Comunità moderne come ecosistemi sociali ubiqui: prospettive di ricerca e di intervento Modern communities as ubiquitous social ecosystems: research and intervention perspectives

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’
Autori/Curatori Flora Gatti, Fortuna Procentese
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2022/2
Lingua Italiano/Inglese Numero pagine 5 P. 5-9 Dimensione file 136 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSC2022-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Batiste, D. P. (2013). “0 Feet Away”: The Queer Cartography of French Gay Men’s Geo-social Media Use. Anthropological Journal of European Cultures, 22(2), 111-132.
  2. Blanchard, A., & Horan, T. (2000). Virtual communities and social capital. In G. D. Garson (ed.), Social dimensions of information technology: Issues for the new millennium (pp. 6-22). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Carillo, F., Fenizia, E., & Parrello, S., (2022). Da Maestri di Strada a CoroNauti: l’impatto della pandemia sulla comunità educante di una periferia metropolitana. Psicologia di Comunità, 2/2022, 80-98. DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-00200
  5. Cecconi, A., Guarino, A., Albanesi, C. (2022). Youth engagement for social justice: the role of digital tools in civic organizations dealing with migration. Psicologia di Comunità, 2/2022, 99-118. DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-00200
  6. Gatti, F., & Procentese, F. (2020a). Being Involved in the Neighborhood through People-Nearby Applications: A Study Deepening Their Social and Community-Related Uses, Face-to-Face Meetings among Users, and Local Community Experience. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2730, paper 5. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2730/paper5.pdf
  7. Gatti, F., & Procentese, F. (2020b). Open Neighborhoods, Sense of Community, and Instagram Use: Disentangling Modern Local Community Experience through a Multilevel Path Analysis with a Multiple Informant Approach. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 27(3), 313-329. DOI: 10.4473/TPM27.3.2
  8. Gatti, F., & Procentese, F. (2021). Experiencing Urban Spaces and Social Meanings through Social Media: Unravelling the Relationships between Instagram City-Related Use, Sense of Place, and Sense of Community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101691.
  9. Gatti, F., & Procentese, F. (2022). Ubiquitous local community experiences: unravelling the social added value of neighborhood-related social media. Psicologia di Comunità, 2/2022, 56-79. DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-00200
  10. Gatti, F., Procentese, F., & Mitchell, R. (2021). Prospettive di Connessioni Urbane*: a case study about using Instagram to keep in touch with urban places in Naples (Italy) during COVID-19 pandemic. In Mindtrek 2021: Academic Mindtrek 2021 (pp. 41-48). NY: ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3464327.3464346
  11. Gatti, F., Procentese, F., & Schouten, A. P. (2022). People-Nearby Applications Use and Local Community Experiences: Disentangling Their Interplay Through a Multilevel, Multiple Informant Approach. Media Psychology, in press.
  12. Hsiao, J. C. Y., & Dillahunt, T. R. (2017). People-nearby applications: How newcomers move their relationships offline and develop social and cultural capital. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 26-40. DOI: 10.1145/2998181.2998280
  13. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. NY: Harpers.
  14. Licoppe, C. (2013). Merging mobile communication studies and urban research: Mobile locative media, “onscreen encounters” and the reshaping of the interaction order in public places. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 122-128. DOI: 10.1177/205015791246448
  15. Miller, B. (2015). “They’re the modern-day gay bar”: Exploring the uses and gratifications of social networks for men who have sex with men. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 476-482.
  16. Paasovaara, S., Lucero, A., & Olsson, T. (2016). Outlining the design space of playful interactions between nearby strangers. Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, 216-225. DOI: 10.1145/2994310.2994344
  17. Serritella, E., Duradoni, M., Guidi, E., Cecchini, C., Vilone, D., & Guazzini A. (2022). Self-presentation and emotional contagion on Facebook: new experimental measures of profiles’ emotional coherence. Psicologia di Comunità, 2/2022, 13-33. DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-00200
  18. Sica, L. S. (2022). L’identità corporea digitalizzata: l’utilizzo dei social media nella costruzione dell’immagine di Sé di adolescenti e giovani adulti. Psicologia di Comunità, 2/2022, 34-55. DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-00200
  19. Toch, E., & Levi, I. (2012). What can “people-nearby” applications teach us about meeting new people? Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp ‘12), 802-803.
  20. Tonkiss, F. (2014). Cities by design: the social life of urban form. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Van De Wiele, C., & Tong, S. T. (2014). Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing (Ubicomp ‘14), 619-630. DOI: 10.1145/2632048.2636070
  22. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities. Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. A. Smith & P. Kollock (eds.), Communities in cyberspace, (pp. 167-194). London, UK: Routledge.

Flora Gatti, Fortuna Procentese, Comunità moderne come ecosistemi sociali ubiqui: prospettive di ricerca e di intervento Modern communities as ubiquitous social ecosystems: research and intervention perspectives in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA’" 2/2022, pp 5-9, DOI: 10.3280/PSC2022-002001