Carsharing: Business models, and role of the decision maker

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Lucia Rotaris, Marko Bumbulovic
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 32 P. 63-94 Dimensione file 272 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2020-001005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Individuals’ mobility needs are constantly increasing both in urban and in less-densely popu-lated areas. Private transport activities are intensifying, creating unsustainable environmental pressure and absorbing a too large amount of resources, forcing to social exclusion the popu-lation segments which cannot bear the cost of private transport. Car sharing has proven to be a viable solution to alleviate at least partially these problems. Many different business models are used to provide the service. Organizational and technical innovations have changed the market, opening the supply to new providers and serving segments of the latent demand which were not reached by the traditional operators. The role played by the decision marker to sup-port the development of this market in its various forms has been essential and will still be crit-ical in order to guide a smooth transition from the private use of traditional vehicles to the shared use of autonomous ones. The purpose of this paper is to shed light on these changing characteristics of the carsharing market with a special focus on the Italian context.

Keywords:Carsharing, business models, innovation, transport policy.

Jel codes: R40, R41, R42, R48

  1. König D., Eckhardt J., Aapaoja A., Sochor J.L., Karlsson M. (2016). Business and operator models for MaaS. Deliverable 3 of the MAASiFiE project funded by CEDR -- http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/239795/local_239795.pdf.
  2. König M., Neumayr L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 44: 42-52.
  3. Lang N.S.L., Ruessmann M., Collie B.E., Wegscheider A.K., Moavenzadeh J., Loane M. (2018). Reshaping Urban Mobility with Autonomous Vehicles: Lessons from the City of Boston. World Economic Forum. -- http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Reshaping_Urban_Mobility_with_Autonomous_Vehicles_2018.pdf.
  4. Lindloff K., Pieper N., Bandelow N.C., Woisetschläger D.M. (2014). Drivers of carsharing diffusion in Germany: an actor-centred approach. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 14(3/4): 217-245.
  5. Meyer J., Becker H., Bösch P.M., Axhausen K.W. (2017). Autonomous vehicles: The next jump in accessibilities? Research in Transportation Economics, 62: 80-91.
  6. Moorthy A., De Kleine R., Keoleian G., Good J., Lewis G. (2017). Shared Autonomous Vehicles as a Sustainable Solution to the Last Mile Problem: A Case Study of Ann Arbor-Detroit Area. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars – Electronic and Electrical Systems, 10(2): 328-336. DOI: 10.4271/2017-01-1276
  7. Mounce R., Nelson J.D. (2019). On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120: 17-30.
  8. Wappelhorst S., Sauer M., Hinkeldein D., Bocherding A., Glaß T. (2014). Potential of electric carsharing in urban and rural areas. Transportation Research Procedia, 4: 374-386.
  9. Münzel K., Boon W., Frenken K., Vaskelainen T. (2018). Carsharing business models in Germany: characteristics, success and future prospects. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 16(2): 271-291.
  10. Münzel K., Boon W., Frenken K., Blomme J., van der Linden D. (2019). Explaining carsharing supply across Western European cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1-12.
  11. Narayanan S., Chaniotakis E., Antoniou C. (2020). Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111: 255-293.
  12. Penmetsa P., Adanu E.K., Wood D., Wang T., Jones S.L. (2019). Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles. A snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143: 9-13.
  13. Remane G., Nickerson R., Hanelt A., Tesch J.F., Kolbe L.M. (2016). A taxonomy of carsharing business models. Working Paper presented at the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin.
  14. Rodenbach J., Mathis J., Chicco A., Diana M. (2017) Car sharing in Europe: a multidimensional classification and inventory. -- www.stars-h2020.eu.
  15. Sarasini S., Langeland O. (2017). Business model innovation for car sharing and sustainable urban mobility. Working presented at the 8th International Sustainability Transitions Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden.
  16. Sarasini S., Sochor J., Arby H. (2017). What characterizes a sustainable MaaS business model. Working Paper presented at the 1st international conference on Mobility as a Service (ICOMaaS), Tampere.
  17. Schoettle B., Sivak M. (2014). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. Report No. UMTRI-2014-21 Transportation Research Institute, The University of Michigan, July -- https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/108384.
  18. Shaheen S., Cohen A., Jaffee M. (2018). Innovative mobility: Carsharing outlook. UC Berkeley Policy Brief. -- https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1mw8n13h.
  19. Shaheen S., Martin E., Bansal A. (2018). Peer-To-Peer (P2P) carsharing: Understanding early markets, social dynamics, and behavioral impacts. UC Berkeley Research Report. -- https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7s8207tb.
  20. Shen Y., Zhang H., Zhao J. (2018). Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: A supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113: 125-136.
  21. Shibayama T., Lemmerer H., Winder M., Pfaffenbichler P. (2013). Cooperative car sharing in small cities and scarcely populated rural area – an experiment in Austria. Institut für Verkehrswissenschaften, Technische Universität Wien.
  22. Sprei F., Ginnebaugh D. (2018). Unbundling cars to daily use and infrequent use vehicles – the potential role of car sharing. Energy Efficiency, 11(6): 1433-1447.
  23. Stocker A., Shaheen S. (2017). Shared automated vehicles: Review of business models, International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, No. 2017-09, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), International Transport Forum, Paris.
  24. Vij A. (2020). Understanding Consumer Demand for New Transport Technologies and Services, and Implications for the Future of Mobility. In Biloria N. (Ed.). Data-driven Multivalence in the Built Environment (pp. 91-107). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
  25. von Mörner M. (2019). Demand-oriented mobility solutions for rural areas using autonomous vehicles. Autonomous Vehicles and Future Mobility, 43.
  26. Juschten M., Ohnmacht T., Thao V.T., Gerike R., Hössinger R. (2019). Carsharing in Switzerland: identifying new markets by predicting membership based on data on supply and demand. Transportation, 46(4): 1171-1194.
  27. Jorge D., Correia G. (2013). Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: a literature review. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(3): 201-220.
  28. Illgen S., Höck M. (2018). Establishing car sharing services in rural areas: a simulation-based fleet operations analysis. Transportation, 47(2): 811-826.
  29. Hyland M., Mahmassani H.S. (2020). Operational benefits and challenges of shared-ride automated mobility-on-demand services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134: 251-270.
  30. Hyland M.F., Mahmassani H.S. (2017). Taxonomy of shared autonomous vehicle fleet management problems to inform future transportation mobility. Transportation Research Record, 2653(1): 26-34. DOI: 10.3141/2653-04
  31. Gleeson B., Randolph B. (2002). Social disadvantage and planning in the Sydney context. Urban Policy and Research, 20(1): 101-107. DOI: 10.1080/08111140220131636
  32. Gkartzonikas C., Gkritza K. (2019). What have we learned? A review of stated preference and choice studies on autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98: 323-337.
  33. Fagnant D.J., Kockelman K.M. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40: 1-13.
  34. Erich M. (2018). Car sharing unlocked ING Economics Department Working Paper. -- https://think.ing.com/uploads/reports/ING_-_Car_sharing_unlocked.pdf.
  35. Eckhardt J., Nykänen L., Aapaoja A., Niemi P. (2018). MaaS in rural areas-case Finland. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 27: 75-83.
  36. Durand A., Harms L., Hoogendoorn-Lanser S., Zijlstra T. (2018). Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review. KiM Netherlands Institute for Transport Policy Analysis. -- http://english.kimnet.nl.
  37. Donati A., Petracchini F., Gasparini C., Tomassetti L. (2019). Politiche di mobilità e qualità dell’aria nelle 14 città e aree metropolitane 2017-2018. II Rapporto Kyoto Club – CNR-IIA in collaborazione con OPMUS ISFORT. -- https://www.kyotoclub.org/medialibrary/LibroMOB2019_digital_sm.pdf.
  38. Degirmenci K., Lapin S., Breitner M.H. (2017). Critical success factors of carsharing and electric carsharing: findings from expert interviews in Continental Europe. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 17(3): 294-315.
  39. Daniels R., Mulley C. (2012). Flexible transport services: Overcoming barriers to implementation in low-density urban areas. Urban Policy and Research, 30(1): 59-76. DOI: 10.1080/08111146.2012.660872
  40. Currie G., Richardson T., Smyth P., Vella-Brodrick D., Hine J., Lucas K., Stanley J. (2010). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne. Updated results. Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1): 287-295.
  41. Cohen B., Kietzmann J. (2014). Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy, Organization & Environment, 27(3): 279-296. DOI: 10.1177/1086026614546199
  42. Ciuffini R., Orsini O.L., Barbieri G., Gargani G., Massari S. (2019). III rapporto nazionale sulla sharing mobility. Osservatorio Sharing Mobility. -- www.osservatoriosharingmobility.it.
  43. Ciuffini R., Gentili V., Milioni D., Refrigeri L., Rossi G., Soprano L., Squitieri F. (2018). II rapporto nazionale sulla sharing mobility, Osservatorio Sharing Mobility. -- www.osservatoriosharing mobility.it.
  44. Cheyne C., Imran M. (2016). Shared transport: Reducing energy demand and enhancing transport options for residents of small towns. Energy Research & Social Science, 18: 139-150.
  45. Chavan S.P. (2020). Public Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles (AV): A Review. In Pawar P.M., Ronge B.P., Balasubramaniam R., Vibhute A.S., Apte S.S. (Eds.). Techno-Societal 2018 (pp. 739-750). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
  46. Böhler S., Wanner M. (2004). Perspektiven für Car-Sharing in Klein-und Mittelstädten sowie ländlich geprägten Regionen. Verkehrssystem-und Mobilitätsmanagement im ländlichen Raum, 105.
  47. Becker H., Ciari F., Axhausen K.W. (2018). Measuring the car ownership impact of free-floating car-sharing. A case study in Basel, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65: 51-62.
  48. Becker H., Ciari F., Axhausen K.W. (2017). Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 97: 17-29.
  49. Aapaoja A., Eckhardt J., Nykänen L. (2017). Business models for MaaS. In 1st International Conference on Mobility as a Service (ICoMaaS), 28-29 November 2017, Tampere, Finland. Tampere University of Technology, Finland.

Lucia Rotaris, Marko Bumbulovic, Carsharing: Business models, and role of the decision maker in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2020, pp 63-94, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2020-001005