Valore e rischio nelle organizzazioni non-profit: i prodromi di una ricerca sullo sviluppo di modelli innovativi di misurazione e valutazione

Titolo Rivista WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
Autori/Curatori Paolo Ricci
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2022/2 Suppl.
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 15 P. 133-147 Dimensione file 399 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2022-002-S1013
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il presente lavoro mira a individuare i prodromi di una ricerca sul tema della Al-ternative Accounting (AA) per le Organizzazioni Non Profit (ONP) con particolare riguardo al significato che assumono in tali aziende il valore creato e il rischio. Il perseguimento di obiettivi sociali e l’assenza del profitto quale principale driver di gestione rende la misurazione delle loro performance difficile e spesso imprecisa, in alcuni casi fuorviante. Lo studio di modelli alternativi di misurazione e valutazione dei risultati va svolto considerando la soggettività economica e le relazioni di potere che si sviluppano, sia nella gestione sia nella rendicontazione: ciò determina il rischio di dover assecondare interessi non istituzionali, sna-turando le finalità di fondo. La elaborazione di un modello di AA rappresenta il tentativo di superare sia i limiti delle misurazioni tradizionali sia quelli della non-financial disclosure, consentendo la lettura delle diverse dimensioni del valore creato dalle ONP, migliorando il loro livello di accountability verso i vari stakeholder e potendo giungere a una più efficace comprensione dei processi di creazione di valore.;

Keywords:Non-profit; Alternative accounting; Accountability; Valore; Ri-schio.

  1. Andreaus M. and Costa E. (2014). Toward an Integrated Accountability Model for Nonprofit Organizations. Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non-Profit Organizations (Advances in Public Interest Accounting), 17: 153-176.
  2. Anessi-Pessina E., Barbera C., Langella C., Manes-Rossi F., Sancino A., Sicilia M. and Steccolini I. (2020). Reconsidering public budgeting after the COVID-19 outbreak: key lessons and future challenges. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(5): 957-965. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-07-2020-0115
  3. Anheier H.K. (2014). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London and New York: Routledge.
  4. Arvidson M. and Lyon F. (2013). Social Impact Measurement and Non-profit Organisations: Compliance, Resistance, and Promotion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4): 869-886.
  5. Grønbjerg K.A. (1998). Markets, politics, and charity: Nonprofits in the political economy. In: Powell W.W. and Clemens E.S., Private action and the public good, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  6. Hazen T.L. and Hazen L.L. (2012). Punctilios and Nonprofit Corporate Governance - A Comprehensive Look at Nonprofit Directors' Fiduciary Duties. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 14: 347-416. DOI: 10.4159/9780674037298-006
  7. ISTAT (2022). Struttura e profili del settore non profit. Roma: ISTAT.
  8. Jørgensen T.B. and Bozeman B. (2007). Public Values: An Inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3): 354-381. DOI: 10.1177/0095399707300703
  9. Kolleck N. (2019). The power of third sector organizations in public education. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(4): 411-425.
  10. Maiocchi M., Ricci P. and Turconi G. (2019). Bilancio in valore. Come si misura un’ora di gioia?. Rimini: Maggioli Editore.
  11. Malatesta D. and Smith C.R. (2014). Lessons from Resource Dependence Theory for Contemporary Public and Nonprofit Management. Public Administration Review. 74(1): 14-25.
  12. Manetti G., Bellucci M. and Oliva S. (2021). Unpacking dialogic accounting: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9): 250-283. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4736
  13. Mazzotta R. (2020). Il terzo settore. In: Ricci P., Siboni B. & Nardo M. T., a cura di, Prime riflessioni sulla misurazione degli impatti nelle organizzazioni non profit: tra teorie e pratiche territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  14. Messner M. (2009). The limits of accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(8), 918-938.
  15. Meyer M., Buber R. and Aghamanoukjan A. (2013). In Search of Legitimacy: Managerialism and Legitimation in Civil Society Organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(1): 167-193.
  16. Minkoff D.C. and Powell W.W. (2006). Nonprofit Mission: Constancy, Responsiveness, or Deflection?. In: Powell W.W. and Steinberg R., a cura di, The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  17. Mook L., Chan A. and Kershaw D. (2015). Measuring Social Enterprise Value Creation. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2): 189-207.
  18. Moore M. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1): 183-204.
  19. Moore M.H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
  20. Moro G. (2014). Contro il non profit. Bari: Editori Laterza.
  21. Mulgan R. (2000). ‘Accountability’: An Ever-Expanding Concept?. Public Administration, 78: 555-573. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00218
  22. Fröhlich C. and Skokova Y. (2020). Two for One: Public Welfare and Regime Legitimacy Through State Funding for CSOs in Russia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4): 698-709.
  23. Esping-Andersen G., a cura di (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199256438.001.0001
  24. Edelman (2018). Edelman Trust Barometer. -- https://www.edelman.com/trust/2018-trust-barometer [consultato il 12 dicembre 2022].
  25. Edelman (2020). Edelman Trust Barometer 2020. -- https://www.edelman.it/ sites/g/files/aatuss391/files/2020-04/2020%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20master% 20website.pdf [consultato il 12 dicembre 2022].
  26. Dumay J., Guthrie J. and Rooney J. (2020). Being critical about intellectual capital accounting in 2020: An overview. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 70: 1-9.
  27. Drucker P.F. (1989). What business can learn from nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 67(4): 88-93.
  28. Dobson J. (2020). A part and yet apart: how third sector visions of carbon reduction are both welcomed and marginalised. Voluntary Sector Review, 11(2): 193-210.
  29. Dent G.W. (2013). Corporate Governance Without Shareholders: A Cautionary Lesson From Non-Profit Organizations. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  30. Costa E., Ramus T. and Andreaus M. (2011). Accountability as a Managerial Tool in Non-Profit Organizations: Evidence from Italian CSVs. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3): 470-493.
  31. Civitillo R. (2016). L’aziendalità nel volontariato. Il non profit nella provincia di Benevento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  32. Civitillo R. (2021). Management in the Non-profit Sector: A Necessary Balance Between Values, Responsibility and Accountability. New York: Routledge.
  33. Cheah J., Amran A. and Yahya S. (2019). Internal oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: How can social enterprises help themselves before helping others?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211: 607-619.
  34. Campopiano G. and Bassani G. (2020). Social innovation: Learning from social cooperatives in the Italian context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291: 125253.
  35. Bryson J., Sancino A., Benington J. and Sørensen E. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5): 640-654. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164
  36. Bryce H.J. (2014). Public policy rules and norms in choice of a nesting place of a social enterprise. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 3(2): 237-253.
  37. Bruni L. and Zamagni S., a cura di (2009). Dizionario di economia civile. Roma: Città Nuova.
  38. Bronzetti G. (2008). Le aziende non profit. Un esame degli strumenti di controllo di gestione (Vol. 155). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  39. Brody E. (2010). The board of nonprofit organizations: puzzling through the gaps between law and practice – a view from the United States. In: Klaus J.H and Von Hippel T., Comparative Corporate Governance of Non-Profit Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  40. Bovens M. (2010). Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946-967. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2010.486119
  41. Smith S.R. (2008). The Challenge of Strengthening Nonprofits and Civil Society. Public Administration Review, 68: S132-S145.
  42. Speckbacher G. (2003). The Economics of Performance Management in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 13(3): 267-281.
  43. Suarez D.F. (2011). Collaboration and Professionalization: The Contours of Public Sector Funding for Nonprofit Organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2): 307-326.
  44. Tenbensel T., Dwyer J. and Lavoie J. (2014). How Not to Kill the Golden Goose: Reconceptualizing accountability environments of third-sector organizations. Public Management Review, 16(7): 925-944. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.770054
  45. Toepler S. and Anheier H.K. (2004). Organizational theory and nonprofit management: An overview. In: Zimmer A. & Priller E., Editors, Future of Civil Society. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  46. Tracey P., Phillips N. and Haugh H. (2005). Beyond Philanthropy: Community Enterprise as a Basis for Corporate Citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58: 327-344.
  47. Van Dyk L. and Fourie L. (2015). Challenges in donor-NPO relationships in the context of corporate social investment. Communicatio, 41(1): 108-130. DOI: 10.1080/02500167.2015.1022563
  48. Veltri S. and Bronzetti G. (2015). A Critical Analysis of the Intellectual Capital Measuring, Managing, and Reporting Practices in the Non-profit Sector: Lessons Learnt from a Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(2): 305-318.
  49. Wolf M. and Mair J. (2019). Purpose, Commitment and Coordination Around Small Wins: A Proactive Approach to Governance in Integrated Hybrid Organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 30(3): 535-548.
  50. Wondolleck J.M. and Yaffee S.L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington: Island Press.
  51. Zamagni S. (2008). Regolamentazione del terzo settore e innovazione sociale. In: Bassi A., Venturi P., a cura di, Regolamentazione del terzo settore e innovazione sociale. Forlì: Aiccon.
  52. Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson J., Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport: Greenwood.
  53. Bocquet R., Cotterlaz-Rannard G. and Ferrary M. (2020). How Do NPOs Get Funding? A Business Model Perspective Based on the Conversion of Symbolic Capital. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6): 1233-1258. DOI: 10.1177/0899764020925912
  54. Bertlesmann Stiftung and Social Value Italia (2016). Social Impact Navigator. -- https://www.socialvalueitalia.it/associazione/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Social-Impact-Navigator-ITA-pagine-singole-1-1.pdf [consultato il 12 dicembre 2022].
  55. Berger I.E. (2006). Identity, Identification, and Relationship Through Social Alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2): 128-137. DOI: 10.1177/0092070305284973
  56. Bellostas A.J., López-Arceiz F.J. and Mateos L. (2015). Social Value and Economic Value in Social Enterprises: Value Creation Model of Spanish Sheltered Workshops. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1): 367-391.
  57. Mussari R. and Monfardini P. (2010). Practices of social reporting in public sector and non-profit organizations: An Italian perspective. Public Management Review, 12(4), 487-492.
  58. Najam A. (1996). Understanding the third sector: Revisiting the prince, the merchant, and the citizen. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7: 203-219.
  59. Nardo M.T. & Siboni B. (2018). Requirements and Practices of Social Reporting in Italian Not-for-Profit Organisations. In: Tench R., Jones B. & Sun W., editors, The Critical State of Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, pp. 299-317. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  60. Normann R. and Ramirez R. (1998). Designing Interactive Strategy: From Value Chain to Value Constellation. New York: Wiley.
  61. Porter M.E. and Kramer M.R. (1999). Philanthropy’s new agenda: Creating value. Harvard Business Review, 77: 121-131.
  62. Powell M. and Barrientos A. (2004). Welfare regimes and the welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1): 83-105.
  63. Putnam R.D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  64. Quélin B.V., Kivleniece I. and Lazzarini S. (2017). Public-Private Collaboration, Hybridity and Social Value: Towards New Theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6): 763-792.
  65. Rehli F. and Jäger U.P. (2011). The Governance of International Nongovernmental Organizations: How Funding and Volunteer Involvement Affect Board Nomination Modes and Stakeholder Representation in International Nongovernmental Organizations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(4): 587-612.
  66. Reith S. (2010). Money, power, and donor–NGO partnerships. Development in Practice, 20(3): 446-455. DOI: 10.1080/09614521003709932
  67. Ricci P. (2020). L’accountability negli enti non profit. In: Ricci P., Siboni B., & Nardo M.T., a cura di, Prime riflessioni sulla misurazione degli impatti nelle organizzazioni non profit: tra teorie e pratiche territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  68. Ricci P. (2019). L’accountability pubblica. In: Anselmi L. e Pozzoli S., a cura di, Le Aziende Pubbliche. Aspetti di governance, gestione, misurazione, valutazione e rendicontazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  69. Ricci P. (2016). Accountability (voce), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance, Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2321
  70. Ricci P. (2010). Il soggetto economico nell’azienda pubblica. Chi comanda davvero nell’azienda pubblica e perché. Roma: RIREA.
  71. Ricci P., Nardo M.T. e Siboni B., a cura di (2020). Prime riflessioni sulla misurazione degli impatti nelle organizzazioni non profit: tra teorie e pratiche territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  72. Saebi T., Foss N.J. and Linder S. (2018). Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises. Journal of Management, 45(1): 70-95. DOI: 10.1177/0149206318793196
  73. Schiller R.S. and Almog-Bar M. (2013). Revisiting collaborations between nonprofits and businesses: An NPO-centric view and typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5): 942-962. DOI: 10.1177/0899764012471753
  74. Selsky J.W. and Parker B. (2005). Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice. Journal of Management, 31(6): 849-873. DOI: 10.1177/0149206305279601
  75. Sicilia M., Guarini E., Sancino A., Andreani M. and Ruffini R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1): 8-27. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314566008

Paolo Ricci, Valore e rischio nelle organizzazioni non-profit: i prodromi di una ricerca sullo sviluppo di modelli innovativi di misurazione e valutazione in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 2 Suppl./2022, pp 133-147, DOI: 10.3280/WE2022-002-S1013