Improvement of the legislation of Kazakhstan on the prevention of offences by persons sentenced to restriction of liberty

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Almagul Primkulova, Salimgerey Karakushev, Alissa Issergepova, Gulnara Abdirova, Malik Mukanov
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/1 T.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 11 P. 267-277 Dimensione file 90 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1017
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Modern world trends tend to introduce standards under which there is a gradual departure from imprisonment as the main type of criminal punishment of convicts. Following the norms of the current legislation of Kazakhstan, the functions of mon- itoring such persons are carried out by the probation service. It implements a wide range of powers to supervise the registered contingent and interacts in this area with many government agencies and institutions. The article examines the issues of or- ganizing effective preventive work in Kazakhstan with persons sentenced to re- striction of liberty and other measures of criminal punishment not related to deprivation of liberty. The methods used in the work are: analysis of legislative and ap- plied aspects of the activities of state bodies and institutions executing criminal pen- alties, system-structural (scientific knowledge of intra-industry relations), compara- tive analysis (identification of continuity and specificity of various approaches to the formation of an optimal model of interaction between the subjects of preventive ac- tivities), logical method and method of transition from general concepts to private ones. It was found out that the role of the probation service in preventing new of- fences on the part of convicts is great since in recent years their number has been constantly growing, which indicates insufficient preventive work carried out by in- terested state bodies. One of the reasons for this situation is the imperfection of the legal framework governing their activities. The analysis of the current legislation showed the absence of norms in it that create a unified system for organizing pre- ventive work with the registered contingent for all bodies. With this in mind, pro- posals are being made to improve the norms of the Law of Kazakhstan “On Proba- tion”.

Keywords:probation service, registered contingent, humanization, justice, criminal policy.

  1. Akashi F. (2018). The role of volunteer probation officers in Japan – Recent challenges and responses. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 54: 121- 132.
  2. Akimzhanov T.K. (2019). Penitentiary crime as an object of independent crimino- logical research. Criminal Executive Law, 14: 202-216.
  3. Badovskis M., Briede J., Danovskis E., Dupate K., Karkliņa A., Ketners K., Liholaja V., Rodiņa A. and Strada-Rozenberga K. (2017). Public law. In: Kerikmäe T., Joamets K., Pleps J., Rodiņa A., Berkmanas T., Gruodytė E. (eds), The Law of the Baltic States (pp. 191-275). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54478-6_5
  4. Barash Y. (2022). Modern means of correction and resocialization of convicted per- sons. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 12(1): 41-47. DOI: 10.56215/04221201.41
  5. Blahuta R. and Basysta I. (2022). Some problems of making a procedural decision to close criminal proceedings in connection with the release of a person from criminal liability. Social and Legal Studios, 5(1): 22-28. DOI: 10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-22-28
  6. Cherniavskyi S., Vozniuk A. and Hribov M. (2023). Legality of traditional tech- niques, means and modern technologies of visual surveillance. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 28(1): 9-21.
  7. Criminal executive code of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 234-V ZRK (2014). -- Text available at the website http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K1400000234 June 15, 2023.
  8. Czubenko K., Gendelis D. and Bschor Y. (2022). Strengthening EU Defence Capa- bilities Under Conditions of the Russian-Ukrainian War. Foreign Affairs, 32(5): 16-23. DOI: 10.46493/2663-2675.32(5).2022.16-23
  9. Deineha M. (2022). Mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution: Inter- national and national practices in legal regulation. Law. Human. Environment, 13(4): 16-25.
  10. Dolgova A.I. (2016). Criminology. Moscow: Legal Publishing House “Norma”. Dzhansaraeva R.E. (2006). Problems of combating crime in correctional facilities: Thesis of the doctor of juridical sciences. Ryazan: Academy of the Federal Pen- itentiary Service of Russia.
  11. Lapkin A., Maryniv V., Yevtieieva D., Stolitnii A. and Borovyk A. (2019). Com- pensation for damage caused by offences as the way of protection of victims’ rights (On the example of Ukraine): The economic and legal aspects. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(3).
  12. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 271-IV “On Prevention of Offenses” (2010).
  13. -- Text available at the website https://online.zakon.kz/document/? Doc_id = 30657323 June 11, 2023.
  14. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 38-VI “On probation” (2016). -- Text avail- able at the website https://online.zakon.kz/document/?doc_id=36232217 June 13, 2023.
  15. Levchenko Y. and Vasylevych V. (2022). Some aspects of perfecting the system of penitentiary bodies and institutions. Law Journal of the National Academy of In- ternal Affairs, 12(4): 40-48. DOI: 10.56215/04221204.40
  16. Lutsenko O. (2017). Bringing civil servants to liability for disciplinary misconduct in judicial practice of Ukraine, Poland, Bulgaria and Czech Republic. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(1): 103-112.
  17. Meleshchenko T. (2023). The political path of independent Ukraine from the na- tional-state revival to its place in the modern historical process. Foreign Affairs, 33(2): 31-41. DOI: 10.46493/2663-2675.33(2).2023.31-41
  18. Normative resolution of the Supreme court of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 4 “On some issues of the appointment of criminal punishment” (2015). -- Text available at the website http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P150000004S June 25, 2023.
  19. Novikovas A., Novikoviene L., Shapoval R. and Solntseva K. (2017). The peculiar- ities of motivation and organization of civil defence service in Lithuania and Ukraine. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(2): 369-380.
  20. Odintsova L.N. (2020). Peculiarities of persons registered with the penitentiary in- spectorate: An analytical review. Novokuznetsk: Kuzbass Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.
  21. President of Kazakhstan Kassym-Jomart Tokayev’s state of the nation address “Con- structive public dialogue – the basis of stability and prosperity of Kazakhstan” (2019). -- Text available at the website https://goo.su/I5mcV June 20, 2023.
  22. Shapoval R., Bytiak I., Khrystynchenko N. and Solntseva K. (2018). Problematic issues of the administrative and legal status of the police in the baltic states (Lith- uania, Latvia, Estonia). Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1): 295-306.
  23. Spytska L. (2022). Analysis of the most unusual court decisions in the world practice in terms of the right to justice. Social and Legal Studios, 5(4): 39-45. DOI: 10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-4-39-45
  24. Surzik Yu. (2022). Decision of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the constitu- tionality of Articles 81, 82 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in the practical use of the European Court of Human Rights. Law. Human. Environment, 13(3): 65-71.
  25. Tacij V.J., Tjutjugin V.I. and Grodeckij J.V. (2014). Conceptual model establish re- sponsibility for offense in the legislation of Ukraine (draft). Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law, 2014(3): 166-183.
  26. Tănase O. (2022). Regulatory consolidation of coercion as a prerogative of the rule of law: A literary review. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Af- fairs, 12(4): 84-94. DOI: 10.56215/04221204.84
  27. United Nations Standard minimum rules for non-custodial measures (The Tokyo Rules) (1990). -- Text available at the website https://digitallibrary.un.org/ record/105347?ln=ru#record-files-collapse-header June 15, 2023.
  28. Veselov M.I. (2015). Topical issues of solving problems of operational-search ac- tivity by operational units of institutions and bodies executing criminal punish- ments. Vladimir: Vladimir Law Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia.
  29. Vozniuk A. (2022). Criminal and legal counteraction to the activities of criminal authorities: The Ukrainian model. Scientific Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 27(1): 9-19. DOI: 10.56215/0122271.9
  30. Zinoviyev I.L. (2017). Criminal punishment in the form of forced labor: thesis of the candidate of juridical sciences. Moscow: University of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation.

Almagul Primkulova, Salimgerey Karakushev, Alissa Issergepova, Gulnara Abdirova, Malik Mukanov, Improvement of the legislation of Kazakhstan on the prevention of offences by persons sentenced to restriction of liberty in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1 T./2023, pp 267-277, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1017