Today: Clinical Implications. London: Karnac.
  6. Britton R. (1998). Belief and psychic reality. In Britton R., Belief and Imagination: Explorations in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  7. Britton R. (2003). Narcissistic problems in sharing space. In Britton R., Sex, Death, and the Superego: Experiences in Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
  8. Clulow C. (2009). Sex, Attachment and Couple Psychotherapy: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. London: Karnac.
  9. Dicks H.V. (1967). Marital Tensions. Clinical Studies towards a Psychological Theory of Interaction. London: Karnac, 1993.
  10. Fisher J. (1999). The Uninvited Guest. Emerging from Narcissism towards Marriage. London: Karnac.
  11. Grier F. (Ed.) (2005). Oedipus and the Couple. London: Karnac.
  12. Humphries J. (2015). Working in the presence of unconscious couple beliefs. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 5, 1: 25-40.
  13. Jung C.G. (1925). Marriage as a Psychological relationship. In Jung C.G., The Collected Works of C.G. Jung, vol. 17. United Kingdom: The University Press Group Ltd.
  14. Mattinson J. (1975). The Reflection Process in Casework Supervision. London: Institute of Marital Studies, 1992.
  15. Menzies I. (1960). A case study in the functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety: A report on a study of the nursing service of a General Hospital. Human Relations, 13, 2: 95-121. DOI: 10.1177/00187267600130020
  16. Morgan M. (1995). The projective gridlock: A form of projective identification in couple relationships. In Ruszczynski S., Fisher J.V. (Eds.), Intrusiveness and intimacy in the couple. London: Karnac.
  17. Morgan M. (2004). On being able to be a couple: the importance of a “creative couple” in psychic life. In Grier F., Oedipus & the Couple. London: Karnac.
  18. Morgan M. (2010). Unconscious beliefs about being a couple. In Nathans S., Schaefer M. (Eds.), Couples on the couch. Psychoanalytic couple therapy and the Tavistock Model. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
  19. Morgan M. (2019) A couple state of mind: psychoanalysis of couples and the Tavistock Relationships Model. London & New York: Routledge.
  20. Pincus L., Bannister K., Lyons A., Robb J., Shooter A., Stephens J. (1955). Social casework in Marital Problems: The Development of a Psychodynamic Approach. London: Tavistock Publications.
  21. Ruszczynski S. (1993). The theory and practice of the Tavistock Institute of Marital Studies. In: Ruszczynski S. (Ed.), Psychotherapy with couples: Theory and practice at the Tavistock Institute of Marital Studies. London: Karnac.
  22. Ruszczynski S. (1995). Narcissistic object relating. In Ruszczynski S., Fisher J.V. (Eds.), Intrusiveness and intimacy in the couple. London: Karnac.
  23. Ruszczynski S., Fisher J.V. (Eds.) (1995). Intrusiveness and intimacy in the couple. London: Karnac.
  24. Searles H.F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experiences. Psychiatry, 18, 2: 135-146.
  25. Steiner J. (1987). The interplay between pathological organisations and the paranoid-schizoid and depressive position. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 68: 69-80.
  26. Trist E., Murray H.A. (1990). Historical Overview: The Foundation and Development of the Tavistock Institute. In Trist E., Murray H., The Social Engagement of Social Science. Volume 1: The Socio-Psychological Perspective. London: Free Association Books.

Mary Morgan, L’Istituto Tavistock Relationships di Londra Il training in psicoterapia psicoanalitica di coppia in "INTERAZIONI" 2/2023, pp 58-70, DOI: 10.3280/INT2023-002006