Why donate stem cells? A pilot validation of new measures for studying antecedents of stem cell donation intention

Titolo Rivista RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Autori/Curatori Flavia Bonaiuto, Uberta Ganucci Cancellieri, Silvia Ariccio, Erica Molinario, Luca Pierelli, Marino Bonaiuto
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 35 P. 599-633 Dimensione file 369 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2020-002007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Social sciences literature on stem cells one of the most promising research venues in biomedical sciences is fragmented and lacks standard tools. This paper aims at presenting a first pilot validation of some stem cells-relevant social-psychological constructs’ scales and an exploration of variables related bone marrow stem cells and umbilical cord blood stem cells donation intention. Eight scales were created for measuring the following variables: subjective knowledge on stem cells donation; objective knowledge on stem cells donation; attitudes toward stem cells donation; past tissue donation experience; positive incentives toward stem cells donation; negative incentives toward stem cells donation; intention of stem cells donation; importance of stem cells sustainabil-ity. A self-report questionnaire including new scales and existing scales from literature (norms, values, emotions) was administrated to 78 Italian subjects. Fac-torial structures were explored via factorial analyses with Principal Axis Factor-ing, Oblimin rotation and Cronbach’s alpha tests. Two stepwise regression anal-yses were conducted to explore which variables are more related to the two kinds of donation intention. Most scales have been found to have a satisfacto-ry factorial structure and internal consistency (a>.60). Both kinds of donation intention have been found to be associated to self-transcendence values and positive emotions; bone marrow stem cells donation intention is also associated to conservation values, subjective knowledge, and past tissue donation experi-ence. Results are discussed according to current literature and suggesting re-search developments.

Keywords:Altruism, stem cells, donation, donoridentity, social-psychological tools.

  1. Mansori, S., Sambasivan, M., & Md-Sidin, S. (2015). Acceptance of novel products: The role of religiosity, ethnicity and values. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(1), 39-66.
  2. McCullough, J., Rogers, G., Dahl, R., Therkelsen, D., Kamstra, L., Crisham, P., ... & Williams, J. (1986). Development and operation of a program to obtain volunteer bone marrow donors unrelated to the patient. Transfusion, 26(4), 315-323.
  3. Morgan, S.E., & Miller, J.K. (2002). Beyond the organ donor card: The effect of knowledge, attitudes, and values on willingness to communicate about organ donation to family members. Health communication, 14(1), 121-134.
  4. Narayanan, P., Wolanskyj, A., Ehlers, S.L., Litzow, M.R., Patnaik, M.S., Hogan, W.J., & Hashmi, S.K. (2016). Medical students’ knowledge, familiarity, and attitudes towards hematopoietic stem cell donation: stem cell donation behaviours. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 22(9), 1710-1716.
  5. Natan, M.B., Grinberg, K., Galula, S., & Biton, M. (2014). Factors Affecting Israeli Women’s Decision Whether to Donate Cord Blood. The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 39(2), 96-101. DOI: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000014
  6. Panasonic Healthcare Company of North America (2013). Ultra-Low and Cryogenic Freezers. Wood Dale, IL: AG.
  7. Robinson, M.A. (2018). Using multi-item psychometric scales for research and practice in human resource management. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 739-750.
  8. Sarason, I.G., Sarason, B.R., Slichter, S.J., Beatty, P.G., Meyer, D.M., & Bolgiano, D.C. (1993). Increasing participation of blood donors in a bone-marrow registry. Health Psychology, 12(4), 272-276. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.12.4.272
  9. Screnci, M., Murgi, E., Pirrè, G., Valente, E., Gesuiti, P., Corona, F., & Girelli, G. (2012). Donating umbilical cord blood to a public bank or storing it in a private bank: Knowledge and preference of blood donors and of pregnant women. Blood Transfusion, 10(3), 331-337. DOI: 10.2450/2012.0081-11
  10. Shin, S., Yoon, J.H., Lee, H.R., Kim, B.J., & Roh, E.Y. (2011). Perspectives of potential donors on cord blood and cord blood cryopreservation: a survey of highly educated, pregnant Korean women receiving active prenatal care. Transfusion, 51(2), 277-283.
  11. Siegel, J.T., Navarro, M.A., Tan, C.N., & Hyde, M.K. (2014). Attitude-behaviour consistency, the principle of compatibility, and organ donation: A classic innovation. Health Psychology, 33(9), 1084-1091.
  12. Simmons, R.G., Schimmel, M., & Butterworth, V.A. (1993). The Self-Image of Unrelated Bone Marrow Donors. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 34(4), 285. DOI: 10.2307/213736
  13. Studts, J.L., Ruberg, J.L., McGuffin, S.A., & Roetzer, L.M. (2010). Decisions to register for the National Marrow Donor Program: rational vs emotional appeals. Bone marrow transplantation, 45(3), 422.
  14. Switzer, G.E., Myaskovsky, L., Goycoolea, J.M., Dew, M.A., Confer, D.L., & King, R. (2003). Factors associated with ambivalence about bone marrow donation among newly recruited unrelated potential donors. Transplantation, 75(9), 1517-1523.
  15. Switzer, G.E., Simmons, R.G., & Dew, M.A. (1996). Helping Unrelated Strangers: Physical and Psychological Reactions to the Bone Marrow Donation Process Among Anonymous Donors1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(6), 469-490.
  16. Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J.W., & Steg, L. (2015). Acting green elicits a literal warm glow. Nature Climate Change, 5(1), 37.
  17. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  18. Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigne, E., Aldas-Manzano, J., & Curras-Perez, R. (2017). A Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Following the Sustainable Development Paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 243-262.
  19. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The economic journal, 100(401), 464-477. DOI: 10.2307/2234133
  20. Atala A. & Lanza R.P. (2013). Handbook of Stem Cells. London, Academic/Elsevier.
  21. Bart, T., Volken, T., Fischer, Y., & Mansouri Taleghani, B. (2014). Giving Blood and Enrolling on the SC Donor Registry: Ranking of Obstacles and Motives in Switzerland. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 41(4), 264-272. DOI: 10.1159/000365457
  22. Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S.H. (2005). La misura dei valori: Un contributo alla validazione del Portrait Values Questionnaire su un campione italiano. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 246, 29-41.
  23. Danzer, E., Holzgreve, W., Troeger, C., Kostka, U., Steimann, S., Bitzer, J., & Surbek, D.V. (2003). Attitudes of Swiss mothers toward unrelated umbilical cord blood banking 6 months after donation. Transfusion, 43(5), 604-608.
  24. European Commission (2015). Special Eurobarometer 426 “Blood and Cell and Tissue Donation” Report. European Union.
  25. Evans, R., & Ferguson, E. (2014). Defining and measuring blood donor altruism: a theoretical approach from biology, economics and psychology. Vox Sanguinis, 106(2), 118–126.
  26. Fernandez, C.V., Gordon, K., Van den Hof, M., Taweel, S., & Baylis, F. (2003). Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women with regard to collection, testing and banking of cord blood SC. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 168(6), 695-698.
  27. Flückiger, A. (Ed.). (2010). Emouvoir et persuader pour promouvoir le don d’organes?: l’efficacité entre éthique et droit. Geneva, Zurich and Basel: Schulthess.
  28. Fornara, F., Carrus, G., Passafaro, P., & Bonnes, M. (2011). Distinguishing the sources of normative influence on pro-environmental behaviours: The role of local norms in household waste recycling. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 623-635. DOI: 10.1177/1368430211408149
  29. Galanis, P.A, Sparos L.D., Katostaras T., Velonakis, E., & Kalokerinou, A. (2008). Factors that influence Greeks’ decision to register as potential bone marrow donors. Transplantation Proc, 40, 1271-1274.
  30. Garcia, M.C., Chapman, J.R., Shaw, P.J., Gottlieb, D.J., Ralph, A., Craig, J. C., & Tong, A. (2013). Motivations, Experiences, and Perspectives of Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Donors: Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 19(7), 1046-1058.
  31. Giles, M. (2004). An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to blood donation: the importance of self-efficacy. Health Education Research, 19(4), 380-391.
  32. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R., E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Ed.). Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey.
  33. Hodges, R.J., Bardien, N., &Wallace, E. (2012). Acceptability of SC Therapy by Pregnant Women. Birth, 39(2), 91-97.
  34. Hyde, M.K., & White, K.M. (2013). Testing an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict young people’s intentions to join a bone marrow donor registry. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(12), 2462-2467.
  35. Hyde, M.K., Knowles, S.R., & White, K.M. (2013). Donating blood and organs: using an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective to identify similarities and differences in individual motivations to donate. Health Education Research, 28(6), 1092-1104.
  36. Hyde, M.K., Mclaren, P.J., & White, K.M. (2014). Identifying belief targets to increase bone marrow registry participation among students who have never donated blood. Psychology, health & medicine, 19(1), 115-125. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2013.775467
  37. James, A.B., Schreiber, G.B., Hillyer, C.D., & Shaz, B.H. (2013). Blood donations motivators and barriers: A descriptive study of African American and white voters. Transfusion and Apheresis Science, 48(1), 87-93.
  38. Jordens, C.F., Kerridge, I.H., Stewart, C.L., O’brien, T.A., Samuel, G., Porter, M., ... & Nassar, N. (2014). Knowledge, Beliefs, and Decisions of Pregnant Australian Women Concerning Donation and Storage of Umbilical Cord Blood: A Population‐Based Survey. Birth, 41(4), 360-366.
  39. Karagiorgou, L.Z., Pantazopoulou, M.N., Mainas, N.C., Beloukas A.I., & Kriebardis, A.G. (2014). Knowledge about umbilical cord blood banking among Greek citizens. Blood Transfus, 12(1), 353-360. DOI: 10.2450/2013.0297-12
  40. Katz, G., Mills, A., Garcia, J., Hooper, K., McGuckin, C., Platz, A., ... & Torrabadella, M. (2011). Banking cord blood stem cells: attitude and knowledge of pregnant women in five European countries. Transfusion, 51(3), 578-586.
  41. Kim, M., Han, S., & Shin, M. (2015). Influencing factors on the cord-blood donation of post-partum women. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(2), 269-275.
  42. Kline, P. (2000). Handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  43. Kwok, J., Leung, E., Wong, W., Leung, K., Lee, C.K., Lam, W., & Ip, P. (2015). Factors Influencing Hematopoietic SC Donation Intention in Hong Kong: A Web-Based Survey. Ann Transplant, 20, 604-613. DOI: 10.12659/AOT.894165
  44. Lye, J.L., Soon, L.K., Wan Ahmad, W.A.N., & Tan, S.C. (2015). Knowledge and Attitude about Stem Cells and Their Application in Medicine among Nursing Students in Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, 22(4), 23-31.
  45. Mannheimer, R., & Brunelli, C. (2013). Cellule staminali: cosa ne sanno gli italiani? Quali opportunità? Sondaggio ISPO Ricerche per Assobiotec. Conference held in Rome, Palazzo Montecitorio 14/11/13.
  46. Terracciano, A., McCrae, R., & Costa Jr, P.T. (2003). Factorial and Construct Validity of The Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 19(2), 131-141. DOI: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131
  47. Toccaceli, V., Fagnani, C., Nisticò, L., D’Ippolito, C., Giannantonio, L., Brescianini, S., & Stazi, M.A. (2009). Research understanding, attitude and awareness towards biobanking: a survey among Italian twin participants to a genetic epidemiological study. BMC Med Ethics, 10(1). DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-10-4
  48. Tronu, G. (2011). General environmental attitudes and beliefs influencing sustainable behaviour: The NHIP scale and the spatial bias. Unpublished PhD Dissertation.
  49. Venhoeven, L.A., Bolderdijk, J.W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: how pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5(4), 1372-1386.
  50. Verplanken B., & Holland R.W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 434-447. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434
  51. Wu, A.M.S., Tang, C.S., & Yogo, M. (2013). Death anxiety, altruism, self-efficacy, and organ donation intention among Japanese college students: A moderated mediation analysis. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(2), 115-123.
  52. Retrieved from https://www.cryoport.com/resources/supporting-sustainability-with
-smart-cold-chain-logistics.

  • Stay at home behavior during COVID-19: The role of person-home relationships Silvia Ariccio, Annalisa Theodorou, in Journal of Environmental Psychology 102334/2024 pp.102334
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102334
  • Problematic donation procedures vs. futuristic research and treatment applications: A dichotomous social representation of stem cells in Italy Silvia Ariccio, Uberta Ganucci Cancellieri, Flavia Bonaiuto, Roberto Fasanelli, Ida Galli, Luca Pierelli, Marino Bonaiuto, in European Review of Applied Psychology 100763/2022 pp.100763
    DOI: 10.1016/j.erap.2022.100763

Flavia Bonaiuto, Uberta Ganucci Cancellieri, Silvia Ariccio, Erica Molinario, Luca Pierelli, Marino Bonaiuto, Why donate stem cells? A pilot validation of new measures for studying antecedents of stem cell donation intention in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2020, pp 599-633, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2020-002007