Competing Futures: Reconfiguring Sustainability in US Education Policy from Equity to Meritocracy

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Bronwen Hughes, Mariam Maisuradze, Margaret Rasulo
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/1Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 53-68 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/riss2025oa19846
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study examines how inclusion is discursively constructed in sustainability-oriented educational policies through a linguistic analysis of six Executive Orders issued by former President Biden during his 2021-2025 administration, and by Donald Trump during the first month of his current presidency, January 2025. Drawing upon a critical discourse perspective and employing the tools provided by Systemic Functional Linguistics, we explore representations of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in order to assess how vulnerability, participation, and exclusion are linguistically framed in the field of education. The findings will contribute to understanding how institutional discourse shapes inclusive education and sustainability, informing strategies for future equitable learning environments.

This study examines how inclusion is discursively constructed in sustainability-oriented educational policies through a linguistic analysis of six Executive Orders issued by former President Biden during his 2021-2025 administration, and by Donald Trump during the first month of his current presidency, January 2025. Drawing upon a critical discourse perspective and employing the tools provided by Systemic Functional Linguistics, we explore representations of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in order to assess how vulnerability, participation, and exclusion are linguistically framed in the field of education. The findings will contribute to understanding how institutional discourse shapes inclusive education and sustainability, informing strategies for future equitable learning environments.

Parole chiave:; DEI; Sustainability; Transitivity Analysis; Educational Policy; Appraisal

  1. Apple M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). Routledge Falmer.
  2. Armstrong D., Gosling A., Weinman J., and Marteau T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3): 597-606.
  3. Ball S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.
  4. Bhatia V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. Continuum.
  5. Bonilla-Silva E. (2010). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
  6. Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood Press.
  7. Bourdieu P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press.
  8. Bourdieu P. and Passeron J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. Sage Publications.
  9. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Publications Office of the European Union. -- https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4299f1a0-4b27-4e6a-9b4b-bb5e1f714d44.
  10. Gewirtz S. (2001). Cloning the Blairs: New Labour’s programme for the re-socialisation of working-class parents. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4): 365-378.
  11. Halliday M. A. K. and Matthiessen C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
  12. Halliday M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (1st ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  13. Ladson-Billings G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7): 3-12.
  14. Lareau A. (2003). Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life. University of California Press.
  15. Martin J. R. and White P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Mayer K. R. (2001). With the stroke of a pen: Executive orders and presidential power. Princeton University Press.
  17. Orfield G. (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation. Harvard Civil Rights Project. -- https://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu.
  18. Reay D. (2004). Education and cultural capital: The implications of changing trends in education policies. Cultural Trends, 13(2): 73-86.
  19. Samuels A. (2025). Executive Orders and the rollback of federal education: Trump’s EO 14151. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 33(4): 22-34.
  20. Schmidt P. (2007). Conservative groups attack colleges’ efforts to promote diversity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(2): A1-A10.

Bronwen Hughes, Mariam Maisuradze, Margaret Rasulo, Competing Futures: Reconfiguring Sustainability in US Education Policy from Equity to Meritocracy in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1Suppl./2025, pp 53-68, DOI: 10.3280/riss2025oa19846