From Beveridge to "Flexicurity": Old and Recent Labour Policies

Titolo Rivista HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Autori/Curatori Ioannis A. Katselidis
Anno di pubblicazione 2014 Fascicolo 2014/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 19 P. 97-115 Dimensione file 868 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2014-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The modern labour market policy of flexicurity has been adopted as a leitmotiv of the European employment strategy and the revised Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs. This paper examines the two main influences behind the concept of flexicurity, namely the New Keynesian active labour market policies and the early ideas of William Beveridge. In particular, we contend that the flexicurity agenda originated from the New Keynesian employment policy agenda, which incorporates active measures for employment, aiming at both flexibility and security in the labour markets. These ideas and proposals can be traced back to William Beveridge’s work on labour market policy. Beveridge proposed a progressive and forward-looking labour policy, which combined flexibility and security together with active labour market measures, without disregarding the weaker labourers’ groups (e.g. casual workers). Thus, the paper shows that his policy proposition resembles the modern policy concept of flexicurity in such a degree that we can characterize Beveridge as the precursor of the flexicurity phenomenon.

Keywords:Beveridge, New Keynesianism, labour policy, labour market functioning, flexicurity

Jel codes:B31, E12, J08

  1. Harris J. (1997[1977]). William Beveridge: A Biography, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  2. Heath J.St.G. (1911). Underemployment and the Mobility of Labour, Economic Journal, 21 (82): 202-21.
  3. Hobson J.A. (1896). The Problem of the Unemployed: An Enquiry and an Economic Policy, London, Methuen & Co.
  4. Hutchison T.W. (1975[1953]). A Review of Economic Doctrines, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  5. Harris J. (1996). From Sunspots to Social Welfare: the Unemployment Problem 1870-1914. In Corry (ed.)(1996): 52-68.
  6. Harris J. (1972). Unemployment and Politics: A Study in English Social Policy 1886-1914, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  7. Gordon R. (1990). What is New Keynesian Economics?, Journal of Economic Literature, 28 (September): 241-57.
  8. Giddens A. (ed.)(2001). The Global Third Way Debate, Cambridge, Polity Press.
  9. Garraty J.A. (1978). Unemployment in History: Economic Thought and Public Policy, New York, Harper & Row.
  10. Ferrera M., A. Hemerijck and M. Rhodes (2001). The Future of Social Europe: Recasting Work and Welfare in the New Economy. In Giddens (ed.)(2001): 114-133.
  11. European Commission (2007b). Communication from the Commission to the Spring European Council. Strategic Report on the Renewed Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs: Launching the New Cycle (2008-2010), Brussels.
  12. European Commission (2007a). Towards Common Principles of Flexicurity: More and Better Jobs through Flexibility and Security, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit D.2, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  13. European Commission (2006). Employment in Europe 2006, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit D.1, Brussels.
  14. European Commission (2005). Communication to the Spring European Council: Integrated Guidelines fort Growth and Jobs (2005-2008), Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  15. Dimand R.W. (1999b). The Beveridge Retort: Beveridge’s Response to the Keynesian Challenge. In Pasinetti and Schefold (eds): 221-239.
  16. Dimand R.W. (1999a). Beveridge on Unemployment and Cycles before the General Theory, History of Economic Ideas, VII (3): 33-51.
  17. Corry B. (ed.)(1996). Unemployment and the Economists, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  18. Chung H. (2007). Flexibility, but for Whom?: A New Approach to Examining Labour Market Flexibility across Europe Using Company Level Data, MPRA Paper, No. 2397. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2397/ [accessed 29 January 2014].
  19. Bredgaard T. and F. Larsen (eds.)(2005). Employment Policy from Different Angles, Copenhagen, DJØF Publishing.
  20. Booth C. (1902). Life and Labour of the People of London, Vols I and XVII, London, Macmillan.
  21. Beveridge W.H. (1955[1953]). Power and Influence, New York, The Beechhurst Press.
  22. Beveridge W.H. (1944). Full Employment in a Free Society, London, George Allen & Unwin.
  23. Beveridge W.H. (1909 & 1930). Unemployment: A Problem of Industry, London, Longmans.
  24. Backhouse R.E. and T. Nishizawa (eds)(2010). No Wealth But Life: Welfare Economics and the Welfare State in Britain, 1880-1945, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  25. Backhouse R.E. (1985). A History of Modern Economic Analysis, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
  26. Auer P. (2007). Security in Labour markets: Combining Flexibility with Security for Decent Work, Economic and Labor Market Papers, 2007/12, Geneva, ILO.
  27. Ashiagbor D. (2005). The European Employment Strategy: Labour Market Regulation and New Government, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  28. Alden P. (1905). The Unemployed: A National Question, London, King & Son.
  29. Jackman R., C. Pissarides, and S. Savouri (1990). Labour Market Policies and Unemployment in the OECD, Economic Policy, 5 (11): 449-90.
  30. Klammer U. (2004). Flexicurity in a Life-course Perspective, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 282-99. DOI: 10.1177/102425890401000210
  31. Komine A. (2001). Beveridge on Unemployment in 1909: Three Inflows and Outflows, Niigata Sangyo University, Discussion Paper Series, No. 21, March. Available at http://www.econ.ryukoku.ac.jp/~komine/hope/dp21.pdf [accessed 10 February 2014].
  32. Komine A. (2004). The Making of Beveridge’s Unemployment (1909): Three Concepts Blended, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 11 (2): 255-80.
  33. Komine A. (2010). Beveridge on a Welfare Society: An Integration of his Trilogy. In Backhouse and Nishizawa (eds)(2010): 207-19.
  34. Layard R., S. Nickell, and R. Jackman (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  35. Lindbeck A., (1996). The West European Employment Problem, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 132 (4): 609-37.
  36. Madsen P.K. (2004).The Danish Model of “Flexicurity”: Experiences and Lessons, Transfer. European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 187-207.
  37. Madsen P.K. (2005). The Danish Road to Flexicurity: Where Are We? And How Did We Get There?. In Bredgaard and Larsen (eds.)(2005): 269-290.
  38. Marcuzzo M.C. (2010). Whose Welfare State? Beveridge versus Keynes. In Backhouse and Nishizawa (eds.)(2010): 189-206.
  39. MacGregor D. H. (1907). Labour Exchange and Unemployment, Economic Journal, 17 (4), December: 585-89.
  40. Mansfield M. (1992). Labour Exchanges and the Labour Reserve in Turn of the Century Social Reform, Journal of Social Policy, 21 (4): 435-68.
  41. Nickell S., L. Nunziata and W. Ochel (2005). Unemployment in the OECD since the 1960s. What Do We Know?, Economic Journal, 115 (500): 1-27.
  42. Parker H. (1989). Instead of the Dole: An Enquiry into Integration of the Tax and Benefit Systems, London, Routledge.
  43. Phelps O.W. (1955[1950]). Introduction to Labor Economics, New York, McGraw-Hill.
  44. Polus E. (2005). Flexibility, Security and Social Cohesion from the Viewpoint of Employment Policy, Ministry of Labour, Finland.
  45. Romer D. (1993). The New Keynesian Synthesis, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (1): 6-14.
  46. Rutherford M. (2007). American Institutionalism and its British Connections, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 14 (2): 291-323. DOI: 10.1080/09672560701327984
  47. Scarpetta S. (1996). Assessing the Role of Labour Market Policies and Institutional Settings on Unemployment: A Cross Country Study, OECD Economic Studies, 26: 43-98.
  48. Schmid G. and B. Gazier (eds.)(2002). The Dynamics of Full Employment: Social Integration through Transitional Labour Markets, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  49. Snowdon B. and H.R. Vane (2005). Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development and Current State, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  50. Tangian A. (2005). Monitoring Flexicurity Policies in the EU with Dedicated Composite Indicators, Invited paper for presentation at the European Commission (DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities), Brussels, March. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/10419/21581/1/p_wsi_diskp_137.pdf [accessed 12 February 2014].
  51. Teague P. (1994). Employment Policy in the European Union: Between New Keynesianism and Deregulation, Journal of European Public Policy, 1 (3): 315-45.
  52. Wilthagen T. and R. Rogowski (2002). The Legal Regulation of Transitional Labour Markets. In Schmid and Gazier (eds.)(2002): 233-73.
  53. Wilthagen T. and F. Tros (2004). The Concept of “Flexicurity”: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 10 (2): 166-186. DOI: 10.1177/102425890401000204
  54. Winch D. (1969). Economics and Policy: A Historical Study, London, Hodder and Stoughton.
  55. Teague P. (1999). Economic Citizenship in the European Union: Employment Relations in the New Europe, London, Routledge.
  56. Webb S. and B. Webb (1911). The Prevention of Destitution, London, Longmans, Green.

Ioannis A. Katselidis, From Beveridge to "Flexicurity": Old and Recent Labour Policies in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 1/2014, pp 97-115, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2014-001004