The role of conditional conservatism on acquirers’ stock prices around M&A announcement

Titolo Rivista FINANCIAL REPORTING
Autori/Curatori Fiorenza Meucci, Annamaria Zampella, Gianluca Ginesti, Adele Caldarelli
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 27 P. 149-175 Dimensione file 258 KB
DOI 10.3280/fr202517552
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Purpose: This study investigates the relationship between conditional conservatism and the market reaction of firms’ stock prices in Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) operations. Design/methodology/approach: Leveraging a sample of 224 U.S. listed companies and event study methodology, as well as regression models, this study analyses 735 M&A deals from 2010 to 2018. Findings: We find that conditional conservatism is positively associated with cumulative abnormal returns of acquiring firms post-M&A announcement; moreover, one of the drivers of this result is the information asymmetry channel. Additional analysis also shows that while acquirers with high conditional conservatism experience a positive reaction to M&A announcements, there is no significant reaction for acquirers with low conditional conservatism. Originality/value: Our main results provide evidence that a high conditional conservatism limits the reduction of acquiring firms’ stock prices post-announcement of M&A. Our additional analyses show that low conditional conservatism does not exert a significant negative impact on acquiring firms’ stock prices post-announcement of M&A, as would be expected. Practical implications: This paper may be useful for both investors and practitioners since it offers interesting insights on how to deal with accounting policies and benefit from M&A transactions. Indeed, if they are informed on how conditional conservatism exerts a role on stock prices, they are less likely to engage in value-destroying M&A transactions. In addition, our results may interest standard setters interested in the role of the conservatism principle under the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

Parole chiave:conditional conservatism, market reaction, stock prices, acquirer firms, M&A, event study

Jel codes:M41, G14, G34

  1. Basu, S. (2005). Discussion of Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3), 311-321.
  2. Adnan, A. T. M., Hossain, A., Adnan, A., & Hossain, A. (2016). Impact of M&A announcement on acquiring and target firm’s stock price: An event analysis approach, International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(5), 228-232.
  3. Aït-Sahalia, Y., Andritzky, J., Jobst, A., Nowak, S., & Tamirisa, N. (2012). Market response to policy initiatives during the global financial crisis. Journal of International Economics, 87(1), 162-177.
  4. Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609. DOI: 10.2307/2978933
  5. Ahmed, A. S., Chen, L. H., Duellman, S., & Sun, Y. (2023). Targets’ Accounting Conservatism and the Gains from Acquisition. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(1), 7-40. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12814
  6. Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2011). Evidence on the role of accounting conservatism in monitoring managers’ investment decisions. Accounting & Finance, 51(3), 609-633.
  7. Armstrong, C. S., Core, J. E., Taylor, D. J., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2011). When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital?. Journal of accounting research, 49(1), 1-40.
  8. Badia, M., Duro, M., Penalva, F., & Ryan, S. G. (2021). Debiasing the measurement of conditional conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 59(4), 1221-1259. DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12366
  9. Balakrishnan, K., Watts, R., & Zuo, L. (2016). The effect of accounting conservatism on corporate investment during the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43(5-6), 513-542.
  10. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83-128.
  11. Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 3-37. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
  12. Beaver, W. H., & Ryan, S. G. (2005).Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3), 269-309.
  13. Biddle, G. C., & Hilary, G. (2006). Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 963-982.
  14. Biddle, G. C., Ma, M. L., & Song, F. M. (2022). Accounting conservatism and bankruptcy risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 37(2), 295-323. DOI: 10.1177/0148558X20934244
  15. Binder, J. (1998). The event study methodology since 1969. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 11(2), 111-137. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008295500105
  16. Bliss, J. H. (1924). Management through accounts. New York: Ronald Press.
  17. Brenner, M. (1979). The sensitivity of the efficient market hypothesis to alternative specifications of the market model. The Journal of Finance, 34(4), 915-929. DOI: 10.2307/2327056
  18. Brown, S.J., and J.B. Warner (1985). Using Daily Stock Returns: the Case of Event Studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3-31. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
  19. Chandra, U. (2011). Income conservatism in the US technology sector. Accounting Horizons, 25(2), 285-314.
  20. Courteau, L. (2020). The information content of Fairness Opinions in M&A: Evidence from Italy. Financial Reporting, 1, 5-46. DOI: 10.3280/FR2020-001001
  21. Cui, L., Kent, P., Kim, S., & Li, S. (2021). Accounting conservatism and firm performance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting & Finance, 61(4), 5543-5579.
  22. Dietrich, J. R., Muller III, K. A., & Riedl, E. J. (2023). On the validity of asymmetric timeliness measures of accounting conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 28(4), 2150-2195.
  23. Easley, D., & O’hara, M. (2004). Information and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553-1583.
  24. Erdem, O. (2020). Freedom and stock market performance during Covid-19 outbreak. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101671, 1-6.
  25. Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.2307/2525569
  26. Fiondella, C. (2014). Il principio di prudenza. Profili teorici, orientamento della prassi e evidenze empiriche. Torino: Giappichelli.
  27. Francis, J. R., & Martin, X. (2010). Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1-2), 161-178.
  28. Garci´a Lara, J. M., Garci´a Osma, B., & Penalva, F. (2016). Accounting conservatism and firm investment efficiency. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 221-238.
  29. Garci´a Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., & Penalva, F. (2020). Conditional conservatism and the limits to earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(4), 106738.
  30. Giosi, A., Caiffa, M., & Schina, D. (2016). The M&A operations as source of agency problems on the short-term: the relevance of corporate governance mechanism. Pubblicazioni SIDREA. -- Available at: https://www.sidrea.it/ma-operations-agency-problems/.
  31. Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(3), 287-320. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)
  32. 00024-0.
  33. Harakeh, M., Lee, E., & Walker, M. (2024). Understanding how the effects of conditional conservatism measurement bias vary with the research context. European Accounting Review, 33(1), 191-222. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2022
  34. 2074864.
  35. Hines, T., McBride, K., & Page, M. (1999). An investigation into the stock market reaction to press notices issued by the Financial Reporting Review Panel. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 53-82. DOI: 10.1108/96754269980000789
  36. Jaggi, B., Allini, A., Macchioni, R., & Zampella, A. (2018). Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 50, 1031-1056.
  37. Jayaraman, S., & Shivakumar, L. (2013). Agency-based demand for conservatism: evidence from state adoption of antitakeover laws. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(1), 95-134.
  38. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. -- Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=94043.
  39. Jory, S., Ngo, T., & Susnjara, J. (2020). Stock mergers and acquirers’ subsequent stock price crash risk. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 54(1), 359-387.
  40. Keane, M., & Neal, T. (2023). Instrument strength in IV estimation and inference: A guide to theory and practice. Journal of Econometrics, 235(2), 1625-1653.
  41. Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3), 132-150.
  42. Kim, Y., Li, S., Pan, C., & Zuo, L. (2013). The role of accounting conservatism in the equity market: Evidence from seasoned equity offerings. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1327-1356.
  43. Kim, B. H., & Pevzner, M. (2010). Conditional accounting conservatism and future negative surprises: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4), 311-329.
  44. Kim, J. B., & Zhang, L. (2016). Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk: Firm-level evidence. Contemporary accounting research, 33(1), 412-441. DOI: 10.1111/1911-3846.12112
  45. Kravet, T. D. (2014). Accounting conservatism and managerial risk-taking: Corporate acquisitions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 57(2-3), 218-240.
  46. LaFond, R., & Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83(29, 447-478.
  47. LaFond, R., & Roychowdhury, S. (2008). Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 101-135.
  48. Lawrence, A., Sloan, R., & Sun, Y. (2013). Non-discretionary conservatism: Evidence and implications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 112-133.
  49. Lipson, M. L., & Mortal, S. (2007). Liquidity and firm characteristics: evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Markets, 10(4), 342-361.
  50. Lys, T., & Sabino, J. S. (1992). Research design issues in grouping-based tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), 355-387. DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(92)90033-T
  51. Ma, J., Pagan, J. A., & Chu, Y. (2009). Abnormal Returns to Mergers and Acquisitions in Ten Asian Stock Markets. International Journal of Business, 14(3), 236-250.
  52. MacKinlay A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39. -- Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691.
  53. Miller, B. P. (2010). The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85(6) 2107-2143.
  54. Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2005). Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. The Journal of Finance, 60(2), 757-782.
  55. Monaco, E., Ibikunle, G., Palumbo, R., & Zhang, Z. (2022). The liquidity and trading activity effects of acquisition payment methods: Evidence from the announcements of private firms’ acquisitions. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102187.
  56. Novialdi, F.R. and Wardhani, R. (2019). Cross-border acquisition and financial leverage: the empirical evidence from acquisition in Asia. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(1) 206-228. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-12-2018-0413
  57. Onali, E., & Ginesti, G. (2014). Pre-adoption market reaction to IFRS 9: A cross-country event-study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(6), 628-637.
  58. Pae, J., Thornton, D. B., & Welker, M. (2005). The link between earnings conservatism and the price-to-book ratio. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 693-717. DOI: 10.1506/9FDN-N6ED-LJE9-A1HL
  59. Pelger, C. (2020). The return of stewardship, reliability and prudence–a commentary on the IASB’s new conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 17(1), 33-51. DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2019.1645960
  60. Avallone, F., & Roncagliolo, E. (2021). The complexity in measuring M&A performance: Is a multi-dimensional approach enough?. Financial Reporting, 1, 89-117. DOI: 10.3280/FR2021-001004
  61. Savor, P. G., & Lu, Q. (2009). Do stock mergers create value for acquirers?. The Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1061-1097.
  62. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312. DOI: 10.2307/270723
  63. Tang, Q., Guo, J., & Huang, Z. (2021). The role of accounting conservatism in M&A target selection. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(4), 100204.
  64. Tang, Z., & Xu, X. (2016). What Causes the Target Stock Price Run-Up Prior to M&A Announcements?. Journal of Accounting & Finance, 16(6), pp. 106-120. Available at: http://www.www.na-businesspress.com/JAF/TangZ_Web16_6_.pdf.
  65. Tidbury, D., Cahan, S. F., & Chen, L. (2022). Does deal size moderate the effects of board faultlines? Evidence from acquisitions. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(5), 1334-1366. DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-06-2020-0919
  66. Wang, Z., Dong, Y., & Liu, A. (2022). How does China's stock market react to supply chain disruptions from COVID-19?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102168.
  67. Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287-301.
  68. Yong, H. H. A., & Laing, E. (2021). Stock market reaction to COVID-19: Evidence from US Firms’ International exposure. International Review of Financial Analysis, 76, 101656.

Fiorenza Meucci, Annamaria Zampella, Gianluca Ginesti, Adele Caldarelli, The role of conditional conservatism on acquirers’ stock prices around M&A announcement in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2025, pp 149-175, DOI: 10.3280/fr202517552