The struggle to find one’s place. A study on prisoner reentry process in Italy

Journal title WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
Author/s Daniela Ronco, Valeria Verdolini
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2024/2
Language English Pages 19 P. 121-139 File size 120 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2024-002009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study examines the effects of incarceration on post-release marginalization in a northern Italian metropolitan area, focusing on the enduring stigma and social exclusion faced by formerly incarcerated individuals. While international research on prisoner reentry is extensive, the Italian context remains underexplored, partly due to limited critical analysis of pre-incarceration factors and challenges in accessing this population for qualitative research. The reentry process is conceptualized as a cyclical phenomenon with three stages: pre-release, release, and post-release. The latter phase proves particularly challenging, with recidivism rates of 50% to 70% within five years, perpetuating a costly cycle of reoffending and reincarceration. Incarceration disrupts relationships, employment, housing, and access to social services, exacerbating vulnerabilities among marginalized groups, including undocumented migrants, individuals with mental health or substance use disorders, and those in poverty. Using qualitative methods, the study draws on interviews with 15 formerly incarcerated individuals and focus groups with rehabilitation practitioners to explore the persistence of stigma and marginalization after release. It also investigates how metropolitan settings influence reintegration, highlighting the continued struggles in overcoming societal barriers and achieving successful reentry.

Keywords: prisoner reentry process; marginalisation; prisoners; social reintegration.

  1. Andersen T.S., Isom Scott D.A., Boheme H.M., King S. and Mikell T. (2020). What matters to formerly incarcerated men? Looking beyond recidivism as a measure of successful reintegration. The Prison Journal, 100(4): 488-509. DOI: 10.1177/0032885520939295
  2. Currie E. (2013). The sustaining society. In: Carrington K., Ball M., O’Brien E. and Juan Marcellus Tauri J.M., editors, Crime, justice and social democracy: International perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3-15.
  3. De Giorgi A. (2017). Back to nothing: prisoner reentry and neoliberal neglect. Social Justice, 44(1): 83-120.
  4. Farrall S., editor (2019). The architecture of desistance. London: Routledge.
  5. Farrall S. and Maruna S. (2004). Desistance-Focused Criminal Justice Policy Research: Introduction to a Special Issue on Desistance from Crime and Public Policy. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 43(4): 358-367.
  6. Ferguson R. (1990). Introduction: invisible center. In: Ferguson R., Gever M., Minh-Ha T.T., West C., editors, Out There: marginalization and Contemporary Cultures. New York: The new Museum of modern art, pp. 1-14.
  7. Harding D.J., Morenoff J.D. and Herbert C.W. (2013). Home is hard to find: Neighborhoods, institutions, and the residential trajectories of returning prisoners. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1): 214-236.
  8. Hester S. and Eglin P. (2017). A sociology of crime. London: Routledge.
  9. LeBel T.P. (2012). Invisible Stripes? Formerly Incarcerated Persons’ Perceptions of Stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33(2): 89-107.
  10. Leverentz A. (2011). Neighborhood context of attitudes toward crime and reentry. Punishment & Society, 13(1): 64-92. DOI: 10.1177/1462474510385629
  11. Leverentz A., Chen E.Y. and Christian J., editors (2020). Beyond Recidivism: New Approaches to Research on Prisoner Reentry and Reintegration. New York: Ny Press.
  12. Lorenzon J. (2020). Dalla matematica della recidiva alla complessità del fine pena. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 3: 631-644. DOI: 10.1447/99931
  13. Maruna S. (2011). Reentry as a rite of passage. Punishment & Society, 13(1): 3-28. DOI: 10.1177/1462474510385641
  14. Middlemass K.M. (2014). “I Ain’t Going Back”. Prisoner reentry & the “Gray area” between success and failure. Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
  15. Mosconi G. and Baccaro L. (2004). Il girone dei dannati: ovvero, il fenomeno della recidiva. Rassegna Penitenziaria e Criminologica, 2.
  16. Ronco D. e Torrente G. (2017). Pena e ritorno. Una ricerca su interventi di sostegno e recidiva. Milano: Ledizioni.
  17. Sbraccia A. (2020). Il rientro in società: nodi critici nell’analisi delle traiettorie di uscita dal penitenziario. In: Decembrotto L., editors, Adultità fragili, fine pena e percorsi inclusivi. Teorie e pratiche di reinserimento sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 67-81.
  18. Sbraccia A. and Vianello F. (2016). Introduzione. Carcere, ricerca sociologica, etnografia. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2: 183-210. DOI: 10.3240/84117
  19. Sen A. (1994). La diseguaglianza. Bologna: il Mulino.
  20. Sette R. (2016). La recidiva in Italia: riflessioni per il monitoraggio del fenomeno. Rivista di Criminologia, Vittimologia e Sicurezza, X(3): 110-121.
  21. Simes J.T. (2018). Place after prison: Neighborhood attainment and attachment during reentry. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(4): 443-463. DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1495041
  22. Smiley C.J. (2023). Purgatory citizenship: Reentry, race, and abolition. Univ of California Press.
  23. Travis J. (2005). But they all come back: facing the challenges of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
  24. Western B. (2018). Homeward: Life in the year after prison. Russell Sage Foundation. DOI: 10.7758/9781610448710
  25. Western B. and Sirois C. (2019). Racialized Re-entry: labor market inequality after incarceration. Social Forces, 97(4): 1517-1542.
  26. Williams J.M., Wilson S. and Bergeson C. (2020). Health implications of incarceration and reentry on returning citizens: A qualitative examination of black men’s experiences in a Northeastern city. American Journal of Men’s Health, 14(4). DOI: 10.1177/1557988320937211

Daniela Ronco, Valeria Verdolini, The struggle to find one’s place. A study on prisoner reentry process in Italy in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 2/2024, pp 121-139, DOI: 10.3280/WE2024-002009