Accounting and the budget negotiation process: The case of the Holy Shroud Exposition (1931) during a period of austerity

Titolo Rivista CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE
Autori/Curatori Giuseppe Modarelli
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 47 P. 7-53 Dimensione file 248 KB
DOI 10.3280/CCA2021-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Introduction: The paper considers the case of the Holy Shroud Exposition (1931) during a period of austerity, investigating accounting practices and the budget negotiation process. Aim of the work: The study seeks to illustrate the power structure underpinning budgetary negotiation processes related to the Holy Shroud Exposition. Methodological approach: The paper is based upon primary sources, considering internal accounting correspondence of the Savoy Ministry and other archival sources that have been interpreted in the light of the literature on the principal-agent theory used as framing paradigm. Main findings: The research identifies the role of accounting in managing/influencing social organisational-interactions, under specific historical conditions. In particular, the work shows the hierarchical structure of the Savoy Royal House (hereafter HSE), and verify the presence of opportunistic behaviours in the negotiation process realated to the authorisation of extraordinary expenses for the Holy Shroud Exposition. Originality: The paper permits to show the power of accounting to shape human interactions in the specific context represented by the climate of austerity, typical of interwar periods, that becomes a crucial antecedent of opportunistic behaviours.

Keywords:holy shroud, accounting, principal-agent, accounting correspondence, austerity, organisational repercussions

  1. Abbattista G. (1998). Storia Moderna. Roma: Donzelli.
  2. Adenmatten B. (2013). Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Berna.
  3. Akerlof A.G. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3): 488-500. DOI: 10.2307/1879431
  4. Antonelli R.(1990). Il Ministero della Real Casa dal 1848 al 1946, Segretariato Generale della Presidenza della Repubblica, Roma, Servizio Biblioteca e Documentazione (From: National Museum of the Risorgimento, Turin Documentation Papers, n. AGG 657).
  5. Antonelli V., Sargiacomo M. (2015). Alberto Ceccherelli (1885-1958): Pioneer in the History of Accounting Practice and Leader in International Dissemination. Accounting History review, 25(2): 121-144. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2015.1046890
  6. Arnold A.J. (2014). A Paradise for Profiteers’? The Importance and Treatment of Profits During the First World War. Accounting History Review, 24(2-3): 61-81.
  7. Arnold M.C. (2015). The Effect of Superiors’ Exogenous Constraints on Budget Negotiations. The Accounting Review, 90(1): 31-57. DOI: 10.2308/ACCR-50864
  8. Barraclough G. (1966). An Introduction to Contemporary History. London: C.A. Watts & Co. Ltd.
  9. Barton D., Hall N. (1984). Letter writing as a social practice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Jhon Benjamins Publishing company.
  10. Becker G. S., Stigler G. J. (1975). Law enforcement, malfeance and compensation of enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies, 65: 314-325. DOI: 10.1086/467507
  11. Billings M., Oats L. (2014). Innovation and Pragmatism in Tax Design: Excess Profits Duty in the UK During the First World War. Accounting Hisotry Review, 24(2-3): 83-101. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2014.963951
  12. Bona V. (1931). L’Ostensione della Sindone Torino MCMXXXI. Torino: Bona Vincenzo Editore (Rare Book – Archiepiscopal Archive of Turin, "Corrispondenza Ostensione"; Bunch n. 81).
  13. BroadBerry S., Haarrison M. (2005). The Economics of World War I: An Overview. Cambridge University Press.
  14. Bryman A., Bell E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Burchell G.D., Gordon C., & Miller P., Foucault M. (1991). The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Colin Gordon.
  16. Busala C.M. (2015). Casa Savoia, La Vessillogia. Word Press.
  17. Cardoni F. (2014). The ‘science’ of French public finances in the First World War. Accounting History Review, 24(2-3): 119-138. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2014.967931
  18. Carnegie G. D. (2014). Historiography for accounting: methodological contributions, contributors and thought patterns from 1983 to 2012. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability journal, 27(4): 715-755. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2013-1430
  19. Carnegie G. D., Rodrigues L. L. (2007). Exploring the dimensions of the international accounting history community. Accounting History, 12(3): 441-464. DOI: 10.1177/1032373207081601
  20. Carnegie G.D., Napier C.J. (2016). Historiography in accounting research. In: Zahirul H., Parker L.D., Covaleski M. & Haynes K., Routledge Companion to Qualitative Accounting Research Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
  21. Carr E.H. (1964). What is History?. London: Penguin.
  22. Carroll A. (2008). War letters: Extraordinary correspondence from American wars. New York: Simon & Shuster. Carruthers B. G., Espeland W. N. (1991). Accounting for rationality: doubleentry
  23. bookkeeping and the rhetoric of economic rationality, 97(1): 31-69. DOI: 10.1086/229739
  24. Castronovo V. (1997). Storia delle Regioni Italiane dall’Unità a Oggi. Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore.
  25. Catturi G. (1992). L’evoluzione storica del conto come fonte delle informazioni per le decisioni aziendali. Rivista Italiana di Ragioneria e di Economia Aziendale, Sept-Oct., 412-422.
  26. Centro Internazionale Di Sindonologia (1986). La Sindone. La Storia La Scienza. Edizioni Centrostampa.
  27. Centro Studi Piemontese, a cura di Malerba A. e Nomaglio G., Introduzione storica di Vassignana P. (2015) “Torino internazionale, Le grandi Expo tra otto e novecento”, Consiglio regionale del Piemonte.
  28. Coronella S., Antonelli V., Lombrano A. (2017). A Pioneering era of Accounting History: the Contributions of Nineteenth-Century Italian Literature and its Enduring Dissemination Around the Globe. Accounting History, 22(2): 214-243. DOI: 10.1177/1032373216662486
  29. Cozzo P. (2015). La Sindone e i Savoia. Torino: Celid.
  30. Eisenhardt M. K. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57-74.
  31. amr.1989.4279003.
  32. Foucault M. (1991). Governmentality. In: Burchell G., Gordon C., Miller P. The Foucault Effect, Studies in Govermentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  33. Foucault M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4): 777-795. DOI: 10.1086/448181
  34. Foucault M. (1995). Power/Knowledge, Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
  35. Fisher G. J., Frederickson R. J., Peffer A. S. (2000). Budgeting: An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Negotiation. The Accounting Review, 75(1): 93-114.
  36. Fitzmaurice S. M. (2002). The familiar letter in early modern English, Pragmatics and beyond, John Benjamins. Amsterdam/Philadephia.
  37. Fleischman R.K., Tyson T.N. (2000). Parallels between US and UK Cost Accountancy in the World War I Era. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 10(2): 191-212. DOI: 10.1080/095852000411032
  38. Frazier K. B., Ingram R. W., Tennyson M. B. (1984). A Methodology for the Analysis of Narrative Accounting Disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 22(1): 318-331. DOI: 10.2307/2490713
  39. Frey B.S. (2005). Non solo per denaro. Roma: Pearson Paravia Bruno Mondadori. Gerber D.A. (2000). Epistolary Ethics: Personal Correspondence and the Culture of Emigration in the Nineteenth Century. Journal of American Ethnic History, 19(4): 3-23. DOI: 10.2307/27502611
  40. Ghiberti G. (2010). Davanti alla Sindone. Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo.
  41. Gomes D. (2008). The interplay of conceptions of accounting and schools of thought in accounting history. Accounting History. 13(4): 479-509. DOI: 10.1177/1032373208095480
  42. Hamel J. (1993). Case study methods. Newburry Park: Sage.
  43. Hartmann F.G.H, Maas S.V. (2010). Why Business Unit Controllers Create Budget Slack: Involvement ion Management, Social Pressure, and Machiavellism.
  44. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 22(2): 27-29.
  45. Hazel A., Leopold T. (2013). Events and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
  46. Hopwood A.G. (1983). On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2-3): 287-305. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(83)90035-1
  47. Horvat R., Korošec B. (2015). The Role of Accounting in a Society: Only a techn(olog)ical solution for the problem of economic measurement or also a tool of social ideology?. Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, 6(4): 32-40.
  48. Jensen M., Meckling W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  49. Jones T. C., Dugdale D. (2001). The concept of an accounting regime. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 12(1): 35-63.
  50. Krikler B & Laqueur W. (1972). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary History. London: Orion.
  51. Lanza G. (1898). La Santissima Sindone del Signore che si Venera nella R.Cappella di Torino. Torino: le Roux Frassati.
  52. Levant Y., Zimnovitch H. (2017). Epistemology and management science: is accounting history still a legitimate subject of study?. Accounting History, 22(4): 450-471. DOI: 10.1177/1032373217730087
  53. Lewicki J., Litterer J., Minton J., Saunders M. (1994). Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  54. Mandelbrot B. B. (1989). The fractal geometry of nature. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A, Great Britain, 423(3-16). DOI: 10.1119/1.13295
  55. McWatters C.S. (2014). Historical Accounts, Conversations and Contexts. Accounting History Review, 24(1): 1-5. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2014.923596
  56. Miller P., Power M. (2013). Accounting, Organizing, and Economizing: Connecting Accounting Research and Organization Theory. Academy Management Annals, 7(1): 557-605.
  57. Napier C.J. (2006). Accounts of Change: 30 years of Historical Accounting Research. Accounting Organization and Society, 31(4-5): 445-507.
  58. Napier C.J. (2002). The historian as auditor: facts, judgements and evidence. Accounting Historians Journal, 21: 237-254. –- Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol29/iss2/7.
  59. Nevala M., Palander-Collin M. (2005). Letters and Letters Writing: Introduction. European Journal of English Studies, 9(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1080/13825570500067903.
  60. Niskanen A. W. (1975). Bureaucrats and Politicians. The Journal of Law & Economics, 18(3): 617-643. DOI: 10.1086/466829
  61. O’Regan P. (2015). Financial Information Analysis: the role of accounting information in modern society (3rd ed). Routledge.
  62. Oldroyd D. (1998). John Johnson’s Letters: The Accounting Role of Tudor Merchants’ Correspondence. The Accounting Historians Journal, 25(1): 57-72. –- Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol25/iss1/6.
  63. Palermo M. (2010). Lettere e epistolografia, Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Treccani.
  64. Parker L.D. (2015). Accounting Historiography: looking back to the future. Meditari Accountancy Research, 23(142-157). DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-03-2015-0018
  65. Parker R. H. (1993). The scope of accounting history: A note. Abacus, 9(1): 106-110.
  66. Posner R.A. (1997). Social Norms and the Law: An Economic Approach. The American Economic Review, 87(2): 365-369.
  67. Previts G.J., Parker L.D. And Coffman E.N. (1990). Definition and Relevance, Accounting History. ABACUS, 26(1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1990.tb00229.x.
  68. Pruitt D. G., Carnevale P. J. (1993). Negotiation in Social Conflict. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole Publishing.
  69. Rainero C., Puddu L., Coda R., Migliavacca A., Modarelli G. (2018). Esposizioni d’arte e Ostensione della S.S. Sindone tra XIX e XX secolo: un modello di amministrazione razionale, Turin, SISR XIV National Conference.
  70. Rankin F.W, Shwartz S.T., Young R.A. (2003). Management control using nonbinding budgetary announcements. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15: 75-93. DOI: 10.2308/JMAR.2003.15.1.75
  71. Riccaboni A., Giovannoni E., Giorgi A., Moscadelli S. (2006). Accounting and Power: Evidence From The Fourteenth Century. Accounting History, 11(1): 41-62. DOI: 10.1177/1032373206060082
  72. Ritter H. (1986). Dictionary of Concepts in History. Connecticut: Greenwood Press. Roncalli E. (2010). La Sindone e le Reliquie Celebri, Storia, Luoghi, Riti e Tradizioni.
  73. Fidenza: Mattioli1885. Busala C.M. (2015) Casa Savoia, La Vessillogia, WordPress.
  74. Rose S., Smith D.L. (2011). Budget Slack, Institutions, and Transparency. Public Administration Review, 71(2): 187-195. DOI: 10.2307/41433292
  75. Rutterford J., Walton P. (2014). The War, Taxation and the Blackpool Tower Company. Accounting History Review, 24(2-3): 103-117. DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2014.963954
  76. Sassure F. (2000). Course in General Linguistics. Peru. IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
  77. Senatore G. (2013). Storia della sostenibilità. Dai limiti della crescita alla genesi dello sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  78. Sreedharan E. (2007). A Manual of Historical Research Methodology: Kudappanakunnu: Centre for South India Studies.
  79. Stables A. (2002). Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis of Educational Practice: taking account of the life history. Westminster Studies in Education, 25(1): 59-66. DOI: 10.1080/0140672020250106
  80. Stacchezzini R. (2012). Accounting e potere. Il contributo interpretativo del governmentality framework. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  81. Stanley L. (2010). To the Letter: Thomas and Znaniecki’s The Polish Peasant and Writing a Life, Sociologically. Life Writing, 7(2): 139-151. DOI: 10.1080/14484520903445271
  82. Thomson (2012). Life stories and historical analysis. In Gunn S., & Faire L. (eds). Research Methods for History. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 101-117.
  83. Topolski Y. (2012). Methodology of History. Springer Science & Business Media.
  84. Townley B. (1993). Foucault, Power/Knowledge, and Its Relevance for Human Resource Management. The Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 518-545.
  85. Walker S. P. (2006). Current trends in accounting history. The Irish Accounting Review, 13: 107-121.
  86. Walker S. P. (2005). Accounting in history. Accounting Historians Journals, 32(2): 233.259. -- Available at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/aah_journal/vol32/iss2/10.
  87. Webb R.A. (2002). The impact of reputation and variance investigations on the creation of budget slack. Accounting Organization and Society, 27: 361-378. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00034-4
  88. Woodward L. (1966). The Study of Contemporary History. Journal of Contemporary History, 1(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/002200946600100102
  89. Zaccone G., M., Ghiberti G. (2007). Guardare la Sindone: cinquecento anni di liturgia sindonica. Torino: Effatà Editrice.

Giuseppe Modarelli, Accounting and the budget negotiation process: The case of the Holy Shroud Exposition (1931) during a period of austerity in "CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE" 2/2021, pp 7-53, DOI: 10.3280/CCA2021-002002