Sistemi organizzativi plurimi e discrezionalità decisionale nei servizi per il benessere e la protezione dei minori in Veneto

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Barbara Segatto, Anna Dal Ben
Anno di pubblicazione 2021 Fascicolo 2021/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 180-195 Dimensione file 454 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2021-001013
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The decisions taken by social workers in the field of child protection are influenced not only by factors related to the child and his/her life contex but also by organizational-contextual fac-tors of the social service and personal factors of the professionals (Baumann et al., 2011; Fluke et al., 2014; Benbenishity et al., 2015). The present research wanted to investigate how the organizational and professional variables affect the decisions of social workers in the child protection services in the area of the Veneto Region. 3 focus group were conducted, involving 22 social workers working in the protection services of 3 large municipalities in the Veneto Region were interviewed. The results highlight the presence of plural organizational structures and the lack of shared good practices with a shift in the decision axis towards the discretion of individual social worker.;

Keywords:Benessere dei minori; Servizio Sociale; Tutela Minori; Processo decisionale; Dimensione Organizzativa; Dimensione Professionale.

  1. Conrad D., Kellar-Guenther Y. (2006). Compassion fatigue, burnout, and compassion satisfaction among Colorado child protection workers. Child Abuse & Neglect, 30: 1071-1080.
  2. Acocella I. (2015). Il focus group: teoria e tecnica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Baumann D.J., Dalgleish L., Fluke J., Kern H. (2011). The Decision-Making Ecology. Washington, DC: American Humane Association. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/John_Fluke/publication/240245616_The_Decision-Making_Ecology/links/0deec51c4af8feb30e000000.pdf (16/11/2020).
  4. Benbenishty R., Davidson-Arad B., Lopez M., Devaney J., Spratt T., Koopmans C., Knorth E.J., Witteman C.L.M., Del Valle J.F., Hayes D. (2015). Decision Making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment sustantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49: 63-75.
  5. Bertotti T. (2010). I servizi per la tutela dei minori: evoluzioni e mutamenti. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 2: 227-224.
  6. Bertotti T. (2012). Bambini e famiglie in difficoltà. Teorie e metodi di intervento per assistenti sociali. Roma: Carocci Faber.
  7. Bhatt-Sinclair K., Sutcliffe C. (2012). What determines the out-of-home placement of children in the USA?. Children and Youth Services Review, 34: 1749-1755.
  8. Brunnberg E., Pecnik N. (2007). Assessment processes in social work with children at risk in Sweden and Croatia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(3): 231-241.
  9. Cabiati E. (2015a). Gli assistenti sociali in child protection. Cosa pensano, cosa fanno, come stanno. Un’indagine in Lombardia. Trento: Erickson.
  10. Cabiati E. (2015b). Le forme di gestione dei Servizio Tutela Minori in Lombardia: un’indagine alla luce dei processi isomorfici. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 3: 517-536.
  11. Davidson-Arad B., Benbenishty R. (2008). The role of workers’ attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers’ assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 30: 107-121.
  12. Fargion S. (2014). Synergies and tensions in child protection and parent support: policy lines and practitioners cultures. Child & Family Social Work, 19: 24-33.
  13. Fluke J.D., Bauman D.J., Dalgleish L.I., Kern H.D. (2014). Decisions to Protect Children: A Decision Making Ecology. In Korbin J.E., Krugman R.D., a cura di, Handbook of Child Maltreatment. New York: Springer.
  14. Font S.A., Maguire-Jack K. (2015). Decision-making in child protective services: Influences at multiple levels of the social ecology. Child Abuse e Neglect, 47: 70-82.
  15. Ghezzi D., Vadilonga F. (1996). La tutela del minore. Protezione dei bambini e funzione genitoriale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  16. Gilbert N., Parton N., Skivenes M. (2011). Child Protection Systems. International Trends and Orientations. USA: OPU.
  17. Glisson C., Hemmelgarn A. (1998). The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse & Neglect, 5: 401-421. DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00005-
  18. Gold N., Benbenishty R., Osmo, R. (2001). A comparative study of risk assessments and recommended interventions in Canada and Israel. Child Abuse e Neglect, 25: 607-622. DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00228-
  19. Keddell E. (2014). Current Debates on Variability in Child Welfare Decision- Making: A Selected Literature Review. Social Sciences, 3: 916-940.
  20. Krueger M. (1998). Interactive youth work practice. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
  21. Lindsey, D. (2004). The welfare of children (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  22. Mor Barak M. E., Nissly J. A., Levin A. (2001). Antecedents to retention and turnover among child welfare, social work, and other human service employees: What can we learn from past research? A review and meta-analysis. Social Service Review, 75: 625-661. DOI: 10.1086/32316
  23. Munro E. (2008). Effective Child Protection. London: Sage.
  24. Osmo R., Benbenishty R. (2004). Children at risk: Rationales for risk assessments and interventions. Children and Youth Services Review, 26: 1155-1173.
  25. Williams R., Faulkner W., Fleck J., editors (1998). Exploring Expertise. New York: Macmillan.
  26. Wulcyzn F., Gibbons R., Snowden L., Leary B. (2013). Poverty, social disadvantage, and the black/white placement gap. Children and Youth Services Review, 35: 65-74.
  27. Yoo J. (2002). The relationship between organizational variables and client outcomes: A case study in child welfare. Administration in Social Work, 26(2): 39-61.

Barbara Segatto, Anna Dal Ben, Sistemi organizzativi plurimi e discrezionalità decisionale nei servizi per il benessere e la protezione dei minori in Veneto in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 1/2021, pp 180-195, DOI: 10.3280/SES2021-001013