A Reflection on the Connections between Art, Sport, Community and Tokyo 2020

Titolo Rivista WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
Autori/Curatori Devena Haggis
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2023/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 19 P. 39-57 Dimensione file 649 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2023-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The connections between sport and art have long been evident. In the ancient Olympics art and education played an important role within the holistic development of the mind and body and in the pursuit of physical, social, and educa-tional excellence. Art provided a connection between sport and the community. These connections are present today and reflect the tangible and intangible as-pects of the modern mega-event. This paper will outline some of the participatory practices connected with art, sport and the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games and Para-lympic Games and reflect on art as a means of engaging the community with the event. Reflected in the sport vs art dichotomy, positive and negative legacies as-sociated with the Olympic Games are not merely competition based but reflect the myriad interactions of the host and international community with the event.

Le connessioni tra sport e arte sono state a lungo evidenti. Nelle antiche Olim-piadi l’arte e l’educazione giocavano un ruolo importante nello sviluppo olistico della mente e del corpo e nella ricerca dell’eccellenza fisica, sociale ed educati-va. L’arte forniva un collegamento tra lo sport e la comunità. Queste connessioni sono ancora oggi presenti e riflettono gli aspetti tangibili e intangibili del mega-evento moderno. Questo documento illustrerà alcune delle pratiche partecipative legate all’arte, allo sport e ai Giochi Olimpici e Paralimpici di Tokyo 2020 e ri-fletterà sull’arte come mezzo per coinvolgere la comunità nell’evento. Riflessa nella dicotomia sport vs arte, le eredità positive e negative associate ai Giochi Olimpici non sono semplicemente basate sulla competizione, ma riflettono la mi-riade di interazioni della comunità ospitante e internazionale con l’evento.

Keywords:Tokyo 2020; Giochi olimpici; Arte; Interazione con la comunità, Eredità.

  1. Andrews W. (2020). Playful Protests and Contested Urban Space: the 2020 Tokyo Olympics Protest Movement. The Asia Pacific Journal, 18(5): 1-11.
  2. Asahi Newspaper (2021). Survey: 83% against holding Tokyo Olympics this summer. -- Available at: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/14351670#:~:text=A%20total%20 of%.2083%20%20Asahi%20Shimbun%20survey%20showed, (accessed 2023.05.30).
  3. Battley B., Daniels E. and Rolan G. (2014). Archives as multifaceted narratives: linking the ‘touchstones’ of community memory. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(2): 155-157. DOI: 10.1080/01576895.2014.911675
  4. Baumberger C. (2013). Art and understanding. Defence of Aesthetic. Cognitivism. In: Greenlee M. et al., editors, Bilder sehen. Perspektiven der Bildwissenschaft. Regensburg: Schnell & Steiner.
  5. Boykoff J. (2011). The Anti-Olympics. New Left Review, 67: 41-59.
  6. Boykoff J. and Gaffney C. (2020). The Tokyo 2020 Games and the End of Olympic History. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 31(2): 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10455752.2020.1738053
  7. Brown D. (2001). Modern Sport, Modernism and the Cultural Manifesto: De Coubertin's Revue Olympique. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 18(2): 78-109. DOI: 10.1080/714001553
  8. Buijs A.E., Mattijssen T.J., Van der Jagt A.P., Ambrose-Oji B., Andersson E., Elands B.H. and Møller M.S. (2016). Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22: 1-6.
  9. Cano-Martínez M.J., Carrasco M., Sandoval J. and González-Martín C. (2023). Quantitative Analysis of Visual Representation of Sign Elements in COVID-19 Context. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 41(1): 31-51. DOI: 10.1177/02762374221104059
  10. Cassini L. (2022). Sport as Cultural Heritage. In: Nafziger J.A.R. and Gauthier R., editors, Handbook on International Sports Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
  11. Chen C., Takahashi T. and Yang S. (2015). Remembrance of happy things past: positive autobiographical memories are intrinsically rewarding and valuable, but not in depression. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 222.
  12. Chiavacci D. and Wieczorek I. (2023). Tokyo Olympics 2020: Between dream and contention. Contemporary Japan, 35(1): 3-15. DOI: 10.1080/18692729.2023.2195312
  13. Craith M.N. and Kockel U. (2015). (Re‐) Building Heritage: Integrating Tangible and Intangible. In: Logan W., Craith M.N. and Kockel U., editors, A Companion to Heritage Studies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Desai D. (2020). Educating for Social Change Through Art: A Personal Reckoning. Studies in Art Education. A Journal of Issues and Research, 61(1): 10-23.
  15. Gieryn T.F. (2000). A Space for Place in Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 463-496. -- Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/223453.
  16. Griswold W. (1987). A methodological framework for the sociology of culture. Sociological Methodology, 17: 1-35.
  17. Harrison R. and Rose D. (2010). Intangible Heritage. In: Benton T., editor, Understanding Heritage and Memory. UK: Manchester University Press.
  18. Harvey D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review 53. -- Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii53/articles/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city, (accessed 2023.6 20).
  19. Horne J. and Whannel G. (2020). Understanding the Olympics. London: Routledge.
  20. Inglis D. (2008) Culture agonistes: social differentiation, cultural policy and Cultural Olympiads. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(4): 463-477. DOI: 10.1080/10286630802445955
  21. International Olympic Academy (2019). The Legacy of the Ancient Olympic Games. -- Available at: https://ioa.org.gr/the-legacy-of-ancient-olympic-games/, (accessed 2023.1.31).
  22. International Olympic Committee (2023). Tokyo 2020: The Medals. -- Available at: https://olympics.com/en/olympic-games/tokyo-2020/medal-design, (accessed 2023. 01.29).
  23. International Olympic Committee (2021a). Olympic Charter. -- Available at: https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/General/EN-OlympicCharter.pdf?_ga=2.23402234.1998167419.16855846041526613180. 16837197 56, (accessed 2023.5.29).
  24. International Olympic Committee (2021b). New data shows no COVID-19 spread between Tokyo 2020 participants and local population. -- Available at: https://olympics.com/ioc/news/new-data-shows-no-covid-19-spread-between-tokyo-2020-participants-and-local-population, (accessed 2023.05.30).
  25. Japan Anti-Doping Agency (n.d.). Play True 2020. -- Available at: https://playtrue2020-sp4t.jp/iplaytrue, (accessed 2023.02.15).
  26. Japan Kocarina Association (2020). Kokarina to Orinpikku [Kokarina and the Oympics]. -- Available at: https://www.kocarina-k.or.jp/olimpic/, (accessed 2023.01.29).
  27. Japan Subculture Research Center (2021). The People of Tokyo Hate The Tokyo 2020 Olympics. Why do they protest? -- Available at: http://www.japansubculture.com/tokyo-hates-the-olympics/, (accessed 2023.06.22).
  28. Kietlinski R. (2016). Japan in the Olympics, the Olympics in Japan. Education About ASIA, 21(2): 35-40.
  29. Knoblauch H. and Löw M. (2020). The re-figuration of spaces and refigured modernity – concept and diagnosis. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 45(2): 263-292.
  30. Komiya K. and Tanaka C. (2021). ‘Suffocated’ Art becomes a form of protest against the Olympics. -- Available at: https://apnews.com/article/health-coronavirus-pandemic-2020-tokyo-olympics-olympic-games-sports-dd8098040f1f965ae90d289ca35c7423, (accessed 2023.01.14).
  31. Kunimoto N. (2018). Olympic Dissent: Art, Politics, and the Tokyo Olympic Games of 1964 and 2020. The Asia Pacific Journal, 16(15:2): 1-8.
  32. Lansiaux E., Tchagaspanian N., Arnaud J., Durand P., Changizi M. and Forget J. (2021). Side Effects of Public Health Policies Against Covid-19: The Story of an Over-Reaction. Public Health, 9: 1-5.
  33. Lee J. (2021). Artist uses face masks to create miniature version of Tokyo 2020 Olympics. -- Available at: https://sea.mashable.com/culture/16894/artist-uses-face-masks-to-create-miniature-version-of-tokyo-2020-olympics, (accessed 2023.01.08).
  34. MacLean D., editor (2019). Artist, Authorship & Legacy: A Reader. London: Ridinghouse.
  35. Mainichi Newspaper (2021). Uproar after protesters’ voices muted in NHK Olympic torch livestream. -- Available at: https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20210406/p2a/00m/0na/027000c, (accessed 2023.5.30).
  36. Marinetto M. (2003). Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement. Sociology, 37(1): 103-120.
  37. Mei J.-Q. (2015). Functions of oral history from inheritor of intangible cultural heritage in cultural heritage protection. In: 2nd Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development, 178-180. Atlantis Press.
  38. Minamisoma City Hall. (2021). Mocco, the Giant Puppet visits Minamisoma. -- Available at: https://www.city.minamisoma.lg.jp/portal/english/whats_new/minamisomatopicsenglish/2021fy/15433.html, (accessed 2023.5.30).
  39. Naul R., Binder D., Rychtecky A. and Culpan I., editors (2017). Olympic education: an international review. Abingdon: Routledge.
  40. No Olympics 2020. No Olympics 2020[@hangorinnokai] (2019, March 28). Yesterday, March 27, was exactly two years since Miyashita Park was forced to close! [Image attached] [Tweet]. Twitter. -- https://twitter.com/hangorinnokai/status/1111247860073324550.
  41. Olmo S. (2018). TRANSART. Transactions, transferences and transitions in participatory art. Barcelona, Research, Art, Creation, 6(3): 322-349.
  42. Olympics Watch (2023). Hangorin no Kai. -- Available at: https://olympicswatch.org/tag/hangorin-no-kai/, (accessed 2023.06.01).
  43. Reconstruction Agency (2016). Basic Guidelines for Reconstruction in Response to the Great East Japan Earthquake. -- Available at: https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/topics/. Laws_etc/20160527_basic-guidelines.pdf, (accessed 2023.02.28).
  44. Rosandich T.P. (2010). The Use of Sport Art for the Development of Olympic Education: Passing the Visual Torch. The Sport Journal (24). -- Available at: https://thesportjournal.org/article/the-use-of-sport-art-for-the-development-of-olympic-education-passing-the-visual-torch/, (accessed 2023.05.29).
  45. Sport for Tomorrow (n.d.) What is Sport for Tomorrow? -- Available at: https://www.sport4tomorrow.jpnsport.go.jp/, (accessed 2022.12.28).
  46. Swaddling J. (1999). The Ancient Olympic Games. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  47. Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (2021). “MOCCO” 10-metre Giant Puppet Unveiled Prior to Tohoku-to-Tokyo Tour of the Tokyo 2020 NIPPON Festival. -- Available at: https://olympics.com/en/news/mocco-10m-giant-puppet-unveiled-prior-to-tohoku-to-tokyo-tour, (accessed 2023.02.17).
  48. Tokyo Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games (2018). Overview of the Tokyo 2020 Games Sustainability Plan. -- Available at: https://gtimg.tokyo2020.org/image/upload/production/uiwrmekevpl4zcow9eza.pdf, (accessed 2023.02.14).
  49. Tomlinson A. (2014). Olympic legacies: recurrent rhetoric and harsh realities. Contemporary Social Science, 9(2): 137-158. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2014.912792
  50. Traganou J. (2012). Foreword: Design Histories of the Olympic Games. Journal of Design History, 25(3): 245-251.
  51. Yoshida H. (2009). The Art Competitions in the Modern Olympic Games: Rethinking the Boundary Problem between Art and Sport. Aesthetics, 13: 111-120.
  52. Zhang Y.S.D., Noels K., Young-Leslie H. and Lou N.M. (2022). “Responsible” or “Strange?” Differences in Face Mask Attitudes and Use Between Chinese and Non-East Asian Canadians During COVID-19’s First Wave. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 1-15.

Devena Haggis, A Reflection on the Connections between Art, Sport, Community and Tokyo 2020 in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 1/2023, pp 39-57, DOI: 10.3280/WE2023-001004