Giusta transizione ecologica: l’impatto delle tecnologie digitali

Titolo Rivista GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI
Autori/Curatori Elena Verdolini, Chiara Belpietro
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/174
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 20 P. 205-224 Dimensione file 255 KB
DOI 10.3280/GDL2022-174002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Il concetto di «just twin transitions», ossia «transizioni gemelle e giuste», è sempre più al cen-tro di discussioni pubbliche e dibattiti politici; esso indica la duplice transizione in campo eco-logico e in campo digitale, e promuove l’idea che gli sforzi per perseguire queste transizioni devono essere accompagnati da misure tese a «non lasciare indietro nessuno». Tuttavia, le im-plicazioni derivanti dalle connessioni, sinergie o incongruenze tra queste due transizioni non sono ancora state oggetto di analisi sistematica. Questo articolo illustra le possibili e verosimili ripercussioni negative (N) o positive (P) delle tecnologie digitali sugli obiettivi della giusta transizione ecologica, ossia (1) l’azione per il clima, (2) la promozione di lavori di qualità e qualificanti e (3) l’identificazione di interventi tesi a ridurre gli impatti sociali negativi della transizione ecologica sulle fasce meno abbienti e più a rischio. Sulla base di questa analisi, vengono discussi i motivi che giustificano un’analisi congiunta della transizione ecologica e di quella digitale.;

Keywords:Transizione ecologica; Transizione giusta; Rivoluzione digitale.

  1. Acemoglu D., Restrepo P. (2020). Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. JPE, 128(6): 2188 ss.
  2. Acemoglu,D., Lelarge C., Restrepo P. (2020). Competing with Robots: Firm-Level Evidence from France. AEA, 110: 383 ss.
  3. Ali A., Hamouda W., Uysal M. (2015). Next generation M2M cellular networks: Challenges and practical considerations. IEEECM, 53(9).
  4. Arfanuzzaman M. (2021). Harnessing artificial intelligence and big data for SDGs and prosperous urban future in South Asia. ESI, 11: 100127.
  5. Autor D.H., Dorn D. (2013). The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market. AER, 103(5): 1553 ss.
  6. Autor D.H., Katz L.F., Kearney M.S. (2008). Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists. RES, 90(2): 300 ss.
  7. Avgerinou M., Bertoldi P., Castellazzi L. (2017). Trends in Data Centre Energy Consumption under the European Code of Conduct for Data Centre Energy Efficiency. Energies, 10(10).
  8. AWS (2018). Your Guide to AI and Machine Learning at re:Invent 2018 | AWS Machine Learning Blog. AWS Machine Learning Blog. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://aws.amazon.com/ blogs/machine-learning/your-guide-to-ai-and-machine-learning-at-reinvent-2018/ (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  9. Brennen J.S., Kreiss D. (2016). Digitalization. In: Aa.Vv., The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Wiley, 1 ss.
  10. Brown S. (2020). A new study measures the actual impact of robots on jobs. It’s significant. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/a-new-study-measures-actual-impact-robots-jobs-its-significant (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  11. Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A., eds. (2014). The Second Machine Age. Norton & Company.
  12. China Daily (2022). Platform economy needs push to give consumption a boost. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202203/16/WS62311e9ea310fd2b29e51120.html (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  13. Coroamă, V.C., Mattern F. (2019). Digital Rebound. Why Digitalization Will Not Redeem Us Our Environmental Sins. In: Wolff. A. (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S 2019, Lappeenranta, Finland, June 10-14, 2019. Volume 2382 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
  14. Dachs B., Kinkel S., Jäger A. (2019). Bringing it all back home? Backshoring of manufacturing activities and the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. JWB, 54(6).
  15. Dauth W., Findeisen S., Suedekum J., Woessner N. (2021). The Adjustment of Labor Markets to Robots. JEEA, 19(6): 3104 ss.
  16. European Commission (2018). Sustainable Mobility for Europe: safe, connected, and clean.
  17. European Commission (2019). The European Green Deal.
  18. European Commission (2020). An SME Strategy for a sustainable and digital Europe.
  19. Faber M. et al. (2020). Robots and Reshoring: Evidence from Mexican Labor Markets. JIE: 127.
  20. Fernández-Macías E., (2018). Automation, digitisation and platforms : implications for work and employment. Dublin: Eurofound.
  21. Foster C., Azmeh S. (2020). Latecomer Economies and National Digital Policy: An Industrial Policy Perspective. JDS: 56(7).
  22. Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? TFSC, 114: 254 ss.
  23. Galgóczi B. (2018). From Paris to Katowice: The EU Needs to Step Up its Game on Climate Change and Set its Own Just Transition Framework. ETUI Research Paper, Policy Brief 4/2018.
  24. Galgóczi B. (2019). Phasing out coal-a just transition approach. ETUI Working Paper 4/2019.
  25. Gillingham K., Rapson D., Wagner G. (2016). The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. REEP: 10(1).
  26. Goos M., Manning A. (2007). Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain. RES, 89(1): 118 ss.
  27. Graetz G., Michaels G. (2018). Robots at Work. RES, 100(5): 753 ss.
  28. Greening L.A., Greene D.L., Difiglio C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption – the rebound effect – a survey. EP, 28(6): 389 ss.
  29. Greenpeace (2020). Report: Oil in the Cloud. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/reports/oil-in-the-cloud/ (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  30. Grubler A. et al. (2018). A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °c target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. NE, 3: 515 ss.
  31. Gunkel D.J. (2016). Second Thoughts: Toward a Critique of the Digital Divide. NMS, 5(4): 499 ss.
  32. Hammond R. (2018). Megatrends of the 21st Century. Allianz Partners.
  33. Horner N.C., Shehabi A., Azevedo I.L. (2016). Known unknowns: Indirect energy effects of information and communication technology. ERL: 11(10).
  34. Huang R. et al. (2016). Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: the case of lightweight aircraft components. JCP: 135.
  35. IEA (2017a). Digitalization & Energy.
  36. IEA (2020). Energy Technology Perspectives 2020.
  37. Ilankoon I.M.S.K. et al. (2018). E-waste in the international context – A review of trade flows, regulations, hazards, waste management strategies and technologies for value recovery. WM, 82: 258 ss.
  38. ILO (2015). Guidelines for a just transition towards environmentally sustainable economies and societies for all.
  39. Inderwildi O., Zhang C., Wang X., Kraft M. (2020). The impact of intelligent cyber-physical systems on the decarbonization of energy. EES, 13(3), 744 ss.
  40. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
  41. ITUC (2015). Climate Justice: There Are No Jobs on a Dead Planet.
  42. JTC (2017). Just Transition. A Report for the OECD. Just Transition Centre.
  43. Kerras H., Sánchez-Navarro J.L., López-Becerra E.I., de-Miguel Gómez M.D. (2020). The Impact of the Gender Digital Divide on Sustainable Development: Comparative Analysis between the European Union and the Maghreb. Sustainaibility, 12(8): 3347 ss.
  44. Koch M., Manuylov I., Smolka M. (2021). Robots and Firms. EJ, 131(638): 2553 ss.
  45. Ficarra M., Rückert D., Virginie A., Weiss C. (2021). Digitalisation in Europe 2020-2021: Evidence from the EIB Investment Survey. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.eib.org/attachments/efs/digitalisation_in_europe_2020_2021_en.pdf (consultato il 25.4.2022).
  46. Masanet E., Shehabi A., Lei N., Smith S., Koomey J. (2020). Recalibrating global data center energy-use estimates. Science: 367(6481).
  47. Meyers R.J., Williams E.D., Matthews H.S. (2010). Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in homes. EB, 42(5).
  48. Morley J., Widdicks K., Hazas M. (2018). Digitalisation, energy and data demand: The impact of Internet traffic on overall and peak electricity consumption. ERSS: 38.
  49. Nakanishi T. (2017). For US autoworkers, robots are the job killers, not trade - Nikkei Asia. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/For-US-autoworkers-robots-are-the-job-killers-not-trade (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  50. Naylor S., Gillott M., Lau T. (2018). A review of occupant-centric building control strategies to reduce building energy use. RSER: 96.
  51. Newell P., Mulvaney D. (2013). The political economy of the “just transition”. GJ: 179(2).
  52. NTIA (1995). Falling Through the Net: A Survey of the “Have Nots” in Rural and Urban America. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  53. OECD (2017). OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2017. OECD.
  54. Reinhart R. (2018). Most U.S. Workers Unafraid of Losing Their Jobs to Robots. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://news.gallup.com/poll/226841/workers-unafraid-losing-jobs-robots.aspx (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  55. Rockström J. et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature: 461(7263), 472 ss.
  56. Rolnick D. et al. (2023). Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning. ACM CS, 55(2): 1 ss.
  57. Sabato S., Fonteddu B. (2020). A socially just transition through the European Green Deal? -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.etui.org/publications/socially-just-transition-through-european-green-deal (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  58. Sarc R. et al. (2019). Digitalisation and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy oriented waste management – A review. WM, 95: 476 ss.
  59. Schmidt F. (2017). Digital Labour Markets in the Platform Economy. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
  60. Segerberg A. (2017). Online and Social Media Campaigns For Climate Change Engagement. In: Aa.Vv., Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press.
  61. Sovacool B.K., Newell P., Carley S., Fanzo J. (2022). Equity, technological innovation and sustainable behaviour in a low-carbon future. NHB, 6(3): 326 ss.
  62. Steffen W. et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science: 347(6223).
  63. Stevis D., Felli R., Stevis D., Felli R. (2015). Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. IEA, 15: 29 ss.
  64. Stoll C., Klaaßen L., Gallersdörfer U. (2019). The Carbon Footprint of Bitcoin. Joule, 3(7).
  65. Strubell E., Ganesh A., Mccallum A. (2019). Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. Testo disponibile al sito: https://bit.ly/2JTbGnI (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  66. Sun C. et al. (2021). Additive manufacturing for energy: A review. AE: 282.
  67. TWI (2018). The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/twi/ TWI2050.html (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  68. Ugur M., Mitra A. (2017). Technology Adoption and Employment in Less Developed Countries: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review. WD: 96: 1 ss.
  69. UNFCCC (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement.
  70. van Dijk J., ed. (2020). The Digital Divide. Cambridge University Press.
  71. Vassilakopoulou P., Hustad E. (2021). Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research. IFS.
  72. Vranken H. (2017). Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. COES, 28: 1 ss.
  73. Watanabe C., Wakabayashi K., Miyazawa T. (2000). Industrial dynamism and the creation of a “virtuous cycle” between market growth and price reduction. Technovation, 20(6): 299 ss.
  74. WEF (2021). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Accelerate the Energy Transition.
  75. Westerhoff L., Sheppard S.R.J., Mathew Iype D., Cote S., Salter J. (2018). Social mobilization on climate change and energy: An evaluation of research projects in British Columbia, Canada. ERSS, 46: 368 ss.
  76. Williams E., Tagami T. (2002). Energy use in sales and distribution via e-commerce and conventional retail: A case study of the Japanese book sector. JIE, 6(2).
  77. Wilson C. et al. (2020). Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization. Science, 368(6486).
  78. Wire C.E. (2018). Sector coupling. Shaping an integrated renewable energy system. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/sector-coupling-shaping-integrated-renewable-power-system (consultato il 27.3.2022).
  79. WWF (2020). Living Planet Report 2020. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://livingplanet.panda.org/ (consultato il 27.3.2022).

  • Impresa e transizione ecologica: alcuni profili lavoristici Valerio Speziale, in GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI 179/2023 pp.283
    DOI: 10.3280/GDL2023-179001
  • La giusta transizione tra questione sociale e questione ambientale: il potenziale ecologico delle mobilitazioni operaie Emanuele Leonardi, in GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI 177/2023 pp.99
    DOI: 10.3280/GDL2023-177007
  • Giusta transizione ecologica e diseguaglianze: il ruolo del diritto Marzia Barbera, in GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI 175/2023 pp.339
    DOI: 10.3280/GDL2022-175002
  • Sindacato e politiche industriali in transizione. Il caso di industria italiana autobus Charlotte Bez, Angelo Castellani, Emanuela La Rocca, Gianluca Sala, in ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE 2/2024 pp.41
    DOI: 10.3280/ES2024-002004
  • Responsabilità sociale d'impresa 2.0 e sostenibilità digitale Lara Lazzeroni, (ISBN:979-12-215-0262-6)

Elena Verdolini, Chiara Belpietro, Giusta transizione ecologica: l’impatto delle tecnologie digitali in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 174/2022, pp 205-224, DOI: 10.3280/GDL2022-174002