The "Real" Impact Factor: Reflections on the Impact of the Research Excellence Framework

Titolo Rivista FINANCIAL REPORTING
Autori/Curatori Jane Broadbent
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 14 P. 15-28 Dimensione file 173 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2016-001002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper is an argument for the importance of academics undertaking some (but not only) research that relates to the practical issues faced by practitioners and policy makers and that is geared to achieving impact. It offers a normative argument informed by my experience as a practitioner and an academic and by my experiences in the assessment of impact as part of the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) in 2014. The paper introduces the nature of the REF and how it was implemented. It also addresses the implications of the performance measurement of impact of REF for Higher Educational Institutions and the individual academics that work within them. In that respect it recognises that performance measures give extrinsic encouragement to particular behaviours. The paper argues that academics should also be intrinsically driven to research that has impact. In order to achieve impact, the paper suggests that we should not see a gap between academics and practitioners, but should instead see practice and academic endeavour as different but complementary elements of the same profession. We should seek to develop better discourses between academics and practitioners and should not attribute greater importance to the views of either party. Instead we should have an engagement that is open to the generation of disagreement as well as agreement but that nevertheless does not see disagreement as the basis for closing down communication.

Parole chiave:Research impact, engagement, evidence for policymakers and practitioners, Research Excellence Framework

  • Can “publishing game” pressures affect the research topic choice? A survey of European accounting researchers Paola Ramassa, Francesco Avallone, Alberto Quagli, in Journal of Management and Governance /2024 pp.507
    DOI: 10.1007/s10997-023-09667-8
  • Performance Measurement and Management Control: The Relevance of Performance Measurement and Management Control Research Ann Martin-Sardesai, James Guthrie, pp.221 (ISBN:978-1-78756-470-1)
  • Public university research engagement contradictions in a commercialising higher education world Lee D Parker, in Financial Accountability & Management /2024 pp.16
    DOI: 10.1111/faam.12341
  • History of research performance measurement systems in the Australian higher education sector Ann Martin-Sardesai, James Guthrie, Stuart Tooley, Sally Chaplin, in Accounting History /2019 pp.40
    DOI: 10.1177/1032373218768559
  • The Ethical and Behavioral Factors Influencing Research Topic Selection in Accounting: A Behavioral Approach from the Perspective of the Publishing Game Gholamreza Kordestani, Hossein Rajabdorri, in journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting /2025 pp.301
    DOI: 10.61186/aapc.9.18.301
  • Academic evidence, policy and practice Jane Broadbent, in Public Money & Management /2017 pp.233
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2017.1291219

Jane Broadbent, The "Real" Impact Factor: Reflections on the Impact of the Research Excellence Framework in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2016, pp 15-28, DOI: 10.3280/FR2016-001002